Porcellio Latreille, 1804
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4311.1.9 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A6AC2A49-CA43-480A-B10D-A66F19E23232 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6010718 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AA879F-CB7F-BD71-EFBB-0148FE1CFCCF |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Porcellio Latreille, 1804 |
status |
|
Genus Porcellio Latreille, 1804 View in CoL
Type species: Porcellio scaber Latreille, 1804
Diagnosis. A member of the genus Porcellio can be diagnosed by the enlarged pleon-epimera constituting continuous outline with the pereon; pereon-epimera I with cocave posterolateral margins; head with welldeveloped lateral lobes; eyes with more than 20 ommatidia; telson triangular with concave lateral margins; pleopod exopodites I–II with monospiracular covered lungs and no conglobation ability ( Schmalfuss & Ferrara 1978, Schmalfuss 1992).
Remarks. The genus Porcellio is a large taxonomic group that cannot be defined by a single character. Indeed, none of the above mentioned features satisfactorily diagnose the genus ( Schmalfuss 1992). Schmalfuss (1998) considered Porcellio as a paraphyletic group including two different linages that have been united due to convergent evolution. According to him, “the north African laevis-hoffmannseggi -group defined by elongated male pleopod exopodites, probably should be considered a separate genus which then must be called Rogopus Budde- Lund, 1908”. The northern Mediterranean scaber-obsolotus -group is diagnosed by short pleopod exopodites that includes also west Asian species ( Schmalfuss 1992). Obviously, a revision of the genus Porcellio is required to be divided to more natural genera.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |