Platyphysus obtusus ( Chapuis, 1865 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1649/0010-065X-71.1.95 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:28C6C736-CDC7-4FD3-95FA-8B02B4AFC0AB |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039B4D18-5446-FFBF-55B0-E89EFDB963DA |
treatment provided by |
Diego |
scientific name |
Platyphysus obtusus ( Chapuis, 1865 ) |
status |
|
Platyphysus obtusus ( Chapuis, 1865) View in CoL
Platypus obtusus Chapuis 1865: 251 View in CoL .
Platyphysus obtusus (Chapuis) View in CoL : Wood 1993: 275.
Platypus frontalis Blandford 1896: 113 View in CoL . New synonymy.
Platyscapulus frontalis (Blandford) : Wood 1993: 274.
Costaroplatus frontalis (Blandford) View in CoL : Alonso- Zarazaga and Lyal 2009: 11.
Platypus turgifrons Schedl 1935: 358 View in CoL . New synonymy.
Platyscapus turgifrons (Schedl) : Wood 1993: 274.
Costaroplatus turgifrons (Schedl) View in CoL : Alonso- Zarazaga and Lyal 2009: 11.
Platypus particeps Schedl 1976: 91 View in CoL . New synonymy.
The type species of Platyphysus Wood, 1993 View in CoL is Platyphysus obtusus ( Chapuis, 1865) View in CoL . I have specimens of P. obtusus View in CoL that I compared with the two male Chapuis syntypes in IRSNB. Careful examination of dozens of specimens of this species and of C. frontalis View in CoL (holotype examined, NHMUK) has convinced me that the latter is the female of the former. All known specimens of P. obtusus View in CoL , in all collections, are male; all known specimens of C. frontalis View in CoL , in all collections, are female. While I have not collected males and females from the same galleries, during the course of my biodiversity research in Costa Rica I have seen many samples with both of these forms present and no other candidates for the opposite sex for either species. The two are similar in size, shape, and color and exhibit the same form of sexual dimorphism of the frons and the elytra as do other species of Platyphysus View in CoL and Costaroplatus Nunberg, 1963 View in CoL . The antennal scape is identical for the two forms, and the two share details of the metepisternum – metasternum impression (shape and the number and pattern of bordering small teeth). Both are collected from low elevation tropical forests of Mexico, Central America, and South America, at least as far south as Peru and Brazil. Further support for the association of P. obtusus View in CoL males with C. frontalis View in CoL females comes from the similar but smaller congener Platyphysus pouteriae (Wood) View in CoL , known only from the type series from Venezuela, which exhibits identical sexual dimorphism. The species C. frontalis View in CoL , then, must be transferred from Costaroplatus View in CoL to Platyphysus View in CoL , where it becomes a junior synonym of P. obtusus View in CoL .
While researching these two genera, I discovered two further synonymies, P. particeps and C. turgifrons (types of both in NHMW). Platypus particeps from Brazil was overlooked in Wood ’ s (1993) treatment of Platypodinae genera, so has not been formally assigned to a Neotropical genus. The P. particeps series is particularly informative. This series includes the holotype male, allotype female, three male paratypes, and one female paratype. Male P. particeps are indistinguishable from P. obtusus , and female P. particeps are identical with C. turgifrons and C. frontalis . Schedl (1976) described P. particeps towards the end of his life, which may explain why he overlooked the similarities with previously described species. The specimens of these species are in quite close proximity in Schedl ’ s collection: the P. particeps series is directly under two male specimens of P. obtusus and is in the same drawer (six rows over) as a series of seven female C. frontalis , the series of which, in turn, is three species above the female holotype of C. turgifrons .
Females of Platyphysus and Costaroplatus share a number of derived character traits. Males of Platyphysus and Costaroplatus are also very similar, differing primarily in details of the fifth ventrite, which is swollen in Platyphysus but has a pair of conical projections in Costaroplatus ( Wood 1993) . The two genera are doubtfully distinct, and this a matter of current investigation.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Platyphysus obtusus ( Chapuis, 1865 )
Kirkendall, Lawrence R. 2017 |
Platyphysus obtusus (Chapuis)
Wood, S. L. 1993: 275 |
Platyscapulus frontalis (Blandford)
Wood, S. L. 1993: 274 |
Platyscapus turgifrons (Schedl)
Wood, S. L. 1993: 274 |
Platypus particeps
Schedl, K. E. 1976: 91 |
Platypus turgifrons
Schedl, K. E. 1935: 358 |
Platypus frontalis
Blandford, W. F. H. 1896: 113 |
Platypus obtusus
Chapuis, F. 1865: 251 |