Prionus (Prionus) lecontei Lameere, 1912
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4134.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:92AC0E20-F532-4D21-AE1F-4B056327212F |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5066969 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AA87AC-FF8A-674A-FF2C-C4232BA38188 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Prionus (Prionus) lecontei Lameere, 1912 |
status |
|
Prionus (Prionus) lecontei Lameere, 1912 View in CoL
( Figs. 49–51 View FIGURES 20 – 51 , 130–132 View FIGURES 128 – 132. 128 – 129 )
Prionus Le Contei Lameere, 1912a: 244 View in CoL ; 1913: 78 (cat.); 1919: 139.
Prionus lecontei View in CoL ; Leng, 1927: 39 (cat.); Linsley, 1935b: 161 (distr.); Hovore & Giesbert, 1976: 350 (host); Hovore, 1988: 3 (distr.); Chemsak et al., 1992: 21 (checklist); Noguera & Chemsak, 1996: 396 (distr.); Linsley & Chemsak, 1997: 424 (host); Monné, 2002: 25 (host); Monné & Hovore, 2005: 20 (checklist); 2006: 19 (checklist); Swiecki & Bernhardt, 2006: 66; Barbour et al., 2011: 588–591; Rodstein et al., 2011: 114, 119–123.
Prionus (Prionus) lecontei View in CoL ; Linsley, 1962: 45; Monné & Giesbert, 1994: 15 (checklist); Monné, 1995: 53 (cat.); Chemsak, 1996: 108; Monné, 2006: 87 View Cited Treatment (cat.); Özdikmen & Turgut, 2009: 411; Bezark & Monné, 2013: 28 (checklist); Monné, 2015: 176 (cat.).
Prionus californicus lecontei View in CoL ; Leng, 1920: 266 (cat.).
Male ( Figs. 130, 132 View FIGURES 128 – 132. 128 – 129 ). Integument reddish-brown, slightly darker dorsally, especially on head (often also ventrally), pronotum, and basal one-third of elytra; antennae from reddish-brown to dark-brown, usually lighter toward apex; legs from reddish-brown to brown, margined with dark-brown or black. Head, excluding mandibles, from 1.0 to 1.2 times as long as prothorax at central area, moderately elongate behind eyes (distance from posterior ocular edge to the prothorax from 0.5 to 0.9 times length of upper eye lobe, typically smaller in small specimens). Longitudinal dorsal furrow distinct from clypeus to near anterior margin of prothorax (sometimes reaching prothorax), always less distinct toward prothorax. Frons short, smooth, shining, glabrous. Area on each side of longitudinal furrow, between antennal tubercles and middle of eyes, deeply sulcate, coarsely, moderately abundantly punctate (usually with confluent punctures). Area close to ocular carinae coarsely, confluently punctate, with short, sparse setae. Central area between middle of eyes and anterior margin of prothorax moderately finely, sparsely punctate; glabrous or with very short, sparse setae; lateral areas between eyes and prothorax with punctures slightly coarser, denser than on central area, with short, moderately sparse setae. Area behind upper eye lobes moderately finely, abundantly punctate (punctures denser and slightly coarser toward lower eye lobes); with short, moderately abundant setae. Area behind lower eye lobes finely rugose, with short, moderately sparse setae toward prothorax, with brush of moderately short setae close to eye. Antennal tubercles nearly contiguous on base; finely, sparsely punctate (usually smooth at apex), but sometimes with fine, dense punctures anteriorly close to clypeus. Postclypeus narrow, moderately finely, abundantly, confluently punctate laterally, gradually sparser toward center; with short, sparse setae laterally, glabrous centrally. Anteclypeus shining, glabrous, impunctate. Labrum with very long, abundant setae. Eyes large; distance between upper eye lobes from 0.40 to 0.55 times length of scape; distance between lower eye lobes from 0.4 to 0.5 times length of scape. Submentum trapezoid, slightly depressed, rugose, with short, sparse setae; anterior edge distinctly carinate. Apex of labial palpi not attaining middle of maxillary palpomere IV. Antennae with 13 segments; attaining from distal one-third to distal one-fourth of elytra. Scape clearly not attaining posterior ocular edge, slightly enlarged toward apex; finely, sparsely punctate dorsally (denser on basal one-third); punctures on latero-outer side slightly coarser than dorsally. Antennomere III from 1.1 to 1.2 times longer than scape dorsally, distinctly enlarged toward apex (distal width from 2.2 to 2.9 times basal width); on dorsal view, imbrication distinct, projected ( Fig. 49 View FIGURES 20 – 51 ); on ventral view ( Fig. 50, 51 View FIGURES 20 – 51 ), imbrication forming two distinct lobes, separated by deep emargination, with outermost largest, slightly emarginate at level of carina; finely, sparsely punctate on basal one-half dorsally, (sometimes only basal one-third), microsculptured toward apex (sometimes with smooth, small area at apex). Remaining antennomeres microsculptured dorsally. Antennomere IV from 0.75 to 0.90 times as long as III. Imbrication of antennomeres IV– XII as in III, but usually with deeper emargination of outermost lobe.
Maximum prothoracic width slightly smaller than elytral base; anterolateral angle spined (spine long), with anterior margin straight or slightly rounded; lateral spine very long, projected backwards; posterolateral angle acute, distinctly projected. Pronotum somewhat flat centrally; disc very finely, moderately abundantly punctate, finely punctate laterally, but distinctly coarser than center of disc; with sparse, short setae laterally (also, sometimes with very sparse setae on central area). Prosternum finely and sparsely asperate; with long, moderately abundant setae. Elytra finely, abundantly punctate; each elytron with three carinae (innermost two most distinct); sutural apex with short spine.
Ventrites almost smooth; ventrite I usually with short setae on basal one-third. Pro- and mesotarsomeres I–II with short spine at apex (shorter in protarsomeres); apex of metatarsomeres I–II distinctly projected (usually slightly spined).
Female. Not examined.
Dimensions in mm (male). Total length (including mandibles), 34.5–46.5; prothoracic length at center, 4.2– 6.2; widest prothoracic width, 11.1–15.4; humeral width, 11.5–17.0; elytral length, 24.7–33.6.
Geographical distribution. Canada [British Columbia ( Linsley, 1962)], USA [California (Lameere, 1912)], Mexico [Baja California ( Hovore, 1988)].
Type, type locality. Described from USA, California, based on three syntypes (two males and one female) deposited at NHMW.
We designate as lectotype the male ( Fig. 130 View FIGURES 128 – 132. 128 – 129 ) with the following labels ( Fig. 131 View FIGURES 128 – 132. 128 – 129 ):
White (Handwritten): Le Contei / [male symbol] / type / Lam. White (Handwritten): Pars. / 858.
Red (Printed): TYPUS
Red (Printed), added by us: LECTOTYPE / Prionus lecontei / Lameere, 1912.
Material examined. USA, California: Dunlap (Fresco County), 9 males, VII.2.1973, Doug Whitman col. ( ESSIG); Joshua Tree, 1 male, VI.25.1960, E. L. Sleeper col. ( MZSP); Oakland (Alameda County), 1 male, VI.1937, [no collector indicated] ( ESSIG); 25 miles NE Redding (Shasta County), 1 male, VII.14.1960 (no collector indicated) ( MZSP); Santa Clara County, 1 male, VII.1973, Doug Whitman col. ( ESSIG); Trabuco Oaks (Orange County), 1 male, VII.15.1977, D. W. Jordan col. ( ESSIG).
Remarks. Leng (1920), without any explanation, considered P. lecontei as a subspecies of P. californicus . Linsley (1935b) recorded: “ P. lecontei is not a variety or synonym of P. californicus as it has been placed by recent writers, but is a very distinct species. It differs markedly from californicus in having thirteen-segmented rather than twelve-segmented antennae, with the external processes of segments four to eleven very strongly produced and longer than the segments to which they are attached (in californicus the processes are shorter than the segments on which they occur).” However, Linsley (1962) suggested the possibility of synonym between P. lecontei and P. californicus : “The status of this form is perplexing. I have seen specimens from about a dozen localities, sometimes captured along with typical californicus . The characters which separate the two suggest that they represent distinct species. However heterogony may be involved.” For the time being, there is no reason to affirm that both are the same species.
According to Lameere (1912a), this species differs from P. californicus [translation]: “by the lobes of third article of hind tarsi just angular and not dentate at apex; by the process of ventrite I wide and rounded in female; by the metasternum glabrous in female; by the sculpture of the elytra more finely rugose, with punctures more or less visible; by the antennae shorter and more tumid, with 13 segments in both sexes, with outer process of the articles very developed.” However, the apex of metatarsomere in some specimens of P. californicus is similar to specimens of P. lecontei . The antennae, as in P. californicus , are variable in length and frequently have equal length in both species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Prionus (Prionus) lecontei Lameere, 1912
Santos-Silva, Antonio, Nearns, Eugenio H. & Swift, Ian P. 2016 |
Prionus (Prionus) lecontei
Bezark 2013: 28 |
Ozdikmen 2009: 411 |
Monne 2006: 87 |
Monne 1994: 15 |
Linsley 1962: 45 |
Prionus lecontei
Swiecki 2006: 66 |
Monne 2005: 20 |
Linsley 1997: 424 |
Noguera 1996: 396 |
Chemsak 1992: 21 |
Hovore 1988: 3 |
Hovore 1976: 350 |
Linsley 1935: 161 |
Leng 1927: 39 |
Prionus californicus lecontei
Leng 1920: 266 |
Prionus Le Contei Lameere, 1912a : 244
Lameere 1912: 244 |