Micronecta (Micronecta) pingae, Tran, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2021.756.1407 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4A60FB62-20D7-4DC9-A4EA-BCE633730111 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5033092 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1B2C7138-D9CD-4B1C-B894-C256CCA5B05A |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:1B2C7138-D9CD-4B1C-B894-C256CCA5B05A |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Micronecta (Micronecta) pingae |
status |
sp. nov. |
Micronecta (Micronecta) pingae sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:1B2C7138-D9CD-4B1C-B894-C256CCA5B05A
Figs 13I–J View Fig , 19 View Fig
Diagnosis
Body length 2.1–2.6. Pronotum longer than median head length. With dark and pale colour forms ( Fig. 13I–J View Fig ).
Males: fore femur with two spines on proximal third ventrally, one large spine on middle third, one longer spine in distal third dorsally, one pair of spines distally, and one long seta dorsodistally; fore tibia with a pair of long spines on distal third ventrally; palar claw moderately widened distally, apex rounded ( Fig. 19A View Fig ). Median lobe of sternite VII with three or four long setae and a narrowly rounded apex ( Fig. 19C View Fig ). Free lobe short, strongly widened distally, posterior margin convex medianly and both corners broadly notched, with a row of uniformly short, dark coloured setae restricted to lateral notch ( Fig. 19D View Fig ). Left paramere: shaft relatively short and broad, with a pre-apical ridge running to lateral margin, forming a large triangular projection on lateral margin; lateral margin notched on proximal part; mesial margin sinuate distally; apex truncate; basal lobe tongue-shaped, directed towards paramere’s apex ( Fig. 19F View Fig ). Right paramere: shaft broad, abruptly constricted and bent at middle part, mesial margin of proximal part convex, apical part strongly wavy and lobate, apex narrowly rounded; pars stridens processus with ca 30 ridges ( Fig. 19E View Fig ).
Etymology
This species is dedicated to Dr Chen Ping-ping, for her significant contributions to the taxonomy and our knowledge of Micronectidae .
Material examined
Holotype
VIETNAM • ♂; Nghe An Prov., Ky Son, Nat’ road 7, Ta Ca commune, Loi stream; 16 Apr. 2013; A.D. Tran et al. leg.; TAD1301 ; ZVNU.
Paratypes
VIETNAM – Nghe An Prov. • 10 ♂♂, 14 ♀♀; same locality data as for holotype; ZVNU • 2 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀; same locality data as for holotype; NHMW • 5 ♂♂; Con Cuong, Lien Huong Village, Khe Thoi stream; 21 Dec. 2012; Q.H. Ngo leg.; NQH1209 ; ZVNU • 4 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀; Con Cuong, Tung Huong Village, Khe Thoi stream; 21 Dec. 2012; Q.H. Ngo leg.; NQH1210 ; ZRC • 1 ♀; Pu Mat N.P. , Khe Kem waterfall and stream , site #2, ca 300 m downstream from waterfall; A.D. Tran et al. leg.; 18 Apr. 2013; TAD1311 ; ZVNU . – Cao Bang Prov. • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; Bao Lac, Hung Dao commune, Nhi Ao River , near Nam Xui bridge; 20 Dec. 2013; A.D. Tran et al. leg.; TAD1380 ; ZVNU .
Description
COLOUR ( Fig. 13I–J View Fig ). With variations in colour of dorsum and pattern of hemelytra (a dark form and a pale form). Dark form (specimens from site TAD1380, Cao Bang Prov. and TAD1301, Nghe An Prov.) with dorsum generally light brown ( Fig. 13I View Fig ): frons and vertex brownish yellow to brown; eyes reddish brown. Pronotum pale yellowish brown. Hemelytron with minute red dots scattered especially on orangish band along anterior margin of clavus, and on boundary between corium and embolium. Corium with three brown marks in middle part, usually fused into one irregular-shaped mark. Right membrane with similar colour and texture to corium, more translucent apically. Left membrane translucent and brown. Venter of thorax and abdomen pale yellow to yellowish brown, and legs very light pale yellow or nearly whitish. Pale form (specimens at site TAD1301, Nghe An Prov.) ( Fig. 13J View Fig ): frons, vertex, and pronotum pale yellowish. Hemelytron with indistinct marks, more like scattered small orangish dots. Membrane with similar colour and texture to corium, more translucent apically. Venter of thorax and abdomen pale yellow, and legs very light pale yellow or nearly whitish.
Structural characteristics
MACROPTEROUS MALES. Body length 2.19–2.63 (holotype: 2.38), width 1.0–1.25 (holotype: 1.23). Head width 0.84–0.87 (holotype: 0.85). Pronotum 2.75 times as wide as long (0.99: 0.36). Pronotum wider than head. Synthlipsis about 1.6 times as wide as posterior width of an eye (0.41: 0.26). Lengths of leg segments: fore leg: femur 0.30, tibia 0.18, pala 0.20; middle leg: femur 0.77, tibia 0.34, tarsus 0.43, claw 0.25; hind leg: femur 0.49, tibia 0.41, tarsus I 0.41, tarsus II 0.22, claw 0.05. Prestrigilar flap on segment V with prolonged apex ( Fig. 19B View Fig ). Strigil present. Median lobe of sternite VII, free lobe, and parameres as in diagnosis.
MACROPTEROUS FEMALES. Body length 2.13–2.5, width 1.0–1.28. Head width 0.81–0.85. Pronotum 2.5 times as wide as long (0.90:0.36). Pronotum wider than head. Synthlipsis 1.6 times as wide as posterior width of an eye (0.40: 0.25). Lengths of leg segments: fore leg: femur 0.27, tibiotarsus 0.29; middle leg: femur 0.72, tibia 0.29, tarsus 0.38, claw 0.2; hind leg: femur 0.5, tibia 0.36, tarsus I 0.33, tarsus II 0.16, claw 0.05.
Distribution
Vietnam: Cao Bang, Nghe An.
Remarks
Three new species, M. undulata sp. nov., M. nieseri sp. nov., and M. pingae sp. nov., are apparently related to each other and to M. janssoni Nieser, Chen & Yang, 2005 from Yunnan ( China) by having the left paramere with transverse ridge(s) or grooves on its shaft, a strongly modified apical part of the right paramere, and by the outline of the palar claw.
Among these four species, M. undulata sp. nov. is most similar to M. janssoni in the general outline of the prestrigilar flap on segment V, the shape of the median lobe of sternite VII, the broad truncate apex of the left paramere, and the shape of the basal lobe of the left paramere. The characteristics which separate these two species include the structure of the free lobe, the ridges on the left paramere, and the shape of the apical part of the right paramere. In M. undulata sp. nov., the free lobe is wavy distally, and without long setae, while in M. janssoni , it is only slightly sinuate at the apical margin and with long setae on the lateral angle. The left paramere of M. undulata sp. nov. has two transverse ridges on its shaft, one near the base, and one near the apex, while that of M. janssoni has one transverse ridge near the base of shaft and three less distinct grooves on the distal third of the shaft. The apical part of the right paramere is also differently modified in these two species (compare Fig. 17E View Fig with Nieser et al. 2005: fig. 16).
In a parallel manner, M. nieseri sp. nov. is most similar to M. pingae sp. nov. in the general outline of the prestrigilar flap on segment V, the shape of the basal lobe of the left paramere, the notch on the lateral margin near the base of the left paramere shaft, and the sinuate mesial margin of the left paramere. They can easily be separated from each other by the following characteristics. In M. nieseri sp. nov., the median lobe of sternite VII has an angular apex; the free lobe has a broadly notched lateral corner; and the left paramere has two transverse ridges, one near the basal notch and one near to the tounge-like apex. In M. pingae sp. nov., the median lobe of sternite VII is narrowly rounded; the free lobe has both lateral and mesial corners broadly notched; and the left paramere has only one transverse ridge pre-apically which runs into a triangular projection and has a truncate apex. The apical part of the right paramere of M. nieseri sp. nov. and M. pingae sp. nov. are both strongly modified, but differently, with that of M. nieseri sp. nov. being more elongate, and that of M. pingae sp. nov., by contrast, being shorter and broader, with a more acuminate tip. Both M. nieseri sp. nov. and M. pingae sp. nov. have various colour forms, with both having a paler form in which the hemelytra generally are pale yellow and without distinct markings.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |