Sybistroma theodori Grichanov et Nourti, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.15298/rusentj.30.2.14 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B1591E-AF4D-0417-FF5E-49F6D0F79D02 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Sybistroma theodori Grichanov et Nourti |
status |
nom. nov. |
Sybistroma theodori Grichanov et Nourti View in CoL , nom.n.
Figs 5, 7.
Hercostomus quadrifilatus Becker, 1917: 198 View in CoL (in key), 234, Figs 55, 56 (nec Strobl, 1899). Type locality: not given ( Spain).
Sybistroma quadrifilata ( Becker, 1917) (nec Strobl, 1899), comb.n.
MATERIAL EXAMINED. Neotype ♂, here designated (dried from ethanol and mounted on pin): Morocco, Larache Province , Moulay Abdelsalam, 8.I.2020, 35°22´16.136´´N, 5°33.14.15´´W, 649 m, K. Kettani leg. ( ZIN).
HABITAT. The habitat represents a moorland covered with Erica sp. and Cistus sp. and dotted with rocks on a
8
limestone ground ( Fig. 12 View Fig ). A scrubland of Quercus suber surrounded the moor.
NOTES. First record of the species from Morocco. It is unclear, why did Theodor Becker [1917] describe a new species under the name “ quadrifilatus Strobl ”. He did not provide any data on the material examined. We can only suppose that this material originated from Spain. Both Stackelberg [1934] and Parent [1938] included the species into their keys of Hercostomus , re-published Becker´s description and figures, but adding no new material and points of distribution. Morge and Negrobov [1981] placed G. quadrifilatus Strobl in synonymy with H. parvilamellatus and noted that the Becker´s description deserved a new name. None specimen with the name quadrifilatus was found in European museums keeping Becker´s collections, being most probably lost. Therefore, we designate here the neotype of Hercostomus quadrifilatus Becker, 1917 collected in Morocco. The specimen corresponds to the original description by Becker [1917] and to the diagnoses provided in keys by Stackelberg [1934] and Parent [1938]. The morphology of the species corresponds entirely with the generic concept of Sybistroma as described by Brooks [2005]. The antenna of its male has enlarged scape, reduced pedicel, arista-like stylus with one or more lamellae; the hypopygium has elongated and setose apicoventral epandrial lobe, and basiventral epandrial lobes are elongated and digitiform, shifted ventrally and lying beside hypandrium; the wing has weak sinuous anterior bend before middle.
ETYMOLOGY. The species name is dedicated to famous German dipterist, Theodor Becker (1840–1928).
DIAGNOSIS. The species keys to Sybistroma spectabilis ( Parent, 1928) , which has postpedicel mostly yellow-orange, rounded. S. theodori has entirely black antenna with angular apex of postpedicel [see also figures in Becker, 1917; Stackelberg, 1934; Parent, 1938].
9
KEY TO THE MEDITERRANEAN SPECIES OF SYBISTROMA View in CoL (MALES) This key is built on Grichanov, Kazerani [2014] but has modifications based on material examined for the present study. The species distribution follows the same work.
1. At least femora entirely or almost entirely brownblack ............................................................................. 2
— Legs mainly yellow or reddish yellow ...................... 11
2. Antennal stylus very long, basodorsal, with apical flag .... 3
— Antennal stylus simple ................................................ 6
3. Antennal stylus with rounded or ovate apical flag, flag entirely black; fore and mid tibiae yellow or red-yellow, at least basal part of hind tibia yellow or reddish ........... 4
— Antennal stylus with lanceolate apical flag, flag black with white apex; legs entirely or almost entirely brownblack ............................................................................. 5
4. Antennal postpedicel mostly yellow-orange, rounded; cercus obovate, 1.5 times longer than wide; body length 3.75 mm ( France and Spain) ......................................... ......................................... S. spectabilis ( Parent, 1928)
— Antenna entirely black with angular apex of postpedicel; cercus band-like, about 3 times times longer than wide; body length 3.0 mm ( Morocco and Spain) .................... ...................... S. theodori Grichanov et Nourti , nom.n.
5. Antennal stylus with apical expansion of first article in addition to apical flattening of second article;body length 3.5 mm ( Hungary and Romania) ...... S. maerens Loew, 1873
— Stylus with apical flattening only; apical flag of stylus rhomboid, black, white at extreme apex; body length 3.5 mm (the Caucasus and Turkey) ...................................... .......................... S. transcaucasica ( Stackelberg, 1941)
6. Antennal postpedicel not longer or slightly longer than high ............................................................................... 7
— Postpedicel at least 1.5 times longer than high at base 9
7. Antennal stylus of uniform thickness throughout; apicoventral epandrial lobe much longer than rounded-triangular cercus; body length 2.5–3.0 mm ( Croatia, France, Greece, Italy, Turkey) ............... S. lorifera (Mik, 1878)
— Antennal stylus normal, tapering; apicoventral epandrial lobe shorter than band-like cercus .............................. 8
8. Antennal stylus with basal segment slightly shorter than apical segment; cercus elbowed, yellow, with long apical setae; phallus expanded distally; body length 3.0 mm ( Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and UK) ....... .............................. S. parvilamellata ( Macquart, 1827)
— Antennal stylus with basal segment distinctly longer than apical segment; cercus straight, black, with equally short setae; phallus narrowed distally; body length 3.0 mm ( Morocco and Spain) ............ S. parvula ( Parent, 1927)
9. Stylus middorsal; postpedicel 1.5 times longer than high at base; apicocentral epandrial lobe expanded distad, with very long hooked setae; body length 3.0 mm (from France across Europe to the Caucasus) ........................ ............................................... S. caudata (Loew, 1859)
— Stylus almost apical or subapical; postpedicel at least twice longer than high at base; epandrial lobe with short simple setae ................................................................ 10
10. Stylus shorter than postpedicel; apicoventral epandrial lobe band-like, much longer than cercus, longer than hypopygium; body length 3.0 mm (West, Central and South Europe) ....................... S. inornata (Loew, 1857)
— Stylus longer than postpedicel; apicoventral epandrial lobe much shorter than cercus and hypopygium; body length 3.3–3.5 mm (Golan Heights, Iran, Israel, Turkey) .............. S. occidasiatica Grichanov et Kazerani, 2014
11. Lower postocular setae white .................................... 12
— Postocular setae entirely black .................................. 22
12. Antennal stylus very long, with apical flag ............... 13
— Antennal stylus simple ............................................... 17
13. Face densely covered with light hairs increasing in length downwards; postpedicel 11 times longer than high at base, with rounded expansion at 1/ 3 in addition to ovoid apical flag on stylus; body length 3.5 mm ( Israel) ........ ................................... S. israelensis (Grichanov, 2000)
— Face glabrous; postpedicel much shorter .................. 14
14. Postpedicel twice longer than high at base ............... 15
— Postpedicel not longer than high ............................... 16
15. Fore tarsus modified, basitarsus with narrow apical projection bearing 4 long cilia, tarsomere 2 with a short anterior and a long posterior seta at apex, 3rd tarsomere as long as 1st and 2nd combined; mid femur with long fine ventral setae; antennal stylus with strong, almost round, black flattening at apex; body length 5.0 mm ( Austria, France, Italy, Portugal, Spain) ................ S. eucera (Loew, 1861)
— Fore tarsus simple; mid femur without long setae; antennal stylus with long and rather narrow apical widening that is black in basal half and white in apical half; body length 3.0 mm ( Bulgaria, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Romania, Russia (Krasnodar), Turkey) ........................ ............................................. S. impar (Rondani, 1843)
16. Antennal stylus with spatulate apical flag with white narrow apical half; mid and hind femora with yellow basoventral setae; body length 3.9 mm ( Turkey)........... ................................................ S. schachti Naglis, 2011
— Antennal stylus with rounded black apical flag with short whitish pointed apex; mid and hind femora bare ventrally; body length 3.5 mm (South Europe, North Africa, the Caucasus) ............................ S. dufouri Macquart, 1838
17. Fore tarsus simple; hypopygium mostly yellow; antennal postpedicel 1.33 as long as high; stylus much longer than pedicel, located before middle of dorsal surface ...... 18
— Fore tarsus modified; other features variable ............ 19
18. Abdomen thin; segment 7 long and thin; hypopygium reaching posterior margin of abdominal segment 2; body length 3.5–4.0 mm (Europe except North eastward to Novgorod Region and Mordovian Republic of Russia, Turkey, the Caucasus) ..... S. obscurella (Fallén, 1823)
— Abdomen thick; segment 7 short and thick; hypopygium reaching middle of abdominal segment 4; body length 3.0 mm ( Afghanistan, Belgium, Czech, Hungary, Italy, Slovakia) .................................... S. sciophila (Loew, 1869)
19. Antennal postpedicel not longer than high; stylus of uniform thickness throughout, with apical article 5 to 6 times as long as basal; foreleg with basitarsus bearing row of long ventral setae, tarsomere 5 white, enlarged and laterally compressed; body length 3.75–4.75 mm (from France across Europe to the Caucasus and Iran) ............. S. crinipes Staeger, 1842
— Postpedicel at least 1.5 times longer than high; stylus normal, tapering, with apical segment at most 2.5–3 times as long as basal one; foreleg not as above ................ 20
20. Foreleg with tarsomere 5 flattened and black, greatly enlarged, tarsomere 4 short and slightly broadened; antennal stylus mid-dorsal; body length 3.5–5.5 mm (from France across Europe to the Caucasus and Iran) ........... .............................................. S. discipes (Germar, 1821)
— Foreleg with tarsomere 5 white ................................. 21
21. Tarsomere 4 and 5 of foreleg moderately enlarged; antennal stylus middorsal, with dot-like thickening at middle; body length 4.5–5.0 mm ( Georgia and Iran) ................. .................. S. clara (Negrobov et Onishchenko, 1991)
— Tarsomere 5 of foreleg slightly enlarged; antennal stylus basodorsal; body length 4.0 mm (Central and South Europe, Turkey) .............. S. sphenoptera (Loew, 1859)
22. Legs simple; antennal stylus with black subapical flattening; postpedicel more than 4 times as long as high; cercus simple; body length 3.0 mm ( Austria, Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania, Slovakia) .................. S. setosa Schiner, 1862
— Fore or mid legs modified; other features various .... 23
23. Wing with deep emargination between M1+2 and CuA1; antennal scape and pedicel entirely black; mid tarsus simple; cercus simple, subrectangular; body length 3.9–4.4 mm ( Egypt and Israel) ........... S. sinaiensis (Grichanov, 2000)
— Wing simple; mid tarsus modified; other features various .............................................................................. 24
24. Tarsomeres 3–5 of midleg widened and flattened laterally, black; antennal scape and pedicel yellow ventrally; body length 3.1 mm ( Israel and Golan Height) ............. ........................................ S. golanica (Grichanov, 2000)
— Tarsomeres 3–5 of midleg somewhat widened, black, and tarsomere 5 snow-white; antennal scape yellow ventrally; body length 3.0–4.0 mm (West, Central and South Europe, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Turkey) ..................... .......................................... S. nodicornis Meigen, 1824
11
ZIN |
Russian Academy of Sciences, Zoological Institute, Zoological Museum |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Sybistroma theodori Grichanov et Nourti
Grichanov, I. Ya. & Nourti, M. 2021 |
Hercostomus quadrifilatus
Becker T. 1917: 198 |