Adipicola leticiae, Crespo, 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4318.2.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E7C748D7-B8Ce-4Cad-Bd6A-5C39Da37Cedb |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6038776 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E1F4E5A4-85C0-477E-A3D1-0F0C489C9C63 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:E1F4E5A4-85C0-477E-A3D1-0F0C489C9C63 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Adipicola leticiae |
status |
sp. nov. |
Adipicola leticiae new species
Figs 2A View FIGURE 2 ̄J, 3ĀK, 4ĀD
Type material. Holotype CNP-Inv 2 229 and twelve paratypes: CNP-Inv 2230, one articulated specimen, CNP-Inv 2231, one articulated specimen, CNP-Inv 2232, one articulated specimen and CNP-Inv 2233, nine articulated specimens, all attached to the skull of a sei whale Balaenoptera borealis .
Type locality. 46° 10´S; 61° 50´W, off San Jorge Gulf , Argentina, from a depth of 104 m ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). The collection date was July 21, 2010. GoogleMaps
Etymology. This species is dedicated to Leticia Mercante, the first author´s wife, for her invaluable support during many years.
Diagnosis. The new species is characterized by the combination of the following characters: adult shell of medium size, up to 20 mm in length, elongate, fragile, ventral margin straight, distance from umbos to anterior shell margin about 30% of shell length; larval shell with prodissoconch 1 of about 175 µm and prodissoconch 2 with a size between 425 to 580 µm in length.
Description. Shell, fragile, subequilateral, equivalve, subrectangular, with anterior end rounded, dorsalanterior margin anteriorly inclined, lunule not defined; dorsal-posterior margin straight, posterior end rounded, ventral margin straight; umbones prosogyrate, not in touch, placed at 30% of shell length measured from the anterior margin. Periostracum dark-reddish brown. Ligament extending along the dorsal-posterior margin for about 65% of posterior length. External surface smooth with irregular growth wrinkles, periostracal hair absent. Internally white, porcelaneous, pallial line complete, without sinus; hinge plate without teeth or crenulations below umbo or behind ligament; posterior adductor scar circular, anterior scar oval, slightly smaller; pedal retractors fused with the posterior byssal retractors just above the posterior scar; anterior retractor scars not observed; prodissoconch 1 about 175 µm, prodissoconch 2 size between 425 to 580 µm in length. No direct anatomical observations could be made on the dried remains.
Morphological comparisons. The conchological features are compared with other Bathymodiolinae species that were or still are placed in Adipicola . Among these, A. osseocola Dell, 1987 , has a more sharply pointed anterior shell margin and its ventral margin is softly arched rather than straight ( Figs 5A View FIGURE 5 ̄B).
Adipicola pelagica (Forbes in Woodward, 1854) has a slightly arched ventral margin and a less forward-placed umbo (see B/L ratio) than A. leticiae n. sp.; it also attains a larger size of up to 36 mm in the holotype ( Figs 5 View FIGURE 5 C̄F).
The taxonomic position of A. projecta ( Verco, 1908) is contentious. Originally described as Modiola Lamarck, 1801 , Lamprell & Healy (1998) included it in Idas, Dell (1987) placed it in Adipicola , and Huber (2010) suggested a new genus for this species. Type material was not found in the cabinets of SAMA. The original description and illustration by Verco (1908, p. 195, pl.13, figs. 12̄13) suggest an Adipicola species distinguishable from our new species by a less elongate shell. Although the ventral border is nearly straight and almost parallel with the dorsal margin, both the shell length and ligament groove are shorter than in A. leticiae n. sp.
“ Adipicola ” longissima Thiele & Jaeckel, 1931, is a regionally rather restricted species ( Pante et al. 2012) that is predominantly attached to Nypa fruticans View in CoL nuts, in localities where palm trees grow ( Philippines, Indonesia and Solomon Islands mainly). Genetically, it clusters with “ Adipicola ” simpsoni Marshall, 1900. Therefore, Thubaut et al. (2013b) proposed a new generic name, “Nypamodiolus” for the two species. Unfortunately, the introduction of the genus name does not fulfil the requirements of the ICZN code (especially Art. 13) and is unavailable, therefore.
The types of “ A. ” longissima are smaller than the present species and possess a pellucid shell with a sharper, anteriorly more elongated and overall arched shell outline ( Figs 5 View FIGURE 5 ĪJ). “ Adipicola ” simpsoni is characterized by a more elliptical, posteriorly expanded shell ( Figs 6A View FIGURE 6 ̄D) in contrast to the more subrectangular shape of our species. This is also reflected by different H/L and B/L ratios ( Table 2).
The holotype of Gigantidas crypta ( Dall, Bartsch & Rehder, 1938) , previously placed in Adipicola by Dell (1987), is only about 4 mm long and has a slightly elevated and much forward-placed umbo. The shell outline is oval with a smaller posterior than anterior end and a slightly concave ventral margin. Much larger specimens of up to 52.9 mm were reported from Japan ( Habe 1977; Habe in Koyama et al. 1981; Kurozumi 2000). According to genetic studies, the species must be placed in the genus Gigantidas Cosel & Marshall, 2003 , related to G. gladius Cosel & Marshall, 2003 and the “ Bathymodiolus ” childressi group ( Thubaut et al. 2013a).
Huber (2010) excluded Prashad’s Modiolus dubius from the genus Idas and placed it within Adipicola due to the absence of periostracal hairs and the non-glossy interior aspect. Our examination of the holotype and paratype (ZMA.MOLL.135265, ZMA.MOLL.135270) ( Figs 5 View FIGURE 5 ḠH) suggests otherwise. The holotype, from Rotti Island, Indonesia, shows a rhomboidal shell outline with conspicuous periostracal hairs over posterior portions of the shell. In addition, it shows a well-developed concentric sculpture and elongate ligament from the beak to virtually the end of the dorsal posterior margin. These morphological features are more characteristic of Idas .
Species Material Length (mm) Height (mm) B (mm) B/L H/L
Adipicola leticiae Holotype 20 7 5 23,9 33,7 Paratype 1 18 6 4 24,2 35,1 Paratype 2 17 6 4 25,2 36,0 Paratype 3 16 5 5 29,2 31,1 Paratype 4 16 6 5 29,0 35,8 Paratype 5 13 5 4 27,7 37,0 Paratype 6 9 4 2 22,8 39,3 Paratype 7 11 4 3 26,8 40,6 Paratype 8 10 4 3 24,0 38,9 Paratype 9 9 4 3 28,3 41,2 Paratype 10 9 3 2 27,1 38,5 Paratype 11 8 3 2 25,5 39,3 Paratype 12 9 4 2 21,1 42,5
A. osseocola * Holotype 24 9 6 24,6 37,3 Paratype 1 28 9 8 28,1 32,7 Paratype 2 24 9 6 26,4 36,2 Paratype 3 19 8 5 24,3 39,7
A. pelagica * Syntype 1 36 17 12 32,0 46,1 Syntype 2 32 14 10 31,0 44,9
“ A. ” simpsoni* Syntype 1 23 10 4 19,6 46,2 Syntype 2 21 10 3 15,0 45,9 Syntype 3 17 7 3 16,4 42,7 North Sea 20 9 4 21,4 44,4 Shetlands 19 8 4 19,4 42,5 Shetlands 18 8 4 19,7 43,8
T. pacifica * Holotype 27 11 6 22,6 42,6 Japan 150 m 26 12 8 32,4 45,3 Japan 150 m 15 7 4 25,0 48,0 Dell (1987) suggested that the types of A. iwaotakii ( Habe, 1958) could belong to larger specimens of A. crypta . However, the genetic analysis by Thubaut et al. (2013b) places this species within Gigantidas and close to the Bathymodiolus “childressi group”.
Terua arcuatilis Dell, 1995 , differs from A. leticiae n. sp. by having an arched rather than straight ventral margin, a longer ligament and a larger and more elongate shell ( Figs 6 View FIGURE 6 ĒF). Terua pacifica ( Dall, Bartsch & Rehder, 1938) ( Figs 6 View FIGURE 6 ḠH) differs from the new species by having an arched ventral margin and a less elongate shell. Its collection sites in the Pacific off Oahu, Hawaii and southern Japan ( Dell 1987; Habe 1977) also suggests that these are different species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Adipicola leticiae
Crespo, Enrique 2017 |
A. leticiae
Crespo 2017 |
A. leticiae
Crespo 2017 |
Adipicola leticiae
Crespo 2017 |
Adipicola leticiae
Crespo 2017 |
T. pacifica
Crespo 2017 |
A. leticiae
Crespo 2017 |
Gigantidas
Cosel & Marshall 2003 |
Terua arcuatilis
Dell 1995 |
Idas
, Dell 1987 |
Bathymodiolus
Kenk & Wilson 1985 |
A. iwaotakii (
Habe 1958 |
Terua pacifica (
Dall, Bartsch & Rehder 1938 |
Adipicola
Dautzenberg 1927 |
Adipicola
Dautzenberg 1927 |
Adipicola
Dautzenberg 1927 |
Adipicola
Dautzenberg 1927 |
Adipicola
Dautzenberg 1927 |
A. projecta (
Verco 1908 |
Adipicola pelagica
Forbes in Woodward 1854 |
Modiola
Lamarck 1801 |