Scrapter nitidus (Friese, 1909)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2023.912.2373 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B1958762-5D89-4DC9-A8CE-AABB06B7979C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10420002 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A4762C-FFB9-CA5D-FF71-33A2FDDBD50F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2023-12-19 09:18:43, last updated 2024-11-26 03:15:01) |
scientific name |
Scrapter nitidus |
status |
|
The Scrapter nitidus View in CoL species group
A brief summary of Scrapter species group concepts, in particular the problematic history of the S. nitidus species group, was provided in the introduction. The focus here is on a revised and more consistent morphological definition of this taxon to accommodate species previously placed in other groups. The new broadened concept is also supported by unpublished preliminary molecular phylogenetic data. Eardley's (1996: 42–43) detailed diagnosis of the S. nitidus species group mostly refers to characters of limited diagnostic value when critically assessed based on the far richer Scrapter material available today. Exceptions are the medio-longitudinal depression of the clypeus and the narrow facial fovea.
Following the new definition, species of the S. nitidus species group are:
A) Medium-sized bees of usually 7–9 mm (range about 6–11 mm) body length and
B) characterized by deep and coarse punctation of head and mesosoma (e.g., Figs 26B View Fig , 39B–C View Fig ).
In combination with at least three of the following features:
C) Clypeus with medio-longitudinal depression (e.g., Figs 13B View Fig , 15C View Fig ) (clypeus convex: S. flavipes , S. convexus sp. nov.; clypeus flat: S. flavostictus , S. caeruleus sp. nov.).
D) Facial fovea almost linear and narrow, bottom barely visible (e.g., Figs 5B View Fig , 39B View Fig ) (facial fovea broader: S. basutorum , S. flavipes ).
E) Basal part of propodeum ± horizontal.
F) Males: Metasoma slender ± parallel-sided, about three times as long as broad (less distinct in S. basutorum subgroup and S. confusus subgroup).
G) Males: S7 apicolateral lobes reduced (e.g., Figs 6F View Fig , 18F View Fig ) (S7 with small apicolateral lobes: S. felicis sp. nov., S. flavipunctatus sp. nov., S. montanus sp. nov., S. pallidicinctus ).
Transitional forms exist that link the S. nitidus group to the closely related “euryglossiform” Scrapter and the relatives of S. aureiferus Cockerell, 1932 and S. calx Eardley, 1996 respectively (the latter form a species group of their own). But species of these two groups are generally distinctly smaller (usually <6 mm) with much finer punctation than in the S. nitidus group and males have a broader and shorter metasoma. Furthermore, “euryglossiform” Scrapter are the smallest bees of the genus and have an even narrower groove-like facial fovea with an invisible bottom but share with the S. nitidus group reduced apicolateral lobes of S7 and the general shape of male genitalia ( Kuhlmann 2014; Kuhlmann & Friehs 2020).
The Scrapter nitidus group can be divided into five subgroups ( Table 1 View Table 1 ) which differ in morphological characters and partly in distribution patterns. Since the phylogeny of the taxa of the Scrapter nitidus species group is unknown, species are listed alphabetically within the subgroups with the latter defined before the species are treated.
Cockerell T. D. A. 1915. XXX. - Descriptions and records of bees. - LXVI. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 8 (88): 341 - 350. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 00222931508693649
Cockerell T. D. A. 1916. LI. - Descriptions and records of bees. - LXXII. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 8 (17): 428 - 435. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 00222931608693809
Cockerell T. D. A. 1933. XXV. - Descriptions and records of bees. - CXLI. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 11 (62): 204 - 214. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 00222933308673646
Cockerell T. D. A. 1934. XXXIX. - Descriptions and records of bees. - CXLVIII. Journal of Natural History 13 (76): 444 - 456. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 0022293340865483
Cockerell T. D. A. 1936. XLVIII. - Descriptions and records of bees. - CLIV. Journal of Natural History 17 (10): 477 - 483. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 00222933608655145
Eardley C. D. 1996. The genus Scrapter Lepeletier & Serville (Hymenoptera: Colletidae). African Entomology 4 (1): 37 - 92. https: // journals. co. za / doi / epdf / 10.10520 / AJA 10213589 _ 181
Friese H. 1909. Die Bienen Afrikas nach dem Stande unserer heutigen Kenntnisse. In: Schultze L. (ed.) ZoologischeundAnthropologischeErgebnisseeinerForschungsreiseimwestlichenundzentralenSudafrika ausgefuhrt in den Jahren 1903 - 1905. Band 2. Denkschriften der Medizinisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft zu Jena 14: 83 - 476. https: // www. biodiversitylibrary. org / bibliography / 10343
Friese H. 1912. Neue und wenig bekannte Bienen Sud-Afrikas. Archiv fur Naturgeschichte, Abt. A 78 (5): 181 - 189. https: // www. zobodat. at / pdf / Archiv-Naturgeschichte _ 78 A _ 5 _ 0181 - 0189. pdf
Friese H. 1925. Die Urbienengattung Polyglossa Fr. in Sudafrika. Zoologische Jahrbucher, Abteilung fur Systematik, Geographie und Biologie der Tiere 49: 513 - 519.
Kuhlmann M. 2014. Revision of the '' euryglossiform' ' species of the Afrotropical bee genus Scrapter Lepeletier & Serville, 1828 (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Colletidae). European Journal of Taxonomy 95: 1 - 69. https: // doi. org / 10.5852 / ejt. 2014.95
Kuhlmann M. & Friehs T. 2020. Nine new species and new records of euryglossiform Scrapter Lepeletier & Serville (Hymenoptera: Colletidae) from South Africa. European Journal of Taxonomy 647: 1 - 33. https: // doi. org / 10.5852 / ejt. 2020.647
Fig. 26. Scrapter glaberrimus (Friese, 1912), lectotype, ♂ (SAMC). A. Terga 1–2 (dorsal view). B. Genitalia (dorsal view). C. Sternum 7. D. Sternum 8.
Fig. 39. Scrapter obtusus sp. nov., paratype, ♀. A. Lateral view. B. Head (dorsal view). C. Scutum and scutellum (dorsal view). D. Metanotum and propodeum (dorsal view). E. Metasoma (dorsal view). F. Terga 1–2 (dorsal view).
Fig. 13. Scrapter convexoides sp. nov., paratype, ♂ (RCMK). A. Lateral view. B. Scutum and scutellum (dorsal view). C. Metanotum and propodeum (dorsal view). D. Metasoma (dorsal view).
Fig. 15. Scrapter convexus sp. nov., paratype, ♀ (RCMK). A. Lateral view. B. Head (dorsal view). C. Scutum and scutellum (dorsal view). D. Metanotum and propodeum (dorsal view). E. Metasoma (dorsal view). F. Terga 1–2 (dorsal view).
Fig. 5. Scrapter flavipes (Friese, 1925), ♀. A. Lateral view. B. Head (dorsal view). C. Scutum and scutellum (dorsal view). D. Metanotum and propodeum (dorsal view). E. Metasoma (dorsal view). F. Terga 1–2 (dorsal view).
Fig. 6. Scrapter flavipes (Friese, 1925), ♂. A. Lateral view. B. Scutum and scutellum (dorsal view). C. Metanotum and propodeum (dorsal view). D. Metasoma (dorsal view).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SuperFamily |
Apoidea |
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Scraptrinae |
Genus |