Myrmarachne evidens Roewer, 1965
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2024.952.2647 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:00BEAF45-3564-4079-BB79-504FF82966C6 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13784859 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039D879D-FFE6-FF84-3334-5F32FE33FCC5 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Myrmarachne evidens Roewer, 1965 |
status |
|
Myrmarachne evidens Roewer, 1965 View in CoL
Myrmarachne evidens Roewer, 1965: 53 View in CoL , fig. 52.
Myrmarachne mussungue Wanless, 1978a: 42 View in CoL , fig. 19d–e, g–j, syn. nov.
Myrmarachne evidens View in CoL – Wanless 1978a: 42, figs 20a, h–i, 21d, f, i, 22a, d.
Diagnosis
The species is similar to Myrmarachne hesperia ( Simon, 1887) from West Africa. The male can be distinguished by the tibial apophysis, which has a narrow flange (in lateral view), whereas the flange in M. hesperia is wide – compare Fig. 49C View Fig with Wesołowska & Edwards (2012: fig. 74); in addition, M. evidens lacks the ventral scutum on the abdomen, which is present in other species. The female may be recognized by comparatively longer copulatory ducts than M. hesperia (cf. Fig. 49E View Fig with fig. 76 in Wesołowska & Edwards 2012).
Material examined
UGANDA • 3 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; Entebbe ; bush; 1200 m a.s.l.; 26 Feb. 1938; A. Holm leg.; MEU • 3 ♂♂, 4 ♀♀; Entebbe, Botanical Gardens ; 2 Apr. 1995; D. Penney leg.; NHM • 1 ♂; same locality as for preceding; 15 Apr. 1995; NHM • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; same locality as for preceding; Jul. 1994; NHM • 1 ♂; same locality as for preceding; 2 Jul. 1988; A. Russell-Smith leg.; MRAC 236 View Materials 108 • 1 ♂; Jinja; 0°29′ N, 33°8′ E; Jan. 1996; FSCA GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; Jinja, Bujagali Falls ; Aug. 1994; NHM • 1 ♂; Kampala, Namulonge Research Station ; 0°34′ N, 34°50′ E; harvested maize field; 4 Oct 1997; A. Russell-Smith leg.; MRAC 236 View Materials 127 GoogleMaps • 2 ♂♂; Mpigi distr.; Jul. 2001; FSCA • 1 ♂; same locality as for preceding; Jan. 1996; FSCA .
Redescription
Male
General appearance as in Fig. 48A–B View Fig , body slender.
MEASUREMENTS. Cephalothorax length 1.9–2.5, width 1.1, height 1.0. Eye field length 1.0–1.1, anterior width 1.0, posterior width 1.1. Abdomen length 2.2–2.6, width 0.8–1.0.
CARAPACE. Elongate with constriction at the mid-point, dark brown to black, eye field pitted, white hairs between anterior eyes and in fissure, faint transparent hairs on thoracic part. Chelicerae very long, dark brown, fang with short apophysis, seven long and four short (at base) teeth on promargin distributed full length of chelicera, 6–10 tiny teeth on retromargin ( Figs 48C View Fig , 49A View Fig ). Sternum, labium and endites brown.
ABDOMEN. Elongated, dirty yellowish with two dark brown dorsal scuta ( Fig. 48A View Fig ). Long thin colourless hairs on abdomen. Spinnerets grey.
LEGS. Dark yellow with brown femora, metatarsus I dark.
PALPS. Brown. Palpal organ as in Figs 48D–E View Fig , 49B–C View Fig , tibial apophysis sinusoid, with narrow flange (in lateral view), bulb rounded, embolus thin, encircles the bulb twice.
Female
General appearance as in Fig. 48F–H View Fig . Similar to male, slightly paler.
MEASUREMENTS. Cephalothorax length 2.4–2.5, width 1.1, height 0.8–0.9. Eye field length 1.0–1.1, anterior and posterior width 1.1. Abdomen length 2.8–3.2, width 1.2–1.3.
CARAPACE. Brown, eyes with black rings. Chelicera with seven small teeth on both margins.
ABDOMEN. Without scuta, yellowish, grey anteriorly, with brown wide streak at two thirds of its length. Venter with broad median grey streak. Spinnerets grey.
LEGS. First and second pair yellow, only metatarsus I brown. Leg III and IV with dark brown femora and tibiae, other segments yellowish. Leg IV longest.
EPIGYNE. With two triangular depressions and pair of very small pockets placed far from posterior epigynal border ( Figs 48J View Fig , 49D View Fig ). Internal structure as in Figs 48K View Fig , 49E View Fig , inlet parts of copulatory ducts very weakly sclerotized, copulatory ducts long, form three loops.
Synonymisation
The two species of Myrmarachne were originally described from a single sex, viz. M. evidens ♂ and M. mussungue ♀. The studied samples contain both sexes together, which suggests that these species names should be synonymized.
Distribution
Previously known from Congo ( M. evidens ) and Angola ( M. mussungue ), this is the first record of the species in Uganda.
FSCA |
Florida State Collection of Arthropods, The Museum of Entomology |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Myrmarachne evidens Roewer, 1965
Wiśniewski, Konrad & Wesołowska, Wanda 2024 |
Myrmarachne mussungue
Wanless F. R. 1978: 42 |
Myrmarachne evidens
Wanless F. R. 1978: 42 |
Myrmarachne evidens
Roewer C. F. 1965: 53 |