Heligmothrips Mound, 1970
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5190.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:26F27376-45AB-4F13-ADCB-705CB3EB6E77 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7140230 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039C190E-FF8E-FFB5-FF7B-FAF4FA5EA8A5 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Heligmothrips Mound |
status |
|
Heligmothrips Mound View in CoL
Heligmothrips Mound, 1970: 453 View in CoL .
Types species Trichothrips erinaceus Karny View in CoL
This genus of dark brown, usually macropterous species of Phlaeothripinae , is a member of the Liothrips lineage, and is presumably derived from the complex of taxa associated with the genus Teuchothrips . Members of the latter genus do not usually have the maxillary stylets elongate and crossing over in the head, although two species with this condition are known from New Caledonia, both of which are associated with leaf distortion on species of Hibbertia [ Dilleniaceae ] ( Mound & Goldarazena 2022). Moreover, some specimens here identified as H. brevidens from Kangaroo Island, also H. narrabri sp.n. and H. xanthoskelus sp.n., have the stylets parallel in the middle of the head ( Figs 51–59 View FIGURES 51–59 ). Study of species in this genus is technically difficult, because in order to study the convoluted maxillary stylets specimens must be partially bleached without disrupting the position of these stylets. In some species there is considerable variation in body size among individuals taken from the same locality and tree. Differences between specimens in colour of antennae, pronotal setae and fore wings are particularly difficult to assess. Moreover, the precise orientation of the maxillary stylets within the head is possibly not as consistent between species as indicated in Mound (1970), and the names H. erinaceus and H. gracilior (couplet 7 in key below) possibly involve a complex of species. Far more field work would be needed to establish if the observed differences are consistent, and if they are associated with different host plants, localities or seasons.
Diagnosis. Dark brown, usually macropterous Phlaeothripinae , body surface more or less reticulate. Head about as long as wide, maxillary stylets retracted to eyes and usually crossing over each other in middle of head, and each with a simple or complex loop or convolution posteromedially; mouth cone acute; postocular setae with expanded apices. Antennae 8-segmented; VII and VIII broadly joined; III with 1 sense cone, IV with 3 sense cones (2 in eiletus and narrabri ). Pronotum with 5 pairs of major setae; notopleural sutures complete. Prosternal basantra absent, ferna widely separated; mesopresternum varied, complete or with two triangles weakly joined or absent medially; sternopleural sutures long. Fore tarsus with a tooth in both sexes; fore femur enlarged in major individuals. Mesonotal lateral setae capitate, metanotal median setae usually acute. Fore wing broad and closely ciliate; duplicated cilia present (absent in narrabri ); 3 sub-basal setae present. Tergites II–VII each with 2 pairs of wing-retaining setae; tergite IX setae S1 and S2 long and capitate. Male sternite VIII with large pore plate.
Key to Heligmothrips species
1. Maxillary stylets closely parallel medially or crossing over each other, only one simple flexure posterolaterally ( Figs 51, 58 View FIGURES 51–59 ) 2
-. Maxillary stylets crossing over each other medially (rarely parallel), with one or more complex loops or coils posterolaterally ( Figs 52–56 View FIGURES 51–59 )......................................................................................... 5
2. Head elongate, at least 1.5 times as long as wide ( Fig. 57 View FIGURES 51–59 ); pronotum about as long as wide and not extending fully across prothorax ( Fig. 68 View FIGURES 60–68 )......................................................................... macropus View in CoL sp.n.
-. Head broad, about 1.0 times as long as wide ( Figs 51, 58 View FIGURES 51–59 ); pronotum transverse, in female about 2.0 times as wide as median length, in male about 1.7 times, extending fully across prothorax................................................ 3
3. Metanotal reticles large and weak, each with a spot medially ( Fig. 61 View FIGURES 60–68 ); antennal segments IV–V uniformly brown, each with 2 sense cones; fore wings without duplicated cilia, or micropterous..................................... narrabri View in CoL sp.n.
-. Metanotal reticles small and dense with no internal markings; antennal segments IV–V yellow on basal half, IV with 3 sense cones; macropterous, fore wings with duplicated cilia........................................................ 4
4. Mesopresternum divided into two lateral triangles or weakly connected medially; pronotal anteromarginal setae sometimes short but as broadly capitate as remaining 4 pairs of major setae ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 51–59 ); pronotal anteroangular setae of male no more than 1.5 times as long as those of female; fore wing with 12 or more duplicated cilia;............................ brevidens
-. Mesopresternum complete or narrowed medially; pronotal anteromarginal setae minute to short with weakly rounded apex; pronotal anteroangular setae of male at least three times as long as those of female; fore wing with no more than 6 duplicated cilia........................................................................................... frickeri View in CoL
5. Maxillary stylets arranged posterolaterally into pair of regular coils ( Fig. 54 View FIGURES 51–59 ); metanotal median setae stout, capitate and half as long as metanotum ( Fig. 60 View FIGURES 60–68 ); antennal segment IV with 2 sense cones; only micropterae known................... eiletus View in CoL
-. Maxillary stylets arranged posterolaterally into series of irregular loops, without regular and tight coils ( Figs 53, 56 View FIGURES 51–59 ); metanotal median setae slender and pointed, antennal segment IV with 3 sense cones; only macropterae known................... 6
6. Head longer than wide ( Fig. 56 View FIGURES 51–59 ), pronotum slender but slightly wider than long, narrower than prothorax width; body colour light brown with weak sculpture................................................................ exallus View in CoL sp.n.
-. Head and pronotum clearly wider than long; body dark brown with head and metanotum strongly reticulate............. 7
7. All femora and tibiae yellow or brownish yellow.............................................. xanthoskelus View in CoL sp.n.
- All femora dark brown, also mid and hind tibiae............................................................. 8
8 Pronotal major setae dark brown; maxillary stylets cross over each other in head at level of postocular setae, then often re-cross through a sharp angle at base of head, before producing two broad curves laterally ( Fig. 52 View FIGURES 51–59 )................... erinaceus View in CoL
-. Pronotal major setae pale; maxillary stylets cross over each other in head at the level of the postocular setae, then re-cross and produce a series of three large and complex hoops Fig. 53 View FIGURES 51–59 ).............................................. gracilior View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Heligmothrips Mound
Mound, Laurence A., Tree, Desley J. & Wells, Alice 2022 |
Heligmothrips
Mound, L. A. 1970: 453 |