Vidronovella elegantula, Ernst & Fernández & Fernández-Martínez & Vera, 2012
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/g2012n4a1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A6D074-FFF6-7E0A-FF37-FA2DFC19F93A |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Vidronovella elegantula |
status |
sp. nov. |
Vidronovella elegantula n. sp. ( Figs 15 View FIG D-I; 16A, B; Appendix)
ETYMOLOGY. — The species name “ elegantula ” refers to the small size and general delicate appearance of the new species (derived from Latin “elegans” = elegant).
HOLOTYPE. — SMF 21.294 About SMF .
PARATYPES. — SMF 21.295- SMF 21.412.
TYPE LOCALITY. — Arauz Sur (Arroyo section), Province of Palencia, NW-Spain (Cantabrian Mountains).
TYPE HORIZON. — Lebanza Formation, Lower Devonian (Pragian).
DIAGNOSIS. — Branched colonies; bifurcation common; single superior and single inferior hemisepta well developed; paurostyles absent; 4-6 acanthostyles surrounding each autozooecial aperture; heterozooecia absent; mural spines absent.
DESCRIPTION
Branches 0.59-0.96 mm in diameter, with 0.23- 0.49 mm wide endozones and 0.16-0.26 mm wide exozones. Branch bifurcation common. Transverse sections of branches circular. Autozooecia short, budding from distinct medial axis in spiral order at angles of 45-60°. Autozooecial diaphragms absent. Superior hemiseptum moderately long, hook-shaped, curved proximally; inferior hemiseptum long, slender, occupying two-thirds of body cavity of autozooecia, positioned beneath superior hemisepta, inclined distally, widened laterally. Autozooecial apertures oval, arranged regularly in alternating rows on the colony surface. Walls in the endozone granular, 0.005 -0.010 mm thick; laminated in exozone. Acanthostyles having distinct hyaline cores and wide laminated sheaths, regularly sized, single or two positioned between two longitudinally successive autozooecial apertures, 4-6 surrounding each aperture. Acanthostyles often sealed by a thick layer of laminated skeleton on the colony surface. Mural spines absent.
COMPARISON
Vidronovella elegantula n. sp. differs from V. fastigiata Gorjunova, 2006 View in CoL in having of 4-6 instead of 4 acanthostyles surrounding each autozooecial aperture, and from V. intricata Ernst, 2011 View in CoL in the absence of mural spines and in the presence of single hemisepta instead of the double hemisepta found in V. intricata View in CoL .
SMF |
Forschungsinstitut und Natur-Museum Senckenberg |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Vidronovella elegantula
Ernst, Andrej, Fernández, Luis Pedro, Fernández-Martínez, Esperanza & Vera, Carmen 2012 |
Vidronovella elegantula
Ernst & Fernández & Fernández-Martínez & Vera 2012 |
V. intricata
Ernst 2011 |
V. intricata
Ernst 2011 |
V. fastigiata
Gorjunova 2006 |