Caladomyia
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.214771 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C1AC0E2B-2C2D-4CB6-A238-D1FCE1F7CDA |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5681530 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A13300-5109-FFD3-FF31-F990FA705CC3 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Caladomyia |
status |
|
Key to adult males of Caladomyia View in CoL (emended after Reiff 2000 key)
1. Margins of anal point without flap-like enlargement ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 14 – 16 ) or margins weakly enlarged [ Sanseverino & Fittkau (2007), figs 6, 9, 10]............................................................................................ 2
- Margin of anal point with flap-like enlargement, appearing divided in three protrusions (e.g. Figs 1 View FIGURES 1 – 2 , 16 View FIGURES 14 – 16 , 17 View FIGURES 17 – 18 , 22 View FIGURES 19 – 26 ).......... 3
2. Anal point bars absent [ Sanseverino & Fittkau (2007), Fig. 6 View FIGURES 3 – 7 ]................................. C. tuberculata (Reiss) View in CoL
- Anal point bars present ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 14 – 16 )............................................................ C. angelae sp. n.
3. Anal tergite setae stout................................................................................. 4
- Anal tergite setae sligth or absent......................................................................... 5
4. Anal tergite setae flattened, with longitudinal ridges on median part [ Säwedal (1981), Fig. 15 View FIGURES 14 – 16 ]......... C. poppigi Säwedal View in CoL
- Anal tergite setae cylindrical, without ridges ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 14 – 16 )........................................... C. carolae sp. n.
5. Digitus extending beyond median margin of superior volsella................................................... 6
- Digitus not extending beyond median margin of superior volsella.............................................. 14
6. Digitus reaching only slightly beyond posteromedian corner of superior volsella................................... 7
- Digitus very long and reaching far beyond superior volsella.................................................... 9
7. Anal point bars very short (8 µm). Anal tergite setae absent [ Säwedal (1981), Fig. 18 View FIGURES 17 – 18 ]................ C. kraussi Säwedal View in CoL
- Anal point bars longer (≥ 20 µm). Anal tergite setae present.................................................. 8
8. Wing length about 1.2 mm; LR1 about 2.62–2.75 [ Trivinho-Strixino & Strixino (2000), Figs 1 View FIGURES 1 – 2 and 3 View FIGURES 3 – 7 ]........................................................................................ C. friederi Trivinho-Strixino & Strixino View in CoL
- Wing length 1.31–1.50 mm; LR1 3.61–3.89 [ Säwedal (1981), Fig. 12 View FIGURES 8 – 13 ]............................. C. ortoni Säwedal View in CoL
9. Anteromedian corner of superior volsella drawn out into marked point [ Säwedal (1981), Fig. 14 View FIGURES 14 – 16 ]...... C. adalberti Säwedal View in CoL
- Anteromedian corner of superior volsella not drawn out into marked point....................................... 10
10. Bars short (<13 µm) ( Fig. 53 View FIGURES 53 – 60 )............................................................. C. curumim sp. n.
- Bars longer (>13 µm)............................................................................... 11
11. Digitus very long and strongly curved sickle-shaped ( Fig. 67 View FIGURES 67 – 74 )...................................... C. kapilei sp. n.
- Digitus not in a form of curved sickle..................................................................... 12
12. Tip of digitus rounded or truncate. Thorax and legs yellowish-green............................................ 13
- Tip of digitus slightly pointed. Thorax and legs brown ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 17 – 18 ).................................. C. bruneola sp. n.
13. Fused part of anal tergite bands 41–44 µm long. Superior volsella quadrangular. Tip of digitus truncate ( Fig. 42 View FIGURES 42 – 43 )................................................................................................ C. carolensis sp. n.
- Fused part of anal tergite bands 5–21 µm long. Superior volsella ovoid. Tip of digitus blunt, rounded [ Reiff (2000), Fig. 5 View FIGURES 3 – 7 ]......................................................................................... C. orellanai Reiff View in CoL
14. Anal point bars short (≤ 12 µm)........................................................................ 15
- Anal point bars long (> 13 µm)......................................................................... 21
15. Anal tergite setae absent............................................................................... 16
- Anal tergite setae always present........................................................................ 17
16. Digitus very short or not clearly recognizeable. AR 0.40–0.43 [ Reiff (2000), Fig. 7 View FIGURES 3 – 7 ]..................... C. erikae Reiff View in CoL
- Digitus longer. AR 0.92 [ Reiff (2000), Fig. 8 View FIGURES 8 – 13 ]................................................... C. hoefleri Reiff View in CoL
17. Superior volsella subrectangular, posterior and median margins nearly straight. Anal tergite setae in asymmetrical lateral posi- tions on each side of anal point base [ Reiff (2000), fig. 6]............................................ C. reissi Reiff View in CoL
- Superior volsella ovoid to cordiform, with posterormedian corner projecting. Anal tergite setae only slightly in asymmetrical lateral positions on each side of anal point base............................................................. 18
18. Superior volsella cordiform, with posterior corner projecting [ Sanseverino & Fittkau (2007), Fig. 4 View FIGURES 3 – 7 ]....... C. alata (Paggi)
- Superior volsella not cordiform, elongated and transverse to median line......................................... 19
19. Anal point bars <10 µm. Ventromedian projection of anal point long............................................ 20
- Anal point bars> 10 µm. Ventromedian projection of anal point short [ Säwedal (1981), Fig. 16 View FIGURES 14 – 16 ]...... C. mulleri Säwedal View in CoL
20. Ventromedian projection of anal point as long as anal point length [ Säwedal (1981), Fig. 17 View FIGURES 17 – 18 ]........ C. castelnaui Säwedal View in CoL
- Ventromedian projection of anal point shorter than anal point length ( Fig. 75 View FIGURES 75 – 82 ).......................... C. yara sp. n.
21. Anal point bar ratio ≤ 1.0............................................................................. 22
- Anal point bar ratio>1.0.............................................................................. 25
22. Digitus short, not reaching half length of superior volsella.................................................... 23
- Digitus longer, reaching near the median margin of superior volsella........................................... 24
23. Anal point bars large with bases inserted on anal tergite far anterior of base of anal point. Digitus 9–12 µm ( Fig.1 View FIGURES 1 – 2 )............................................................................................ C. humboldti Säwedal View in CoL
- Not as in above combination [Sublette & Sasa (1994), Fig. 189]............................. C. pistra Sublette & Sasa View in CoL
24. Wing length> 1.25 mm. Digitus 16–18 µm. Gonostylus shorter than gonocoxite, hypopygium ratio ≤ 0.8 ( Fig. 61 View FIGURES 61 – 66 )................................................................................................ C. jaragua sp. n.
- Wing length ≤ 1.05 mm. Digitus 28–29 µm. Gonostylus nearly as long as gonocoxite, hypopygium ratio 0.94–1.10 [ Reiff (2000), Fig. 12 View FIGURES 8 – 13 ]........................................................................... C. fittkaui Reiff View in CoL
25. Superior volsella almost square, with distinct lobe blunt apically.............................................. 26
- Superior volsella ovoid or rectangular.................................................................... 27
26. Wing length 1.57 mm. Anal point bar ratio 2.5. Gonostylus longer than gonocoxite, hypopygium ratio 0.55 ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 27 – 31 )............................................................................................... C. canine sp. n.
- Wing length 1.00– 1.44 mm. Anal point bar ratio 1.3–1.5. Gonostylus nearly as long as gonocoxite, hypopygium ratio 0.81–0.92 ( Fig. 49 View FIGURES 49 – 52 )...................................................................... C. comunis sp. n.
27. Superior volsella ovoid. Bars not extending beyond anal point. Wing length <1.17 mm ............................ 28
- Superior volsella rectangular. Bars long, extending beyond anal point. Wing length ≥ 1.20 mm ....................... 29
28. Bars 19–21 µm long. Digitus 25–27 µm long, reaching median margin of superior volsella [ Reiff (2000), Fig. 14 View FIGURES 14 – 16 ]................................................................................................... C. hero Reiff View in CoL
- Bars 14–18 µm long. Digitus 10 µm long, reaching half length of superior volsella at most [ Säwedal (1981), Fig. 6 View FIGURES 3 – 7 ]............................................................................................... C. spixi Säwedal View in CoL
29. Anal point bar ratio> 2.6. Wing length ≤ 1.20 mm ( Fig. 32 View FIGURES 32 – 41 ).................................... C. capaopreto sp. n.
- Anal point bar ratio <1.5. Wing length> 1.40 mm [ Reiff (2000), Fig. 9 View FIGURES 8 – 13 ]........................ C. riotarumensis Reiff View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.