Bothropolys rugosus (Meinert, 1872)
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5100.2.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8E2CCF7B-11BE-43EF-BA29-FB8AD63E8C54 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6313215 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03ABA95B-FFAE-E727-72F5-F91EFB4C74AC |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Bothropolys rugosus (Meinert, 1872) |
| status |
|
Bothropolys rugosus (Meinert, 1872) View in CoL
Type locality: [Hawaii Is.] “ Oahu ” ( Bonato et al. 2016) .
Bothropolys rugosus View in CoL — Ma et al., 2008: 254 View Cited Treatment ; 2014: 354 View Cited Treatment .
Remarks. Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan are mentioned in the range of B. rugosus in Ma et al. (2014): “Also known from Uzbekistan, Kirghizstan, Japan, North Korea, the Philippines, New Guinea, and the Hawaiian Islands” with reference to Ma et al. (2008). However, this source does not include information on Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan: “ B. rugosus Meinert, 1872 from Japan, China, Korea, the Philippines, and introduced to Hawaii”.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Bothropolys rugosus (Meinert, 1872)
| Dyachkov, Yurii V., Farzalieva, Gyulli Sh. & Tuf, Ivan H. 2022 |
Bothropolys rugosus
| Ma, H. & Pei, S. & Hou, X. & Zhu, T. & Wu, D. & Gai, Y. 2014: 354 |
| Ma, H. & Song, D. & Zhu, M. 2008: 254 |