Genus
Crateromys Thomas, 1895
View in CoL
Crateromys
View in CoL
is represented by one living species on Luzon (
Cr. schadenbergi
View in CoL
) and two additional species in other parts of the oceanic Philippines:
Cr. heaneyi
View in CoL
from Panay Island, and (possibly) extinct
Cr. paulus
View in CoL
from Ilin Island (near Mindoro); as noted above, molecular data indicate that
Cr. australis
View in CoL
from Dinagat Island (near Mindanao) should not be placed as a member of this genus ( Rowsey et al. 2018), and we do not include it in our treatment that follows. The cranial traits and features of external appearance of
Crateromys
View in CoL
species were described by Musser and Gordon (1981), Musser et al. (1985), Gonzales and Kennedy (1996), and Heaney et al. (2016a).
Crateromys
View in CoL
possesses high crowns, chevronate lower molar lophs, and strongly arched upper molar cusps that are separated by deep clefts and ridges ( Figs. 4
View Fig
and 5
View Fig
). As detailed above, this contrasts with the medium crown height and less strongly arched cusps of
Carpomys
View in CoL
.
Crateromys
View in CoL
dentition is most similar to that of
Batomys
View in CoL
, but the members of these two genera on Luzon differ dentally in several respects. Both
Crateromys
View in CoL
and
Batomys
View in CoL
have hypsodont molars, but
Crateromys
View in CoL
has higher crowns than
Batomys
View in CoL
. Upper molars of
Crateromys
View in CoL
generally are more angular, whereas
Batomys
View in CoL
cusps are more rounded in occlusal outline. The angular shape of cusps in
Crateromys
View in CoL
in part is due to deep clefts that separate lingual and medial cusps of upper molars. In anterocone of M1, t1 and t2 are separated by a deep cleft, and this pattern is repeated for t4/t5 and t7/t 8 in all upper molars ( Fig. 2C
View Fig
). These deep indentations are absent or less developed in most upper molar lophs in
Batomys
View in CoL
, with the exception of the posterior lophs (t7 and t8) in M1 and M2. In the
Crateromys
View in CoL
M1 anterocone, t1 and t3 are typically oriented anteriorly, whereas these cusps are oriented posteriorly in
Batomys
View in CoL
, producing a concave occlusal outline. Asimilar pattern is observed in the anterior loph of M2, where t4 and t6 are oriented anteriorly in
Crateromys
View in CoL
and transversely in
Batomys
View in CoL
. The anterior and posterior lophs of M3 have a more complex occlusal outline in
Crateromys
View in CoL
, whereas these lophs have a simpler laminar outline in
Batomys
View in CoL
. In
Crateromys
View in CoL
, the anterior and posterior lophs of m3 are chevronate and a posterior cingulum is occasionally observed; in
Batomys
View in CoL
, the anterior loph is not arched and the posterior loph is laminar or oblong in outline. Our assignment of the following new species to
Crateromys
View in CoL
is based on its possessing this set of characters.