Anoplodactylus sp. 8
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2022.851.1999 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7317EA8C-7C05-4E24-A38C-30F860013694 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A95E06-3E78-FFD9-FD60-07060048BD5B |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Anoplodactylus sp. 8 |
status |
|
Fig. 27 View Fig
Anoplodactylus sp. 8 – Sabroux et al. 2019b: tab. 1, fig. 3.
Material examined
MARTINIQUE • 1 ♀; Canal de Ste Lucie ; 14°23.1ʹ N, 60°50.2ʹ W; depth 65 m; 11 Sep. 2016; st. AD224; MNHN-IU-2016-539/ MK411113 View Materials GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; Baie de St-Pierre ; 14°45.1ʹ N, 61°11ʹ W; depth 17 m; 4 Oct. 2016; st. AB388; MNHN-IU-2016-1060/ MK411039 View Materials GoogleMaps .
Remarks
These two specimens were collected on the Caribbean coast and southern Martinique; only females are available, preventing us from providing a complete description. The specimens differ from other species of Anoplodactylus by the combination of the following characters: body stout; ocular tubercle low, rounded; trunk without dorsomedian ornamentation; lateral processes well separated by less than their own diameter, and without ornamentation; proboscis barrel-shaped, truncated; legs stout; no propodal lamina; auxillary claw minute. The specimens strongly resemble A. pycnosoma ( Helfer, 1938) , a species only recorded in the Indo-Pacific ( Bamber 2000), from which it differs by the absence of angulate distal projections on the proboscis; it also differs from A. dentimanus Stock, 1979 from the West Indies ( Stock 1979) by the greater space between the lateral processes, the more elongate chela palms and the truncated proboscis end. Finally, the specimens are similar to Anoplodactylus nanus Krapp, Koçak & Katagan, 2008 from the Eastern Mediterranean ( Krapp et al. 2008), except that their low dorsodistal femoral tubercles carry one seta.
Depth range
17– 65 m.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |