Scrapter semirufus Cockerell, 1932
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.912.2373 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B1958762-5D89-4DC9-A8CE-AABB06B7979C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10420087 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A4762C-FFFE-CA10-FD89-3298FC97D3F7 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Scrapter semirufus Cockerell, 1932 |
status |
|
Scrapter semirufus Cockerell, 1932
Figs 48–50 View Fig View Fig View Fig
Scrapter semirufa [sic!] Cockerell, 1932a: 452, lectotype ♀ [designated by Eardley 1996] (type locality: Port Elizabeth, South Africa) (NHML), examined.
Diagnosis
The female of S. semirufus can be separated from that of all other species of this group by the following character combination: T3 anterior of premarginal line impunctate ( Fig. 48E View Fig ); T1 anterior of premarginal line with a row of points ( Fig. 48F View Fig ); propodeum completely carinate, matt ( Fig. 48D View Fig ); supraclypeal area squarish ( Fig. 48B View Fig ). The male is characterized by discs of T1–T3 superficially punctate, dense (i <1 d) punctation covers at most basal three quarters of the tergum ( Fig. 49D View Fig ).
Additional material examined (63 specimens)
SOUTH AFRICA • 1 ♀; W Cape, 1 km N of Struisbaai ; 34°47′20″ S, 20°00′10″ E; 27 Sep. 2001; RCMK GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; W Cape, Agulhas ; 34°49′92″ S, 20°00′14″ E; 27 Sep. 2011; RCMK GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; Van Rhyn's Pass ; 31°22′ S, 19°01′ E; 820 m a.s.l.; 11–21 Nov. 1931; AM leg.; NHML GoogleMaps • 3 ♀♀; Camps Bay, Cape Peninsula ; 33°57′ S, 18°22′ E; 5 m a.s.l.; Sep. 1920; RT leg.; NHML GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; Lion's Head, Cape Town; 33°58′ S, 18°23′ E; 5 m a.s.l.; Aug. 1920; RT leg.; NHML GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; 21–31 Jul. 1920; RT leg.; NHML GoogleMaps • 5 ♀♀; Port Elizabeth ; 33°58′ S, 25°36′ E; 80 m a.s.l.; 29 Oct. 1931; JO leg.; NHML GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; same collection data as preceding; RCMK GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; Mossel Bay ; 34°10′ S, 22°07′ E; 60 m a.s.l.; 17 Sep. 1938; RT leg.; NHML GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; 1–14 Nov 1921; RT leg.; NHML GoogleMaps • 12 ♀♀, 2 ♂♂; same collection data as for preceding; Sep. 1921; RT leg.; NHML GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; same collection data as preceding; RCMK GoogleMaps • 5 ♀♀, 1 ♂; same collection data as for preceding; Oct. 1921; RT leg.; NHML GoogleMaps • 5 ♀♀, 18 ♂♂; same collection data as for preceding; Aug. 1932; RT leg.; NHML GoogleMaps • 1 ♀, 1 ♂; same collection data as for preceding; RCMK GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; same collection data as for preceding; Sep. 1933; RT leg.; NHML GoogleMaps .
Description
Female
BODY LENGTH. 8.2–8.4 mm.
HEAD. Wider than long. Integument black, mandibles dark brownish to reddish. Face irregularly and sparsely covered with brownish hair, more densely around the basis of the antennae. Ocelli in line with posterior margin of compound eyes. Clypeus medially with shallow longitudinal depression; punctation fine and regular (i = 1.5–3 d); surface between punctures smooth and shiny ( Fig. 48B View Fig ). Malar area medially narrow, slightly curved. Antennal flagella ventrally yellow, dorsally black. Supraclypeal area at upper margin slightly emarginated and edges slightly extended.
MESOSOMA. Integument black, pronotal lobe dark black. Scutum coarsely and regularly punctate (i = 0.5–1.5 d); surface between punctures smooth and shiny ( Fig. 48C View Fig ). Metanotum about half as long as scutellum. Propodeum with anterior broad and coarse transitional carinae and posterior with fine transverse carinae ( Fig. 48D View Fig ). Scutum, scutellum, metanotum, mesepisternum and propodeum sparsely covered with long, brownish to greyish, erect hair.
WINGS. Yellowish-brown, stigma and wing venation brownish ( Fig. 48A View Fig ).
LEGS. Integument brownish, fore tibia with yellow spot. Vestiture greyish-white, scopa brownish ( Fig. 48A View Fig ).
METASOMA. Integument black; T2–T3 and part of T1 yellowish-brown. T3 anterior of premarginal line at least laterally row of hairs; T4 completely haired, basally more densely and shorter than apically; prepygidial and pygidial fimbriae dark brownish to black ( Fig. 48E View Fig ). T1 impunctate ( Fig. 48F View Fig ); discs of T2–T3 almost impunctate, single shallow punctation at most; T3 anterior of premarginal line with row of points. Surface of metasoma matt ( Fig. 48E View Fig ).
Male
BODY LENGTH. 7.4–8.1 mm.
HEAD. Wider than long. Integument black, mandibles dark brownish to reddish. Face densely covered with long, white, erect hair. Ocelli slightly behind posterior margin of compound eyes. Malar area medially narrow, slightly curved. Antennal flagella ventrally yellow, dorsally black.
MESOSOMA. Integument black, pronotal lobe dark brownish to black. Scutum irregularly punctate, laterally denser (i ~ 0.5 d) than medially (i ~ 1 d); surface between punctures smooth and shiny ( Fig. 49C View Fig ). Propodeum basolaterally with coarse carinae, medially rugulose-areolate ( Fig. 49D View Fig ). Scutum, scutellum, metanotum, mesepisternum and propodeum sparsely covered with long, brownish to greyish, erect hair.
WINGS. Yellowish-brown, stigma and wing venation brownish ( Fig. 49A View Fig ).
LEGS. Integument brownish, fore and mid tibia with yellow spot. Vestiture greyish-white ( Fig. 49A View Fig ).
METASOMA. Integument brownish, marginal zone yellowish-brown shimmering. Disc of T1 without hair ( Fig. 50A View Fig ), T2–T4 basolaterally greyish, sparse, short, erect hair field; T2–T4 anterior of premarginal line with row of short, erect, greyish hair ( Fig. 49D View Fig ). T1 regularly (i = 1–1.5 d) punctate ( Fig. 50A View Fig ). T2– T4 basally more densely (i = 0.5 d) and finer punctate than apically (i = 1–2 d); medially more densely than laterally; dense punctation of T2 covers half of tergum; T2–T3 anterior of premarginal line with row of points; surface between punctures smooth and shiny ( Fig. 49D View Fig ).
TERMINALIA. Genitalia ( Fig. 50B View Fig ), S7 ( Fig. 50C View Fig ) and terminal plate of S8 ( Fig. 50D View Fig ) as illustrated.
Distribution
Coastal areas in the south of the Greater Cape Floristic Region.
Floral hosts
Unknown.
Seasonal activity
September.
Remarks
Eardley (1996) synonymised this species with S. nitidus .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Scrapter semirufus Cockerell, 1932
Mack, Anne & Kuhlmann, Michael 2023 |
Scrapter semirufa
Cockerell T. D. A. 1932: 452 |