Brachypsectra kadleci Hájek, 2010
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2017.276 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:603DDB0C-081B-4002-8001-A3386D53CAB0 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3845879 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A48798-F759-FF88-FE44-FA60FA95FE4D |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Brachypsectra kadleci Hájek, 2010 |
status |
|
Brachypsectra kadleci Hájek, 2010
Figs 1 View Fig A–D; 2A, D–E
Brachypsectra kadleci Hájek, 2010: 30 .
Diagnosis
Males
Body 4.8–5.9 mm long, 2.3–2.5 times as long as wide. Body surface testaceous, with elytra either darker, reddish-brown to dark brown (specimens from western Iran, including the holotype; Fig. 1 View Fig A–B) or yellowish-testaceous to testaceous (populations from southern Iran; Fig. 1 View Fig C–D), legs yellow to yellowish-testaceous. Eyes large, minimum interocular distance 0.95–1.05 times maximum eye diameter. Pronotum 1.8–1.9 times wider than long, subtrapezoidal, widest posteriorly, width between posterior angles 1.5–1.7 times width between anterior angles; lateral sides convex, strongly converging anteriorly and moderately strongly diverging posteriorly; posterior angles produced posteriorly and slightly to moderately laterally, apically truncated, with short distinct posterior carina, well separated from lateral carina in dorsal view ( Figs 1 View Fig A–D, 2A). Scutellum subtrapezoidal, with apex narrowly rounded. Aedeagus with median lobe more or less gradually converging apically, more distinctly attenuating subapically in specimens from Lorestan (including the holotype); parameres slightly constricted subapically, with distinct subapical, rounded lateral projection and projected rounded apex. Phallobase short, narrowed and slightly emarginated basally, almost sub-parallel apically ( Fig. 2 View Fig D–E). Female unknown. For the differences between B. kadleci and B. jaechi sp. nov. see the Diagnosis section under the latter species.
Material examined
Holotype
IRAN: ♂, W Iran, Lorestan Prov., 10 km SW of Dorud , 33°26' N, 49°00' E, alt. 1431 m, 9 Jul. 2004, S. Kadlec leg., ex coll. S. Kadlec ( NMPC).
GoogleMapsOther material examined
IRAN: 2 ♂♂, W Iran, Lorestan Prov., 25 km NWW of Dorud, 33º33' N, 48º53' E, alt. 1874 m, 8 Jul. 2004, S. Kadlec leg. ( NMPC); 6 ♂♂, S Iran, Bezan, 15 km NW of Furk, alt. 1000–1400 m, 28–29 May 1973, Loc. no. 218, Exped. Nat. Mus. Praha [see Hoberlandt 1981] ( NMPC); 2 ♂♂, S Iran, alt. 400 m, 6 km W of Geno, 7–9 May 1977, Loc. no. 323, Exped. Nat. Mus. Praha [see Hoberlandt 1983] ( NMPC); ♂, S Iran, 25 km S of Minab, 4 May 1974, Lichtlang (27), Exped. Mus. Vindob, Pretzmann leg. ( NMPC); ♂, Iran, Hormozgán Prov., Mts. Zagros, Tezerj, alt. 280 m, 28°13.823' N, 55°48.744' E, by light, 1–2 May 2008, T. Hácz, K. Székely and K. Vig. leg., T. Németh det., 2013 ( HNHM).
Distribution
This species is known from western and southern Iran ( Fig. 3 View Fig ).
Remarks
There is intraspecific variability in populations of B. kadleci . Specimens from the type locality (Lorestan, western Iran; Fig. 3 View Fig ) are distinctly bicolored with darker elytra ( Fig. 1 View Fig A–B) and have the median lobe of the aedeagus almost sub-parallel, more distinctly attenuating subapically ( Fig. 2D View Fig ). Specimens collected in southern Iran ( Fig. 3 View Fig ) are almost uniformly yellowish-testaceous to testaceous ( Fig. 1 View Fig C–D), with the median lobe of the aedeagus more gradually narrowed towards the apex ( Fig. 2E View Fig ). Taking into consideration the gradation in elytral coloration (from yellowish-testaceous through testaceous and reddish-brown to dark brown; Fig. 1 View Fig A–D), slight differences in the shape of the median lobe and the rarity of the specimens available for study, we refrain here from making any taxonomic conclusions and consider all specimens from Iran conspecific. Brachypsectra fulva from North America and Brachypsectra sp. from Australia have even wider distribution ranges (ca 2000 km) than B. kadleci (ca 1000 km), and B. fulva exhibits much wider geographic variation in size and external morphology ( Costa et al. 2006). More material from the different localities in Iran, as well as DNA-based studies, might help to resolve the taxonomic status of the different Iranian populations considered here conservatively as B. kadleci .
NMPC |
National Museum Prague |
HNHM |
Hungarian Natural History Museum (Termeszettudomanyi Muzeum) |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Brachypsectra kadleci Hájek, 2010
Petrzelkova, Ivana, Makris, Christodoulos & Kundrata, Robin 2017 |
Brachypsectra kadleci Hájek, 2010: 30
Hajek J. 2010: 30 |