Clinopodes caucasicus ( Sseliwanoff, 1884 )

Dyachkov, Yurii V., 2024, An annotated checklist of the Chilopoda from Azerbaijan, Ecologica Montenegrina 71, pp. 301-316 : 305

publication ID	https://doi.org/ 10.37828/em.2024.71.33
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A7E128-837A-9053-D48B-FDECFB38FBC2
treatment provided by	Felipe
scientific name	Clinopodes caucasicus ( Sseliwanoff, 1884 )
status

Treatment

3. Clinopodes caucasicus ( Sseliwanoff, 1884)

Geophilus caucasicus Sseliwanoff 1881b: 6 View in CoL ; 1884: 85.

Geophilus caucasicus View in CoL – Muralewicz 1907: 338; Samedov et al. 1976: 75; Bababekova 1996: 91.

Geophilus transmontanus Sseliwanoff 1884: 86 View in CoL .

Geophilus transmontanus View in CoL – Samedov et al. 1976: 76; Muralewicz 1907: 338.

Clinopodes caucasicus – Bonato et al. 2011: 183; Korobushkin et al. 2016: 15; Volkova 2016: 671; Zuev 2016: 34; Zuev & Evsyukov 2016: 423; Dyachkov et al. 2022b: 71.

Previous records. “Caucasus Major” (as Geophilus transmontanus, Samedov et al. 1976 View in CoL ; Bababekova 1996) and “Caucasus Minor” (as Geophilus transmontanus, Samedov et al. 1976 View in CoL ; Bababekova 1996); Shaki: [4] ( Sseliwanoff 1884; Muralewicz 1907), Aghstafa: [7], and Ganja: [15] (as G. transmontanus, Sseliwanoff 1884 View in CoL ; Muralewicz 1907) districts.

Distribution. Caucasus and Eastern Anatolia ( Bonato et al. 2011; Dyachkov et al. 2022b).

Remarks. The name Geophilus caucasicus was introduced as a nomen nudum by Sseliwanoff (1881b), with the corresponding description provided later ( Sseliwanoff 1884).

G. transmontanus was synonymized under G. caucasicus by Muralewicz (1926).