Yara Reichardt and Hinton
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1649/072.064.0212 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3EF57686-9749-475A-91D7-1A87438C2C27 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039BCE70-972D-0F06-FCB5-FEB1AD43FC7A |
treatment provided by |
Diego |
scientific name |
Yara Reichardt and Hinton |
status |
|
Differential Diagnosis. Dorsum covered with dense, short setae ( Fig. 1 View Fig ). Antenna 8-segmented as in Hydroscapha ( Fig. 2 View Fig ; as opposed to 5 segments in Scaphydra ). Mentum and submentum not fused ( Fig. 4B View Fig ). Metacoxa with femoral plate short, reduced to area of articulation with metatrochanter ( Fig. 4A View Fig ). Metatrochanters with row of stiff, spine-like setae ( Fig. 4A View Fig ; absent in Hydroscapha and Scaphydra ). Abdomen with tergite IV ( Fig. 4B View Fig ) lacking a dense covering of setae (present in Hydroscapha and Scaphydra ). Aedeagus consisting of a forked base with a long, uncoiled median lobe ( Fig. 6).
have been used. In others, the term “last sternite” or “last ventrite” is used in place of the actual segment number. This can lead to substantial confusion as the males and females of the present species actually have a differing number of exposed abdominal segments, thus the “last sternite” is VIII in the females and XI in the male! We refer
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.