Chiton (Chiton) magnificus (Bullock, 1988)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa067 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039D87D8-FFDB-2930-ECDA-3689B050FA8A |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Chiton (Chiton) magnificus |
status |
|
CHITON (CHITON) MAGNIFICUS View in CoL DESHAYES, 1827
( FIGS 4E, F View Figure 4 , 14–18 View Figure 14 View Figure 15 View Figure 16 View Figure 17 View Figure 18 )
Chiton magnificus Deshayes, 1827: 454 View in CoL . Chiton latus: Frembly, 1827 View in CoL . Chiton magnificus: Pilsbry, 1893: 160 View in CoL , pl. 30, figs 23, 24. Chiton (Amaurochiton) magnificus magnificus: Bullock, 1988b: 163 View in CoL , figs 52–54, 57, 58, 64, 65, 68, 72, 73 and 76. Chiton magnificus: Schwabe et al., 2006: 9 View in CoL View Cited Treatment , figs 7, 8 and 15. Chiton bowenii: Schwabe et al., 2006 View in CoL : Sirenko, 2006: 84. Chiton (Chiton) magnificus View in CoL , Chiton (Chiton) bowenii: Kaas et al., 2006: 111 View in CoL , 120, fig. 36, 40, map 14 (bibliography and synonymy). Chiton bowenii: Schwabe, 2009: 404–405 View in CoL .
Type material: MNHN-IM-2000–6039 (syntypes) (not seen). https://science.mnhn.fr/institution/mnhn/ collection/im/item/2000-6039
Type locality: Chile .
Descriptive notes: Size: large, 160 mm long and 81 mm wide on average ( Table 2), although larger individuals have been reported (> 190 mm; Brito, 2017). Colour varies geographically: usually black with light blue dots in the northern part of its range ( Figs 4E View Figure 4 , 14A View Figure 14 , 15A–C View Figure 15 ), blue and blue with orange or red with black in Golfo de Ancud ( Figs 14B–D View Figure 14 , 16A–C View Figure 16 ) and reddish orange or black in Estrecho de Magallanes ( Figs 4F View Figure 4 , 17A–C View Figure 17 ). Body shape: elongate oval with low dorsal elevation. Slit formula: 14/1/12–14. Plates: slightly convex head plate with numerous weak radial ribs (about 40 longitudinal ribs per side), with lines on the lateral areas ( Fig. 4E View Figure 4 ). Articulamentum: apophyses trapezoidal, insertion plate pectinate ( Fig. 15A, B View Figure 15 ). Perinotum: black, moderately broad, dorsally covered with smooth rounded scales of two different sizes ( Fig. 18A, C View Figure 18 ), the largest located near the margin and the small scales near the valves. Radula: central tooth rounded. The major lateral is the biggest tooth rounded in shape ( Fig. 18B, D View Figure 18 ).
Distribution: Isla San Lorenzo (~ 12°S), Peru to Bahía Tictoc (~ 43°S), Chile ( Bullock, 1988a; Sirenko, 2006; Schwabe, 2009). In this study, we found this species from Huasco (~ 28°S) to Fuerte Bulnes (~ 53.6°S), Chile ( Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ).
Remarks: King (1832) described Chiton bowenii from Tierra del Fuego, and Bullock (1988a) provided the new combination as a subspecies C. magnificus bowenii . Schwabe et al. (2006) suggested sufficient morphological differences to separate C. magnificus and C. bowenii . Based on the long-standing doubt about whether C. bowenii represents a taxon at the species-level, and the molecular results indicated no separation based on COI, we consider C. bowenii to be a junior synonym of C. magnificus , representing one particular morphotype among many colour patterns in this variable species (see Discussion).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Chiton (Chiton) magnificus
Ibáñez, Christian M, Pardo-Gandarillas, M Cecilia, Méndez, Marco A, Sellanes, Javier, Sigwart, Julia D & Sirenko, Boris 2021 |
Chiton magnificus
Schwabe E 2009: 405 |
Schwabe E & Forsterra G & Haussermann V & Melzer RR & Schrodl M 2006: 9 |
Sirenko BI 2006: 84 |
Kaas P & Van Belle RA & Strack HL 2006: 111 |
Bullock RC 1988: 163 |
Pilsbry HA 1893: 160 |
Deshayes, GP 1827: 454 |