Seraphs peterjungi Caze, Merle, Pacaud
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4990.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:70610FEE-4497-4804-817C-CEC2D66DDBFE |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5088694 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039B8783-8754-FFFF-FF1E-F62112F0FED3 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Seraphs peterjungi Caze, Merle, Pacaud |
status |
|
Seraphs peterjungi Caze, Merle, Pacaud & Saint Martin, 2010
Figure 5D View FIGURE 5
2010 Seraphs peterjungi Caze et al. , p. 445, figs. 15J–N, 19.
Type material. Holotype — MNHN A28578 View Materials . The type measures 16 mm length, with a width of 3 mm ( Caze et al. 2010).
Type locality. Chaussy , France Lutetian .
Diagnosis. The shell is moderately ovate and elongated, with the widest part being just below the adapical end of the aperture. The apex is moderately blunt. The surface of the shell is smooth with faint sinuous growth lines. The labial callus is well-developed and conspicuous. The labrum is not thickened and has a moderately quadrate profile. The columella is recurved backward near the base. The base of the labrum does not extend as far as the end of the columella. The anterior of the body whorl has fine axial grooves.
Distribution. Lutetian— France Chaussy, Val d’Oise ( Caze et al. 2010); Grignon, Yvelines ( Caze et al. 2010); Beynes, Yvelines ( Caze et al. 2010); Saulx-Marchais, Yvelines ( Caze et al. 2010); Fercourt, Oise ( Caze et al. 2010); Parnes, Oise ( Jung 1974; Caze et al. 2010).
Remarks. This shell is only distinguishable from S. chilophorus by the residual colour under UV; for compara- tive remarks see that species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |