Strigamia fulva Sager, 1856
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.214898 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:56D84A4E-E8A7-4C78-8C58-F85BAA13B9DF |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5613212 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A2607E-8762-FF89-B398-FB16FBA9F8E7 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Strigamia fulva Sager, 1856 |
status |
|
Strigamia fulva Sager, 1856 View in CoL
Synonym: Linotaenia micropus Chamberlin, 1902 .
References for morphology: Wood 1862, 1865; Meinert 1886 (sub Scolioplanes bothriopus ); Chamberlin 1902 (sub Linotaenia micropus ); Crabill 1954b.
Taxonomic notes. Described originally as a species of Strigamia View in CoL , it was variously cited under Linotaenia , Scolioplanes View in CoL or Tomotaenia. Following Meinert (1886), some authors considered it identical to S. bothriopus , but Crabill (1954b) re-examined the type material and demonstrated that the two species are distinct.
Linotaenia micropus was described by Chamberlin (1902), but practically ignored by subsequent authors, and only registered as valid by Attems (1929). Chamberlin (1961) later recognized it as identical “part. max” with S. fulva View in CoL , and Mercurio (2010) listed it as a synonym of S. fulva View in CoL . However, published information on the morphology of S. micropus does not allow a decision as to whether the type specimens belong to S. fulva View in CoL or S. bothriopus , which have been confused in the past ( Crabill 1954b), therefore the current synonymy is registered here only provisionally.
Distribution: eastern part of North America, westwards possibly to Iowa. Published records from other parts of North America need confirmation because of possible confusion with S. bothriopus .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |