Monodelphis (Monodelphiops) dimidiata (Wagner, 1847)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/0003-0090.455.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7161485 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A487D6-FFDE-FFCD-AF90-3A77FEEAFC84 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Monodelphis (Monodelphiops) dimidiata |
status |
|
Monodelphis (Monodelphiops) dimidiata View in CoL
( Wagner, 1847)
TYPE MATERIAL AND TYPE LOCALITY: BMNH 55.12 .24.72, the holotype by monotypy, consists of the skin and skull of a very old adult male collected at Maldonado (34.90° S, 54.95° W; at sea level), Maldonado department, Uruguay GoogleMaps .
SYNONYMS: brevicaudis Olfers, 1818 (see Remarks, below); fosteri Thomas, 1924; henseli Thomas, 1888; itatiayae Miranda-Ribeiro, 1936; lundi Matschie, 1916; paulensis Vieira, 1950 ; sorex Hensel, 1872 .
DISTRIBUTION: Monodelphis dimidiata occurs in a variety of forested and open habitats in southeastern Brazil, eastern Paraguay, northeastern Argentina, and Uruguay ( Vilela et al., 2010: fig. 2).
REMARKS: Monodelphis dimidiata and M. sorex were considered distinct species by Pine and Handley (2008), but Vilela et al. (2010) summarized molecular and morphometric evidence that they are conspecific. As discussed elsewhere ( Voss et al., 2009a; Vilela et al., 2010), brevicaudis is probably a senior synonym, but it should not be used to replace either of these long-established names.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |