Leucogeorgia golovatchi, Antić & Reip, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2020.713 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A6CB58F5-1ECC-47F0-AA07-798844AF80A7 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4335818 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AFC4B93A-128A-4FF6-9E97-726F4DDE4CA1 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:AFC4B93A-128A-4FF6-9E97-726F4DDE4CA1 |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Leucogeorgia golovatchi |
status |
sp. nov. |
Leucogeorgia golovatchi View in CoL sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:AFC4B93A-128A-4FF6-9E97-726F4DDE4CA1
Figs 22–24 View Fig View Fig View Fig , 56 View Fig , 58 View Fig
Diagnosis
This species belongs to the group of Leucogeorgia spp. with neither modified mouthparts nor teeth on the mesomeral claw (vs teeth present in L. abchasica , L. borealis sp. nov., L. gioi sp. nov., L. oculata sp. nov. and L. satunini ). Leucogeorgia golovatchi sp. nov. differs from L. lobata sp. nov. by the absence of a strongly developed lobe on the mesomeral lamella (vs presence of a strongly developed lobe in L. lobata sp. nov.). Leucogeorgia golovatchi sp. nov. differs from L. prometheus sp. nov. by both a shorter mesomeral claw and a long solenomere clearly exceeding the height of the mesomeral lamella (vs a longer mesomeral claw and a short solenomere not exceeding the height of the mesomeral lamella in L. prometheus sp. nov.). Additionally, L. golovatchi sp. nov. clearly differs from all other congeners by having strongly developed ventral lobes on body ring 2 in both sexes (vs absence of such lobes in all other congeners).
Etymology
This new species is dedicated to Sergei Golovatch, one of the collectors, a well-known diplopodologist worldwide, and our good friend and colleague. His collection of millipedes from the Caucasus, now in ZMUM, is one of the largest and most complete. Noun in the genitive case.
Material examined
Holotype
CENTRAL-WEST GEORGIA – Racha-Lechkhumi • ♂; Ambrolauri District , near Gogoleti, Tsakhi (= Gogoleti) Cave ; 42.54° N, 42.90° E; 30 Jul. 1939; J. Birstein leg.; ZMUM.
GoogleMapsParatypes
CENTRAL-WEST GEORGIA – Racha-Lechkhumi • 8 ♂♂, 1 ♀, 6 juvs; same collection data as for holotype; ZMUM GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; same collection data as for holotype; IZB GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; same collection data as for holotype; SMNG GoogleMaps ; • 7 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀, 7 juvs (mainly fragmented); same collection data as for holotype but 9 Aug. 1974; S.I. Golovatch leg.; ZMUM GoogleMaps .
Description
SIZE AND NUMBER OF BODY RINGS. Holotype male 25 mm long, vertical diameter of largest body ring 1.6 mm, body with 50 podous rings + 1 apodous ring + telson. Paratype males 22–29 mm long, vertical diameter of largest body ring 1.3–1.8 mm, body with 43–52 podous rings + 0–2 apodous rings + telson. Paratype females 21–29 mm long, vertical diameter of largest body ring 1.3–1.8 mm, body with 46–50 podous rings + 1 apodous ring + telson.
COLOUR ( Fig. 22 View Fig ). Yellowish white in alcohol.
HEAD ( Figs 22B View Fig , 23C View Fig ). Without ommatidia. Frontal setae absent. Labrum with three labral teeth, four supralabral setae and 15 labral setae. Gnathochilarium with rhomboid promentum. Lamellae linguales with 5+5 setae, stipites with 3+3 distolateral and 11+11 medial setae. Antennae 2.3 mm long in holotype
male, their length ca 140% of vertical diameter of largest body ring. Lengths of antennomeres I–VIII (in mm): 0.12 (I), 0.47 (II), 0.41 (III), 0.4 (IV), 0.46 (V), 0.29 (VI), 0.12 (VII) and 0.03 (VIII). Length/width ratio of antennomeres I–VII: 0.8 (I), 3 (II), 3 (III), 2.7 (IV), 2.4 (V), 1.6 (VI) and 0.9 (VII). Antennomeres
V and VI each with a terminal corolla of large sensilla basiconica bacilliformia; antennomere VII with a terminal corolla of small sensilla basiconica bacilliformia.
BODY RINGS ( Fig. 22 View Fig D–F). Entire metazonal area with longitudinal striations. Length of midbody setae ca 5% of vertical diameter of rings. Body ring 2 with strongly developed ventral lobes ( Fig. 22B View Fig , E–F), rounded in lateral view.
TELSON ( Fig. 22C View Fig ). Epiproct with a very short and blunt preanal process, covered with dorsal and lateral setae. Paraprocts rounded, with numerous setae. Hypoproct without any modifications.
LEGS IN MALES. First pair of legs modified, hook-shaped ( Figs 23 View Fig A–B, 24D–E), with three complete podomeres; coxa with one seta; prefemur with 8–10 setae; femur, postfemur and tibiotarsus coalesced; femur with 2–3 setae; postfemur with one seta. Tibiotarsus with a short distal lobe (tarsal remnant). Tip slightly tuberculated. Postfemoral and tibial ventral pads well-developed on anterior legs, then gradually disappearing towards posterior legs.
PENES ( Fig. 24C View Fig ). In form of a short trapezoid, apically with two small subtriangular lobes.
VENTRAL MARGIN OF MALE BODY RING 7 ( Fig. 22G View Fig ). Small, rounded in lateral view.
GONOPODS ( Figs 23D View Fig , 24 View Fig A–B). Promere (p) long and slender, with a flagellum (f); apical part with poorly denticulated margins; basal half with two developed ridges. Mesomere (m) with a slender mesomeral claw (mc) lacking teeth; mesomeral lamella (ml) gradually decreasing in height posteriad, distal margin serrate, posterior part finely fimbriate. Opisthomere (o) bipartite. Anterior branch of o with a solenomere (s) with a long tip exceeding posterior part of lamella, and a well-developed and fimbriate velum (v). Posterior branch of o in form of a shield-like protective lamella (pl). Mesomere and opisthomere connected basally with an accessory membrane (am).
Distribution
Known only from its type locality ( Fig. 58 View Fig , orange triangle).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |