Taibaishanus nankangensis, Irfan & Zhang & Peng, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/megataxa.8.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E0F8FFFD-A68E-4F2B-990A-386C3FAB2A09 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7555367 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AE87CE-BC58-FE98-FC8C-3A3FFAAFF8C6 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Taibaishanus nankangensis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Taibaishanus nankangensis sp. nov. (DZĖẊƠƜƦ) Figures 302–304 View FIGURE 302 View FIGURE 303 View FIGURE 304
Types. Holotype ♂, CHINA, Yunnan, Lonhyang County, Nankang , 24.81667ºN, 98.78333ºE, 2100m, 4–7 November 1998, Charles Griswold, D. H. Kavanaugh and Chun-lin Long leg. (98–NK). GoogleMaps
Etymology. This epithet derives from the type locality.
Diagnosis. The new species can be distinguished from the Taibaishanus elegans Tanasevitch, 2006 by the male cephalic region with tomb-shaped cephalic lobe in T. nankangensis sp. nov. ( Fig. 303A View FIGURE 303 ), whereas male cephalic lobe absent in T. elegans ( Tanasevitch, 2006, fig. 68). Dorsal tibial apophysis tongue-shaped and the retrolateral tibial apophysis tip without depression in T. nankangensis sp. nov. ( Fig. 302B–D View FIGURE 302 ), whereas dorsal tibial apophysis somewhat triangular and the retrolateral tibial apophysis tip with depression in T. elegans ( Tanasevitch, 2006, figs 69, 71). Embolus tip fine in T. nankangensis sp. nov. ( Fig. 302A, D View FIGURE 302 ), whereas broad with a small round outgrowth in T. elegans ( Tanasevitch, 2006, figs 70, 73). Radix slightly curved, longer than wide in T. nankangensis sp. nov. ( Fig. 302A–D View FIGURE 302 ), whereas U-shaped in T. elegans ( Tanasevitch, 2006, figs 70, 73).
Description. Male (holotype, Fig. 303A–C View FIGURE 303 ): Total length: 2.29. Carapace: 1.07 long, 0.84 wide, yellow; cephalic lobe anteriorly located, tomb-shaped 0.38 high, cephalic pits present at the base of the lobe; fovea, cervical and radial grooves distinct. Clypeus 0.24 high. Sternum longer than wide, cordiform. Labium wider than long. Maxillae long, distal end broad with scopulae. Chelicerae with four promarginal and five retromarginal teeth. Eye region narrow, AER recurved, PER straight, slightly wider than AER. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.04, ALE 0.08, PME 0.07, PLE 0.08, AME–AME 0.03, PME–PME 0.07, AME–ALE, 0.02, PME–PLE 0.04, AME–PME 0.06, ALE–ALE 0.31, PLE–PLE 0.34, ALE–PLE contiguous. Length of legs: I 3.39 (0.98, 1.12, 0.74, 0.55), II 3.04 (0.86, 1.01, 0.68, 0.49), III 2.61 (0.76, 0.84, 0.62, 0.39), IV 3.36 (0.94, 1.10, 0.82, 0.50). Leg formula I-IV-II-III. Tm I 0.41 and Tm IV 0.32. Tibial spine formula: 2-2-1-1. Abdomen 1.22 long, 0.74 wide, oval, gray, with transverse black bands extending posteriorly; ventral side grayish black.
Palp ( Fig. 302A–D View FIGURE 302 ). Patella shorter than tibia, ventrally slightly curved; tibia with two apophyses; dorsal tibial apophysis tongue-shaped with blunt end and the retrolateral tibial apophysis with long spines, distally curved with notched tip. Paracymbium U-shaped, distal arm tip hook-shaped.Protegulum membranous, extending forward. Radix slightly curved, longer than wide. The embolic division apophysis sclerotized, long, S-shaped apically. Embolus sinuous, tip fine and thin, forming a circle apically.
Female. Unknown.
Distribution. Known only from the type locality ( Fig. 304 View FIGURE 304 ).
Genus Tapinopa Westring, 1851 (ḂƦø)
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |