Cyanocypus, He & Zhou, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4759.2.8 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B70895F2-A6E4-4FEE-8FD4-AE79EA79557B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3811435 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AB2F70-EE67-8710-A1AB-0352FC20FB08 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cyanocypus |
status |
gen. nov. |
Cyanocypus View in CoL gen. nov.
( Figs. 1 View FIGURE 1 , 3 View FIGURE 3 , 4 View FIGURE 4 )
Type species. Cyanocypus leukos View in CoL sp. nov. (by monotypy).
Diagnosis. The new genus Cyanocypus gen. nov. differs from other members of the “ Staphylinus -complex” by the following characteristics: mandibles each with one simple tooth in middle of medial margin and with a deep subbasal emargination ( Figs. 1 C, D View FIGURE 1 ); last segment of maxillary palpus narrowly fusiform, with narrowly rounded apex, asetose; last segment of labial palpus setose, widely fusiform, with widely obliquely truncate apex ( Fig. 3 A View FIGURE 3 ); abdominal tergites with oblique accessory basal ridges; sensory peg setae numerous, distributed from apex to basal part of underside of paramere ( Fig. 3 E View FIGURE 3 ).
Description. Head, pronotum and elytra with shining blue metallic luster. Mandibles moderately long, each on medial margin with subbasal emargination, and with one simple tooth in middle ( Figs. 1 C, D View FIGURE 1 ). Mandibular prostheca with supporting structure long and lanceolate, with ciliae along medial margin short near basal part, but gradually becoming longer towards apex. Gular sutures subcontiguous in middle section. Maxillary palpus moderately long, last segment narrowly fusiform, with narrowly rounded apex, asetose. Labial palpus with last segment setose, widely fusiform, with widely obliquely truncate apex. Pronotal epimeron absent. Pronotal hypomeron glabrous. Superior and inferior lines of pronotal hypomeron join together at about anterior third of pronotal length; deflected portion of pronotal disc largely visible in ventral view at anterior angles of pronotum. Prosternum with sternacostal ridge bisinuate. Mesosternum short; intercoxal process narrow, quite acute apically. Elytra moderately long, not markedly depressed along base; wings fully developed. Metasternum long; anterior projection of metasternum broadly rounded, with acutely converging margins. Dorsolateral face of front tibia with a few spines on apical part; long spines on dorsolateral face of middle tibia robust, quite numerous; dorsolateral face of hind tibia with long spines only on apical half, distinctly shorter and fewer than those on middle tibia. Empodial setae moderately long, distinctly not reaching apex of claws. First three visible abdominal tergites with oblique basal lines extending posteriad from anterior basal line, base of tergite between extensions markedly transversely impressed; lateral parts of first three visible tergites and almost all the surface of visible tergite 5 covered with long silver pubescence.
Male genital segment with tergite 8 moderately wide, with obtusely triangular medioapical emargination; sternite 9 with tapered basal portion moderately long, apical portion with wide and deeply rounded medioapical emargination; tergite 10 subtriangular, obtusely angular at apex; aedeagus with sensory peg setae on underside of paramere extremely numerous, arranged from apical to basal part of apical portion of paramere.
Recognition and comments. The new genus Cyanocypus gen. nov., at present, contains only the type species Cyanocypus leukos sp. nov. It can be easily distinguished from other members of the “ Staphylinus -complex” by the characteristics listed above under Diagnosis, especially the mandibular characters. Mandible morphology is now considered as an important character system for distinguishing the genera of the “ Staphylinus -complex” ( Smetana, 2003). Smetana (2003) provided a summary of the types of mandible shape in the “ Staphylinus -complex”; however, the mandible morphology of Cyanocypus gen. nov. does not belong to any of those types. In this new genus, each mandible has a wide subbasal indentation and one simple tooth in the middle, easily distinguishing it from Ocypus and similar genera. A similar kind of wide subbasal indentation occurs in the species of Protocypus , but the tooth in the middle of the mandibles of Protocypus is bidentate ( Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 ). The new genus shares the modification of the abdominal tergites (first three visible abdominal tergites with accessory basal lines, base of tergite between these lines transversely impressed) with the genus Aulacocypus J. Müller , the “ bisinuatus -group” of the genus Sphaerobulbus Smetana , and the genera Nelmanwaslus Smetana and Wasmannellus Bernhauer. From these genera, Cyanocypus gen. nov. can be easily distinguished by the subbasal mandibular indentation ( Figs. 2 A, B View FIGURE 2 ).
The numerous sensory peg setae as well as their arrangement on underside of the paramere of Cyanocypus gen. nov. are also quite unique in the Staphylinus complex. In all other genera or species of the Staphylinus complex with sensory peg setae, they are mostly situated on apical to middle portion on the underside of paramere, never stretching far towards the base of paramere. In Cyanocypus gen. nov. the sensory peg setae are widely extended from apical to basal portion of the paramere ( Fig. 3 E View FIGURE 3 ). This character state seems to be an autapomorphy of the new genus Cyanocypus gen. nov., but this requires further study.
Brunke & Smetana (2019) characterized the major lineages of subtribe Staphylinina and according the abovementioned characters of Cyanocypus gen. nov., it is possible to include this new genus in the Ocypus group.
Etymology. The new genus name Cyanocypus (masc.) is derived from the combination of the Greek term Cyan- (dark blue) and Ocypus (the known genus name used for a long time).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |