Argosadalia, Vandenberg, 2019
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4712.3.7 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:80BBA2AF-DDE8-456E-B983-3DA4F66A7181 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5944550 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A887B7-8238-FE1A-FF79-A6029335FAB3 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Argosadalia |
status |
gen. nov. |
Argosadalia gen. nov.
( Figs. 1–7 View FIGURES 1–10 , 11 View FIGURES 11–14 a–e, 15–18)
type species: Argosadalia priscilla sp. nov.
Diagnosis. Distinguished from other members of the Neda group by a combination of: body oval, small-sized, with length 5.2 mm or less, elytral margins narrowly but distinctly explanate, with marginal bead ( Figs. 1–4 View FIGURES 1–10 , 11a, d View FIGURES 11–14 ). Prosternal intercoxal process lacking carinae. Elytral epipleuron ( Fig 11b, d View FIGURES 11–14 ) narrow, with maximum width about 1/7 width of body, subhorizontal in anterior half, planar to weakly concave. Hind margin of abdominal ventrites 1–4 (inclusive of flexure bands) sublinear when abdomen is held flat ( Figs. 11b, c View FIGURES 11–14 ); postcoxal line of first abdominal ventrite joined to oblique line and obliterated beyond, forming modified V shape ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 1–10 , 11b View FIGURES 11–14 ). Basal lobe of male genitalia widest before apex, apically bifurcate, terminating in pair of parallel tapered projections separated by Ushaped emargination ( Fig. 11e View FIGURES 11–14 , 16 View FIGURES 15–19 ). Spermatheca of female genitalia ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 15–19 ) with nodulus joined to cornu to form distinct outer angle, shaped like the number “2,” but with apex of nodulus tapered distally, slightly down-curved at point of attachment to spermduct.
Remarks. Within the Neda -group the new genus resembles some of the smaller members of Neoharmonia , but the latter have the prosternal intercoxal process with a pair of convergent carinae separated by a triangular depression, abdominal postcoxal line continued laterally beyond the juncture with the oblique line ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 1–10 ), basal lobe of male genitalia with the apex undivided ( Fig. 12e View FIGURES 11–14 ), and female spermatheca with a long straight tapered nodulus that flows directly from the cornu without a distinct outer angle ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 15–19 ).
The genus Neda has the same form of the female spermathecal capsule as the new genus and is probably closely related. However, it can be easily distinguished ( Figs. 13 View FIGURES 11–14 a–e) by the larger body size (5.2–10.0 mm in length), broadly explanate elytral margin, epipleuron strongly concave and steeply descending externally, from about ¼–1/3 body width at widest part, hind margin of abdominal ventrite 4 distinctly arcuately emarginate in both sexes, and the basal lobe of the male genitalia widened apically, with projections diverging distally. Mononeda ( Figs. 14 View FIGURES 11–14 a–e) also falls within the “ Neda -group” and differs from the new genus by the much larger body size (length 7.5–12.4 mm), complete lack of an elytral marginal bead, elytral margin broadly explanate, and elytral epipleuron very wide, concave and descending externally, from about 1/3–1/2 body width at widest part, with ventral epipleural carina complete to apex.
The new genus superficially resembles the Holarctic genus Adalia in its relatively small size, general body shape, and similar form of the abdominal postcoxal line ( Figs. 7, 8 View FIGURES 1–10 ), but Adalia males have an undivided basal lobe, and a differently shaped penis with a strongly pigmented penis capsule. Adalia females have a smaller spermathecal accessory gland and the spermduct with a more robust and heavily sclerotized sheath.
Etymology. Argosadalia (gender feminine) formed from a combination of Argos (= shining, bright, from Greek) + Adalia (= noble, from Hebrew). In Greek mythology, Argos was the name of the hundred-eyed servant of the goddess Hera, who had eyes all over his body. This name was selected because of the numerous white spots on the elytra which resemble eyes. The second part of the name was used because of the superficial similarity of this lady beetle to members of the lady beetle genus Adalia .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Coccinellinae |
Tribe |
Coccinellini |