Pseudoasterophyllites cretaceus O. Feistmantel ex Velenovský 1887
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.4202/app.2009.0060 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AC7914-FFDE-3D4E-330C-157C4F46F8A3 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Pseudoasterophyllites cretaceus O. Feistmantel ex Velenovský 1887 |
status |
|
Pseudoasterophyllites cretaceus O. Feistmantel ex Velenovský 1887
Figs. 1–3 View Fig View Fig View Fig .
1874 Asterophyllites cretaceus ; O. Feistmantel 1874: 267 nomen nudum.
1887 Pseudoasterophyllites cretaceus O. Feistmantel ex Velenovský, 1887 ; Velenovský 1887: 643, figs. 19–25.
1889 Pseudoasterophyllites cretaceus O. Feistmantel ex Velenovský, 1887 ; Velenovský 1889: 44, 48, 52.
1901 Pseudoasterophyllites cretaceus O. Feistmantel ex Velenovský 1887 ; Frič and Bayer 1901: 87, fig. 37.
1926 Pseudoasterophyllites cretaceus O. Feistmantel ex Velenovský 1887 ; Velenovský and Vinklář 1926: 24, 53, pl. 2: 11, pl. 3: 6, 7, 9, 10.
1902 Pseudoasterophyllites cretaceus O. Feistmantel ex Velenovský 1887 ; Zeiller 1902: 11.
1954 Pseudoasterophyllites cretaceus O. Feistmantel ex Velenovský 1887 ; Teixeira 1954: 144, figs. 1, 2.
1963 Pseudoasterophyllites cretaceus O. Feistmantel ex Velenovský 1887 ; Němejc 1963: 318, text−fig. 167.
1997 Pseudoasterophyllites cretaceus O. Feistmantel ex Velenovský 1887 ; Uličný et al. 1997: 193.
2003 Pseudoasterophyllites cretaceus O. Feistmantel ex Velenovský 1887 ; Kvaček and Eklund 2003: 1033, fig. 12.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4202/app.2009.0060
Lectotype: designated here, NMP F 654 , Velenovský 1887: fig. 22 (refigured in Fig. 1A View Fig of this paper).
Type locality: Lipenec, Czech Republic.
Type horizon: Peruc Korycany Formation, Cenomaninan, Late Cretaceous.
Other material.—NMP F 654, NMP F 655, NMP F 656, NMP F 657, NMP F 1423, NMP F 2280, NMP F 2285, NMP F 2899, UL REN002.
Emended diagnosis.—Twigs branch 3–4 times. Axes consisting of nodes and internodes. Nodes consisting of two pairs of decussately arranged leaves very closely spaced forming semi−whorls. Lateral branches borne in leaf axils; branches either well developed or represented only by axilar bud. Leaves coriaceous, linear to cylindrical with rounded tip and broad, shortly decussate base. Leaves amphistomatic, bearing stomata in two distinct bands on adaxial and abaxial sides of leaf. Ordinary epidermal cells rectangular to isodiametric, with thick anticlinal walls, stomata paracytic with two narrow subsidiary cells and two exposed guard cells.
Dimensions.—Length of the axis: more than 110 mm; width of the axis: 0.5–3 mm; length of the leaves: 1–10 mm; width of leaves: 0.6–1 mm; length of guard cells: 20–24 µm; width of guard cells: 5–8 µm; length of epidermal cells: 20–35 µm; width of epidermal cells: 15–20 µm.
Description.—The lectotype specimen consists of 3 axes, each constructed of 4–6 nodes and internodes. Each axis is 10–15 mm long, and gives off leaves that are 7–9 mm long ( Fig. 1A, B View Fig ). Another specimen is 32 mm long ( Fig. 1F View Fig ). It shows axilary branching. Each branch possesses at least 5 nodes and internodes. The axis is longitudinally striate and 0.5–3 mm in diameter. The nodes consist of whorls of simple coriaceous linear leaves, which are wrinkled, suggesting that they were 3D cylindrical in vivo. Leaves are heavily cutinized and variable in size, i.e., 1−10 × 0.3−1 mm; they extend from the nodes in semi−whorls each consisting of two pairs very closely spaced of decussately arranged leaves. Lateral branches are given off in axilary position of each leaf. Branches may be well developed (i.e., real branches), or present only as axilar buds. The buds, together with the leaves, form rich semi−whorls. Due to their shape, the leaves do not possess clearly defined abaxial and adaxial sides. Stomata are arranged in two bands, probably one on the adaxial and one on the abaxial side. The stomata are oriented perpendicularly, longitudinally or obliquely to the leaf margin. The stomatal apparatus consists of two partly exposed guard cells (8–10 × 22–27.5 µm) and two narrow subsidiary cells (2–3 × 25–32.5 µm). Ordinary epidermal cells are isodiametric quadrangular or polygonal; their size is (8)–15–(20) × (8)–20–(25) µm ( Fig. 1C, D View Fig ). Anticlinal cell walls are straight (up to 3 µm in thickness). The periclinal walls are covered by small wrinkles and papillae, especially in parts close to the leaf margin ( Fig. 1E View Fig ).
Associated with the vegetative remains are stamens that are very similar in appearance to sterile leaves. Moreover, they possess the same epidermal cell pattern and idiocuticular features as the sterile leaves (compare Fig. 1D, E View Fig with Fig. 2E View Fig ). Stamens are ovoid−elongate, 3–3.5 mm long and 1–1.5 mm wide, massive, and not divided into an anther and filament showing a considerable amount of sterile tissues ( Fig. 2A View Fig ). They possess an apically expanded connective forming acute apical extensions ( Fig. 2D View Fig ), with a blunt apex bearing paracytic stomata. The stamens are tetrasporangiate and consist of two indistinct lobes. If macerated, each lobe shows two narrow pollen sacs ( Fig. 2B View Fig ) embedded in the tissue of the abaxial side of the stamen. Dehiscence is by longitudinal slits.
In situ pollen grains of the Tucanopollis type are sulcate, oblate to spheroidal, in polar view elliptic to circular, 18–24 µm in diameter ( Fig. 3A, C, D View Fig ). The aperture is broad and short, the membrane thin and often covered by echinate Ubisch bodies ( Fig. 3D View Fig ). The sculpture is psilate in LM, microechinate, perforate in SEM ( Fig. 2B View Fig ); exine thick (1.5–2 µm), nexine 0.8–1 µm, short columellae, tectum 1–1.2 µm .
Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Early to Late Cretaceous, Albian to Cenomanian. Czech Republic (Cenomanian): Pecínov, Praha−Hloubětín, Lipenec, Touchovice; France (Albian): Les Renardières, Tonnay−Charente, Charente−Maritime.
NMP |
National Museum (Prague) |
LM |
Secçáo de Botânica e Ecologia |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Genus |
Pseudoasterophyllites cretaceus O. Feistmantel ex Velenovský 1887
Kvaček, Jiří, Gomez, Bernard & Zetter, Reinhard 2012 |
Pseudoasterophyllites cretaceus O. Feistmantel ex Velenovský 1887
Kvacek, J. & Eklund, H. 2003: 1033 |
Pseudoasterophyllites cretaceus O. Feistmantel ex Velenovský 1887
Nemejc, F. 1963: 318 |
Pseudoasterophyllites cretaceus O. Feistmantel ex Velenovský 1887
Teixeira, C. 1954: 144 |
Pseudoasterophyllites cretaceus O. Feistmantel ex Velenovský 1887
Zeiller, R. 1902: 11 |
Pseudoasterophyllites cretaceus O. Feistmantel ex Velenovský 1887
Fric, A. & Bayer, E. 1901: 87 |
Pseudoasterophyllites cretaceus O. Feistmantel ex Velenovský, 1887
Velenovsky, J. 1889: 44 |
Pseudoasterophyllites cretaceus O. Feistmantel ex Velenovský, 1887
Velenovsky J. 1887: 643 |
Asterophyllites cretaceus
Feistmantel, O. 1874: 267 |