Nanocochlea exigua, Ponder & Clark & Eberhard & Studdert, 2005
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.1074.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8C36619A-8876-40C0-BA06-60AE4449DD49 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10533184 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AB87BA-2D2B-A220-E41F-F9887F43FCBD |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Nanocochlea exigua |
status |
sp. nov. |
Nanocochlea exigua n. sp.
Figures 6H View FIGURE 6 ; 8F View FIGURE 8 ; 14A–C View FIGURE 14 ; 15A–C View FIGURE 15 ; 16A–C View FIGURE 16 ; 17A–C View FIGURE 17 ; 18A View FIGURE 18 .
Type material
Holotype: AMS C.439393, Cane Toad Abuse streamway, Damper Cave, PB 12A, 28 MAR 1994.
Paratypes: AMS C. 203677, same data (20+ dry, 20+ wet) ; QVM, 9:20541 (5 wet).
Other material examined (all AMS)
Bauhaus: C.201820, stn PB61A (8 dry, 3 wet); C.201819, stn PB61A (1 dry); C,166855, Persephone Pot, stn PB178R (4 dry, 12 wet); C.201810, same locality, middle and upper streamway, stn PB172a.2 (7 dry); C.201814, same data (6 dry, 13 wet); C.201818, same locality, lower streamway, stn PB172a (1 dry); C.201274, Persephone, stn 7 (6 dry, 20+ wet); C.201461, Persephone streamway, stn 8 (7 dry, 20 wet); C.201455, same locality, stn 9 (6 dry, 20+ wet); C.201456, same locality, stn 10 (1 dry); C.201479, same locality, stn 10 (8 dry, 20+ wet); C.201462, Screaming Stals streamway, stn 12 (11 dry, 20+ wet); C.201480, same locality, stn 12 (5 dry); C.201457, same locality, stn 13 (1 dry).
Damper Cave: C.203683, main streamway near entrance, stn PB11A (3 dry); C.201465, main streamway, stn 6 (7 dry, 14 wet); C.439395, same data (2 dry, figd specimens); C.201482, Cane Toad Abuse streamway, stn 2 (8 dry, 20+ wet); C.201467, seep near The Keg, stn 3 (9 dry, 20+ wet); C.201475, Honey And Cream streamway, stn 4 (8 dry, 20+ wet); C.203679, Cane Toad Abuse streamway, stn PB12A (1 dry).
Damper Creek: C.203674, 10m outside Damper Cave, stn PBs2A (2 dry, 1 wet).
Quetzalcoatl Conduit: C. 203672, stn PB31C (1 dry).
Etymology Exiguus Latin, small, short.
Description
Shell ( Fig. 6H View FIGURE 6 ; 14A–C View FIGURE 14 ; 15A–C View FIGURE 15 ). Length up to 2.2 mm; elongateconic (SW/SL 0.39– 0.61, mean 0.50, n = 37); spire tall, straight to slightly convex in outline; last whorl evenly rounded or with subshoulder depression; suture simple or indented/impressed. Protoconch microsculpture uniform ( Fig. 6H View FIGURE 6 ). Teleoconch up to 3.7 whorls in adult; aperture oval to pearshaped; small, shorter than spire (AL/SL 0.30–0.45, mean 0.36, n = 37); outer lip orthocline to opisthocline; weakly thickened in adult, straight; posterior notch absent; inner lip thin and narrow, in partial contact or narrowly separated from parietal wall.
Dimensions. See Table 10.
Operculum ( Fig. 16A–C View FIGURE 16 ). Inner surface with white smear and 1 large peg.
Eyes. Unpigmented.
Pallial cavity ( Fig. 8F View FIGURE 8 ). Ctenidium rudimentary with no filaments; osphradium present, as in other taxa; hypobranchial gland thick to moderately developed; renal organ extends forward ca. ⅓–½ into pallial cavity; pericardium more than ½ in pallial roof.
Radula ( Fig. 17A–C View FIGURE 17 ). Central teeth: dorsal edge with deep indentation; 4–5 lateral cusps, median cusp narrow, blunt to sharply pointed, about twice as long as adjacent cusps. Lateral teeth: dorsal edge with shallow to moderate indentation; with 4–6 cusps on outer and 4–5 on inner side; median cusp narrow to medium width, blunt to sharply pointed, less than twice as long as adjacent cusps; ratio of cutting edge to shaft about ¼; basal projection bluntly pointed. Marginal teeth: Inner with 21–26 cusps; outer with 17–20 cusps.
Stomach. Stomach with posterior chamber a little smaller than anterior chamber.
Male genital system. Testis of 0.6–1.5 whorls; prostate gland about ⅔ in pallial roof, oval to kidneyshaped; compressed in section. Pallial vas deferens straight. Penis with weak swelling in middistal portion; distal end long, papillalike; medial section parallel sided, of medium length; penial duct in medial section strongly undulating; base of penis very to moderately wide; with moderate folds; penial duct straight to weakly undulating.
Female genital system. ( Fig. 18A View FIGURE 18 ). Ovary of 0.6–0.7 whorls; oviduct extends to posterior edge of bursa copulatrix or slightly less; joins bursal duct at posterior pallial wall. Bursa copulatrix large, extending to posterior pallial wall; elongately oval to pyriform; with bursal duct arising from anteroventral to ventral edge of bursa; straight or with undulations. Seminal receptacle at middle of inner wall of bursa copulatrix or near mid ventral edge; ovoid to pyriform. Two thirds to all of albumen gland in front of posterior pallial wall; capsule gland about same length as albumen gland; oval in section; anterior end tapering to blunt; ventral channel simple, approximately parallelsided throughout; vestibular area indistinct to distinct; genital opening overlapping anterior end of capsule gland to terminal.
Distribution and habitat
Found mainly in small, low energy streams and seepages in the caves. A few specimens were also found in Damper Creek 10 m outside Damper Cave.
Remarks
Nanocochlea exigua differs from other congeners in the operculum bearing a single large peg and in lacking a ctenidium (gill). In the former respect, it resembles some species included in Austropyrgus Cotton, 1942 ( Clark et al. 2003), as well as a number of other hydrobiid genera, including some found outside Australia. There are, however, several important characters that link N. exigua with Nanocochlea . There is no gastric caecum (present in Austropyrgus and several other genera bearing similar opercular pegs), the rectum is strongly Sshaped whereas in other genera with opercular pegs it is usually straight to arched. The female genital anatomy and penial morphology is also very like other species of Nanocochlea and unlike that of Austropyrgus . Assuming that the lack of the ctenidium in N. exigua has evolved from the presumed apomorphic condition seen in the other Precipitous Bluff congeners, and that no other species of Nanocochlea are known to possess an opercular peg, it is possible that the peg in this species is a secondary condition.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.