Hylaeamys yunganus (Thomas, 1902)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4876.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:190EC586-E14B-4AEF-A5EF-3DA401656159 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4424120 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A587ED-3223-FFC9-83E9-FF502F85FD41 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Hylaeamys yunganus |
status |
|
Hylaeamys yunganus View in CoL
Karyotype: 2n = 58 and FN = 62. Autosomal complement: three small metacentric pairs, and 25 acrocentric pairs large to small decreasing in size. Sex chromosomes: X, a large acrocentric; Y, a small acrocentric ( Gardner & Patton 1976, pp. 6, Fig. 2B View FIGURE 2 ; Patton et al. 2000; Volobouev & Aniskin 2000). C-banding metaphases exhibited blocks of constitutive heterochromatin on the pericentromeric region of all autosomes and on the X chromosome. G-banding was also performed ( Volobouev & Aniskin 2000).
A different karyotype was reported by Gardner & Patton (1976), with 2n = 60 and FN = 66, the karyotype of this form was nearly identical to that one mentioned before except for the presence of a small metacentric pair. Another karyotype with 2n = 60 and NF = 64 was reported by Andrades-Miranda et al. (2000). This karyotype was similar to the one reported by Gardner & Patton (1976) (2n = 60, FN = 66), the difference was due to one more acrocentric pair and one less small biarmed pair, resulting in a FN = 64. Samples from Suriname presented a diploid number from 52 to 59 and fundamental number from 64 to 67 ( Koop et al. 1983; Kerridge & Baker 1990). The variation in diploid and fundamental number of samples from Suriname occurs sympatrically, whereas the others karyotypes reported for the genus represent different populations ( Table 5, Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.