Chromis mamatapara, Shepherd & Pinheiro & Phelps & Easton & Pérez-Matus & Rocha, 2020

Shepherd, Bart, Pinheiro, Hudson T., Phelps, Tyler A. Y., Easton, Erin E., Pérez-Matus, Alejandro & Rocha, Luiz A., 2020, A New Species of Chromis (Teleostei: Pomacentridae) from Mesophotic Coral Ecosystems of Rapa Nui (Easter Island) and Salas y Gómez, Chile, Copeia 108 (2), pp. 326-332 : 327-331

Chromis mamatapara , new species urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:9A0A722B-391C-44C8-A534-16ACA5DFF4C6

GenBank identifier for holotype: MN708011

English Common Name: Michel’s Chromis

Spanish Common Name: Castañeta de Michel

Figures 1–3 , Table 1

Holotype.— ( Figs. 1 , 3 ) CAS 247107 (field code LAR2650 ), 114.6 mm SL, Rapa Nui ( Easter Island ), Chile, Hanga Piko , 2789 0 12 00 S, 109826 0 52 00 W, Hawaiian sling, depth of collection 90 m, Luiz Rocha , Tyler Phelps, Mauritius Bell, 11 March 2017.

Paratypes.— CAS 247108 (field code LAR2648 ), 105.3 mm SL ; USNM 447900 (field code LAR2649 ), 108.7 mm SL (both collected with holotype) .

Diagnosis.— The following combination of characters distinguishes Chromis mamatapara , new species, from all of its congeners: dorsal-fin rays XIV (versus XV in C. randalli , the only other congener in the area, and XII–XIII or XV in most other Indo-Pacific species), 13–14 (versus 10 in C. randalli ); anal-fin rays II,12 (versus II, 10–11 in C. randalli ); pectoral-fin rays 18–19 (versus 21–22 in C. randalli ); principal caudal-fin rays 8 þ 7; spiniform procurrent caudal-fin rays 2; tubed lateral-line scales 18 (versus 21–22 in C. randalli ); posterior, mid-lateral scales with pore or deep pit 8–9; vertebrae 11 þ 15; gill rakers 9– 10 þ 21–23; total gill rakers 30–32 (versus 33–37 in C. randalli ); body moderately deep, depth 1.8–2.0 in SL (versus 2.3–3.0 in C. randalli ); tail and caudal peduncle yellow; distal edge of caudal peduncle at junction of posterior dorsal fin with a large white spot, its diameter about width of orbit ( Fig. 1 ).

Description.— Dorsal-fin rays XIV,13 (XIV,13–14); anal-fin rays II,12; all soft dorsal- and anal-fin rays branched, the last to base, the last two soft rays associated with a single complex pterygiophore; sixth dorsal ray longest, 5.7 in SL (4.7–5.5); pectoral-fin rays 18 j 18 (18–19 j 18), the uppermost and lowermost unbranched (uppermost two and lowermost in paratypes); pectoral-fin ray 3.2 in SL (3.0–3.1), the third ray longest; pelvic-fin rays I,5; principal caudal-fin rays 8 þ 7, the uppermost and lowermost unbranched; upper and lower procurrent caudal-fin rays 4, the anteriormost 2 rays (dorsally and ventrally) spiniform; tubed lateral-line scales 18 (damaged on left side in holotype); posterior midlateral scales with a pore 8 (8–9); scales above lateral line to origin of dorsal fin 3; scales below lateral line to origin of anal fin 11 (10–11); circumpeduncular scales 15 (14); gill rakers 9 þ 23 ¼ 32 (9– 10 þ 21 ¼ 30–31); supraneural bones 3; vertebrae 11 precaudal þ 15 caudal ¼ 26.

Body moderately deep, depth 2.0 (1.8–2.0) in SL, and compressed, the width 2.7 in body depth; head length 3.4 (2.9–3.2) in SL; profile of head slightly convex above orbit, nape slightly convex; snout length 4.5 (3.3–3.6) in head length; orbit diameter 2.7 (3.1–3.2) in head length; interorbital width 2.7 (2.8–3.3) in head length; caudal-peduncle depth 2.1 (2.3) in head length; caudal-peduncle length 2.3 (2.2–2.3) in head length.

Mouth terminal, oblique, upper jaw angle about 358 to the horizontal axis of head and body; posterior edge of maxilla vertical at anterior edge of pupil, upper jaw length 3.5 (3.3– 3.9) in head length; teeth multi-serial, outer row of conical teeth in each jaw, largest anteriorly; narrow band of villiform teeth lingual to outer row, in five irregular rows anteriorly, narrowing to a single row on side of jaws; tongue triangular with rounded tip; gill rakers long and slender, longest on lower limb near angle almost the same length as gill filaments; anterior nostril with a short fleshy rim, more elevated on posterior edge and located at level of horizontal line through middle of pupil, slightly less than halfway between front of snout and anterior edge of orbit; posterior nostril smaller and slit-shaped, located just above and behind anterior nostril, close to edge of orbit ( Fig. 3 ). Opercle ending posteriorly in flat spine, the tip relatively acute and not obscured by large scale; preopercular margin smooth, posterior margin extending dorsally to almost level of upper edge of orbit; suborbital with free lower margin extending nearly to a vertical at posterior edge of orbit.

Scales finely ctenoid; lateral line ending beneath rear portion of spinous dorsal fin (12 th dorsal-fin spine); head scaled except lips; squamation of preorbital and suborbital regions shown in detail in Figure 3 ; scaly sheath at base of dorsal and anal fins, progressively thicker on soft portion; column of scales on each membrane of dorsal fin, narrowing distally, those on spinous portion of dorsal fin progressively longer, reaching about half the distance to spine tips on posterior membranes; single column of scales on anal-fin membrane, progressively smaller distally; small scales on caudal fin extending almost to posterior margin; small scales on basal one-fifth of pectoral fins; median scaly process extending posteriorly from between bases of pelvic fins, its length about half that of pelvic spine; axillary scale above base of pelvic spine about half the length of pelvic spine. Origin of dorsal fin over third lateral-line scale; pre-dorsal length 2.5 (2.4–2.5) in SL; spinous dorsal-fin base length 2.1 (1.9) in SL; soft dorsal-fin base length 6.5 (5.6–6.0) in SL; first dorsal spine 10.2 (11.5) in SL; second dorsal spine 8.2 (7.2– 7.8) in SL; third dorsal spine 6.2 (5.8–6.7) in SL; fourth dorsal spine 5.9 (5.4–6.0) in SL; fifth dorsal spine 5.8 (5.3–6.6) in SL; sixth dorsal spine 5.9 (5.4–6.1) in SL; last dorsal spine 7.6 (7.2–7.7) in SL; sixth dorsal ray longest, 5.7 (4.7–5.5) in SL; first anal spine 15.4 (15.1–16.2) in SL; second anal spine 5.2 (5.3) in SL; longest anal-fin ray variable, first in holotype, second and sixth in paratypes; caudal fin forked, without filamentous extensions, its length 3.1 (2.7–2.9) in SL, and concavity 6.2 (5.2–7.2) in SL; third pectoral-fin ray longest, 3.2 (3.0–3.1) in SL; pelvic spine 5.7 (5.1–5.5) in SL; first pelvic soft ray 3.7 (3.2–3.4) in SL.

Coloration of adults in life.— Recently dead adult specimens ( Fig. 1A ) body overall metallic pale blue to lavender; base of dorsal fin, upper third of body, and head above and behind orbit predominantly golden-brown; posterior margins of scales with yellow highlights, especially pronounced on head and dorsal two-thirds of body; upper jaw pale yellow; iris yellow, faint yellow bar through interorbital space, middle of orbit and across operculum; distal margin of dorsal fin, pectoral fins, caudal peduncle and caudal fin predominantly yellow; pelvic fins and anal fin predominantly golden-brown with pale yellow between fin rays, especially proximal to body; pectoral-fin base predominantly brown; anal-fin base predominantly metallic blue-lavender. Underwater photographs of live specimens ( Fig. 2 ): body overall greenish-yellow, less brown and more yellow dorsally, more blue ventrally; caudal peduncle and tail yellow; distal edge of caudal peduncle at junction of posterior dorsal fin with a large white spot, its diameter about width of orbit; pectoral fins yellow, pelvic fins blue; top of orbit and interorbital space yellow; beneath orbit, along cheek and throat blue. Scales on ventral half of body darkened centrally, forming a series of 5–7 faint stripes from behind pectoral fin to caudal-fin base. Occasionally, specimens in underwater photographs taken in situ show a second, less-pronounced, smaller, white spot on the body just below the midpoint of the dorsal fin ( Fig. 2B ).

Coloration of juveniles in life.— ( Fig. 2A ) Based on color video and photographs of living specimens visualized during Drop-Cam and ROV surveys, juveniles are similar to adults in coloration, but paler overall; body blue to lavender; caudal peduncle and caudal fin yellow; distal edge of caudal peduncle at junction of posterior dorsal fin with a large white spot, its diameter about width of orbit; median and paired fins with less yellow than in adults.

Coloration in alcohol.— ( Fig. 1B, 1D ) Head and body overall straw to light-brown in color, with dark brown pigments retained at base of dorsal fin, upper third of body, on head and at base of median and paired fins; dorsal fin, pelvic fins, and anal fin predominantly brown; posterior margin of caudal fin brown; pectoral fins hyaline distally, pale white proximally.

Habitat and distribution.— Chromis mamatapara is only known to occur at Rapa Nui (Easter Island), Isla Salas y Gómez, and the seamount Pukao (~ 85 km west of Rapa Nui). Due to the high degree of endemism (21.7%) among the shore fishes of Rapa Nui ( Delrieu-Trottin et al., 2019), it is likely that Chromis mamatapara is endemic to this region.

The collected fish were recorded at a depth of 90 m in a rocky patch reef surrounded by a large sandy area. Adults have also been observed with ROV surveys at Rapa Nui at 90– 230 m and Pukao at 150–190 m in rocky patch reefs surrounded by sandy areas, around rhodoliths and fields of whip coral ( Stichopathes ), along rock walls interspersed with sandy areas, and dead or mostly dead reefs of Leptoseris . Juveniles of the new species have been observed during ROV surveys in association with Stichopathes at Pukao at 165 m and Rapa Nui at and 150–157 m ( Easton et al., 2019; Fig. 2A ).

Comparisons.— As with many of its congeners, Chromis mamatapara is a wide-bodied planktivorous fish associated with rocky reef structures on MCEs. On the basis of coloration and meristic data, C. mamatapara appears to be closely related to several species of Chromis bearing 14 dorsal-fin spines, in particular, C. mirationis , C. okamurai , C. struhsakeri , and C. tingting . The new species also bears resemblance to C. meridiana , C. notata , and C. plansei in having a pronounced large white spot on the distal edge of the caudal peduncle. Because comparative sequences for several potentially related species of Chromis are unavailable, we cannot assess its phylogenetic relationship to all these species. Nonetheless, we compared the sequence data of a fragment of the COI gene of C. mamatapara to those of all other Chromis available in public and our laboratory’s databases. Chromis tingting (GenBank accession number MN166324) from Japan has the most similar COI sequence (3.5% uncorrected genetic divergence) among these samples (Supplemental Table 1; see Data Accessibility). A second sequence (KU944414) listed in GenBank as C. okamurai was a 100% match to the sequence of C. tingting , and seems to be a mislabeled specimen of C. tingting (Y. K. Tea, pers. comm.).

Most tropical Atlantic species of Chromis also possess 14 dorsal spines, but this dorsal-fin formula is less common in the wider Indo-Pacific region ( Yamakawa and Randall, 1989; Allen and Erdmann, 2009). Of the valid species of Chromis , about 20 of the Indo-Pacific species of Chromis possess 14 dorsal spines. Several of these species, including Chromis mamatapara , C. mirationis , C. okamurai , C. struhsakeri , and C. tingting , are antitropical or are found only in MCEs or other deep-water habitats, and share other characters, including two spiniform procurrent caudal-fin rays and an overall grayish-blue coloration with yellow and brown highlights. Tea et al. (2019) summarized this group, highlighting differences in adult coloration, supplementing an initial list provided in Lecchini and Williams (2004) with newly described species. Pyle et al. (2008) proposed a grouping of deep-water Chromis characterized by having 14 dorsal-fin spines and low numbers of pectoral-fin rays (18–19) and gill rakers (24–28), to which they assigned C. abyssus , C. circumaurea , C. degruyi , C. okamurai , and C. woodsi . However, the group of Indo-Pacific Chromis with 14 dorsal-fin spines is morphologically diverse and is thus likely polyphyletic ( Allen and Erdmann, 2009). As with Chromis mamatapara , several species with 14 dorsal-fin spines, including C. meridiana , C. notata , and C. planesi , exhibit a pronounced white spot on the body at the posterior base of the dorsal fin just anterior to the caudal peduncle.

Chromis mamatapara shares a wide suite of morphological characters (14 dorsal-fin spines; 13–14 dorsal-fin rays, 12 anal-fin rays; 18–19 pectoral-fin rays; 8 þ 7 principal caudal-fin rays; 18 tubed lateral-line scales; 11 þ 15 vertebrae; 30–32 total gill rakers) with C. meridiana , C. mirationis , and C. verater . Chromis mamatapara can be distinguished from C. meridiana by having a deeper body (depth 50.2–50.9% SL versus 41.8–47.8% SL), a longer snout (6.6–8.7% SL versus 3.6–6.2% SL), and a wider interorbital region (width 10.8– 11.0% SL versus 8.7–10.6% SL); from Chromis mirationis by having a smaller head (29.5–31.2% SL versus 32.8–35.4% SL), a smaller eye (orbit diameter 9.6–10.8% SL versus 11.4–14.2% SL), a shorter upper jaw (8.5–9.4% SL versus 10.0–12.0% SL), and by lacking a distinct brown stripe extending laterally along the entire length of the midline; from Chromis verater by having two (versus three) spiniform procurrent caudal-fin rays, a more pronounced caudal concavity (5.2–7.2 in SL versus 10–14 in SL), and by lacking three smaller white spots located posteriorly at the base of the dorsal, anal, and caudal fins of living specimens.

Etymology.— The specific epithet is a compound word meaning ‘‘yellow damselfish’’ (māmata para) in Rapanui, in reference to the overall body coloration in life. To be treated as a noun in apposition. The suggested English common name, Michel’s Chromis (Castañeta de Michel in Spanish), is in honor of the late Michel Garcia, who greatly assisted our field work in Rapa Nui, and unfortunately died in May 2018.

Remarks.— Mesophotic coral ecosystems, popularly known as the coral reef twilight zone, are deeper extensions of the more familiar shallow-water coral reef ecosystems ( Rocha et al., 2018; Pyle and Copus, 2019). Because they are outside the range of recreational SCUBA diving, submarines, remotely operated vehicles, baited remote underwater videos, or technical diving using specialized equipment (rebreathers and mixed gases) are needed to explore these deep-reef habitats, complicating and increasing the costs of field operations ( Pinheiro et al., 2016; Baldwin et al., 2018). Therefore, relatively little is known about MCEs, and more than 70% of all research at those depths has been published in the past seven years ( Pyle and Copus, 2019). As a result, new-species discoveries within MCEs have held a steady high pace over the past two decades (Pyle et al., 2019), and current ichthyological collections are yielding discovery rates as high as two new species per hour of exploration, with new species corresponding to up to 6% of the local biodiversity ( Pinheiro et al., 2019a).

Recent studies of MCEs have revealed a dynamic ecology that is prone to shifts in species composition and varied levels of natural disturbances ( Rocha et al., 2018; Shepherd et al., 2018b; Pinheiro et al., 2019b). The new species described here, along with two additional recently described species, adds to the high diversity and uniqueness of the fish fauna of Rapa Nui ( Shepherd et al., 2018a, 2019). As with many small-range endemics inhabiting these islands, speciation likely occurred following a founder event, supporting the hypothesis that the islands act as an important center of speciation and a cradle of coral reef biodiversity in the region ( Delrieu-Trottin et al., 2019). This important evolutionary laboratory should, therefore, be protected by meaningful fishery regulations and conservation management plans that include both shallow coastal reefs and MCEs.

Figures

FIG. 1. (A) Holotype of Chromis mamatapara, new species (CAS 247107), shortly after death. Photo by L. A. Rocha. (B) Preserved holotype, lateral view. Photo by J. Fong. (C) Radiograph of holotype (CAS 247107). Photo by J. Fong. (D) Preserved holotype, dorsal and ventral views. Photos by J. Fong.

FIG. 2. (A) Aggregation of juvenile Chromis mamatapara, new species, in a field of Stichopathes sp. whip corals at a depth of 165 m on Pukao. Photo by M. Gorny, Oceana. (B) Aggregation of adult Chromis mamatapara, new species, photographed at a depth of 175 m on Pukao. Photo by M. Gorny, Oceana. (C) Collection site of Chromis mamatapara, new species, Rapa Nui, Chile, at a depth of 90 m. Two specimens are visible in the foreground, exhibiting the diagnostic white spot at the posterior base of the soft dorsal fin. Associated fishes include Chaetodon litus, Chromis randalli, Pseudolabrus semifasciatus, the recently described Plectranthias ahiahiata, Luzonichthys kiomeamea, and an undescribed member of the Serranidae. Photo by L. A. Rocha.

FIG. 3. Details of the head of the holotype of C. mamatapara showing the preorbital/suborbital scale pattern, anterior nostril (AN), posterior nostril (PN), and posterior edge of the free margin of infraorbital (FM). Photo by J. Fong.