Creophilus variegatus, MANNERHEIM
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2011.00725.x |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FBFE9195-BE04-4AFE-9417-6E38BCE6AB84 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039B414F-1948-FFCC-FC85-FAE94FB1FA15 |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Creophilus variegatus |
status |
|
5. CREOPHILUS VARIEGATUS MANNERHEIM View in CoL
( FIGS 1J, 2C, D, 4A View Figure 4 , 23 View Figure 23 , 24 View Figure 24 )
Creophilus variegatus Mannerheim, 1830: 20 View in CoL . Type locality: ‘Brasilia ad Rio Janeiro’; Mannerheim, 1831: 434; Nordmann, 1837: 21; Laporte de Castelnau, 1840: 173; Gemminger & Harold, 1868: 575; Fauvel, 1875: 54; Lynch Arribalzaga, 1884: 129; Lüderwaldt, 1911: 417; 419; Bernhauer & Schubert, 1914: 399; Scheerpeltz, 1933: 1413; Herman, 2001b: 3325.
Staphylinus variegatus View in CoL ; Dejean, 1821: 21 (nomen nudum: Article 12.1); Erichson, 1839: 351; Blanchard, 1842: 76; Murray, 1870: 57. 77.
Emus variegatus ; Fauvel, 1877: xxvii.
Type material: Creophilus variegatus Mannerheim. Lectotype (here designated). ♀, ‘ ♀ / Silberm/ Brasilia/ [red] LECTOTYPE | Creophilus | variegatus| Mannh.| designated by| A. Newton 1978/ Mus. Zool. H: fors| Spec. typ. no. 15232| Creophilus | variegatus Mannh. / FMNH-INS 0000 016 813/ [red] LECTOTYPE | Creophilus | variegatus Mannerheim, 1830 | designated by| D. J. Clarke 2008’ (in MZHF). Newton’s lectotype designation has not been published (A. F. Newton, pers. comm.).
Other material examined: 333 specimens. See supporting information, Appendix S1.
Diagnosis: With characters of the maxillosus -group; antennae subincrassate; apex of antennomere 11 convex ( Fig. 23B View Figure 23 ); pronotum strongly constricted basally with sharply delimited hind angles ( Fig. 23H View Figure 23 ); elytral epipleura yellowish; with extensive pattern of white and golden brown vestiture on pronotum, elytra, and abdomen ( Fig. 1J); tergal chaetotaxic formula 6-6-6-4(6)-6-8.
Description: Measurements (N = 10♂, 10♀). Forebody length: ♂ 6.4–9.9 mm, ♀ 6.6–8.3 mm. See supporting Table S4 for comparison of ranges of male and female ratios. Head. Head slightly wider anteriorly in large males, subtrapezoidal (wider posteriorly) to suborbicular in females and smaller males; HW/HL = 1.25– 1.56; basal margins setose; dorsal punctation coarse, moderately dense; eyes large ( EYL /HL = 0.48–0.70), dorsolateral in large males, more lateral in females and smaller males, lateral margins of head visible in dorsal view only in large males, obscured by eye in smaller specimens, HL1/HL2 greater in females than males (♂ = 1.54–3.00, ♀ = 3.20–5.00); antennae characteristic ( Fig. 23B View Figure 23 ), subincrassate; antennomeres 1–3 brownish-black, 4–11 variably yellowish-brown and black; antennomeres 9 and 10 narrowed anteriorly, thickened posteriorly; apex of antennomere 11 convex medially; each pair of apical setae moderately widely separated, one on each side of apex; mandibles as in Figures 2C, D and 23A View Figure 23 , longer than head in large males, shorter in females ( ML /HL ♂ = 0.95– 1.48, ♀ = 0.89–0.96), T 3 larger than T 1 and T 2. Thorax and abdomen. Pronotum ( Fig. 23H View Figure 23 ) slightly transverse ( PW / PL = 1.07–1.22), with sides subparallel to slightly convex anteriorly, distinctly constricted posteriorly, and hind angles sharply delimited; PL 1.23–1.50 ¥ ESL; vestiture of anterolateral declivities and sides sparse, whitish-grey and brown; vestiture of basal margin golden-brown, dense, and 2¥ as long as setae on anterior angles, with central setae radiating outwards; basolateral impressions broad and deeply set, with dense golden-brown setae; vestiture of scutellum whitish-grey anteriorly, brown posteriorly; disc of elytra brown-black, epipleura yellowish; vestiture of elytral surface dense, with patches of whitishgrey, brown, and golden setae forming complex pattern, posterior-most setae forming loose golden apical band ( Figs 1J, 23G View Figure 23 shows white setae only); apical setae 2¥ length of discal setae; hind wings fully developed, clear yellowish-brown, without black spot in medial field between MP 3 and MP 4 veins; pterothorax and legs covered with whitish and golden vestiture; dorsal abdominal vestiture arranged into characteristic pattern of whitish-grey, golden, and brown maculation ( Fig. 1J); vestiture on all sternites mostly whitish, with irregular black patches laterally; abdominal tergite VII with well-developed palisade fringe. Male genitalia and secondary sexual characters. Sternite VII distinctly emarginate medioapically ( Fig. 23K View Figure 23 ). Aedeagus as in Figure 23F View Figure 23 ; median lobe apex long, pointed ( Fig. 23M View Figure 23 ); paired apicolateral sclerites (as) fused to sides of median lobe. Paramere as in Figure 23C View Figure 23 ; with apex entire; and with setae along entire length. Internal sac inverted as in Figure 23F View Figure 23 , everted as in Figure 23E View Figure 23 , paired basoventral spiculose regions absent; with additional sclerotized bar ( Fig. 23J View Figure 23 ) connecting ventral sclerite (vs) with base of copulatory piece (cp); copulatory piece sclerites mostly fused along midline, without membranous sheath ( Fig. 4A View Figure 4 ). Female internal genitalia. Apex of tergite X narrowly rounded ( Fig. 23L View Figure 23 ). Internal female genitalia as in Figure 23I View Figure 23 ; vaginal plate (vp) rounded posteriorly, without median sclerotized strip. Chaetotaxy. Basiantennal and basisternal macrosetae absent; elytral discal series with 4–6 macrosetae; mesocoxae with one macroseta at distal margin; tergal chaetotaxic formula 6-6-6–4(6)-6-8, inner laterals present or absent on tergite VI.
Comparison: Creophilus variegatus is easily distinguished from other species of the C. maxillosus -group by the body vestiture patterning ( Fig. 1J), antennae ( Fig. 23B View Figure 23 ), and sharply delimited basal pronotal angles ( Fig. 23H View Figure 23 ). Males are unusual within the genus in having the apex of sternite VII distinctly emarginate medially ( Fig. 23K View Figure 23 ) and the parameral apex entire ( Fig. 23C View Figure 23 ).
Distribution ( Fig. 24 View Figure 24 , triangles): Endemic to South America: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile (one record), Paraguay, Peru (one record), Uruguay.
Biology and ecology: Lüderwaldt (1911) records the species from carrion, and Lynch Arribalzaga (1884) additionally reports predation of calliphorid maggots. Habitat: unknown. Altitude: sea-level to 3000 m. Phenology: throughout the year. Other biology and life-history characteristics are unknown. Larvae and pupae are unknown.
Remarks: Dejean (1821) listed Staphylinus variegatus Dej. , attributing the name to himself, but did not provide a description. Mannerheim (1830) published the name Creophilus variegatus Dej. , attributing the name to Dejean, but also provided the first description so authorship is attributed to him. Mannerheim (1830) did not indicate the number of specimens examined.
ML |
Musee de Lectoure |
T |
Tavera, Department of Geology and Geophysics |
PW |
Paleontological Collections |
PL |
Západoceské muzeum v Plzni |
MP |
Mohonk Preserve, Inc. |
VI |
Mykotektet, National Veterinary Institute |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Creophilus variegatus
Clarke, Dave J. 2011 |
Creophilus variegatus
Herman LH 2001: 3325 |
Scheerpeltz O 1933: 1413 |
Bernhauer M & Schubert K 1914: 399 |
Luderwaldt H 1911: 417 |
Lynch Arribalzaga F 1884: 129 |
Fauvel A 1875: 54 |
Gemminger M & Harold E 1868: 575 |
Laporte de Castelnau FL 1840: 173 |
Nordmann A 1837: 21 |
Mannerheim CG 1831: 434 |
Mannerheim CG 1830: 20 |
Staphylinus variegatus
Murray A 1870: 57 |
Blanchard E 1842: 76 |
Erichson WF 1839: 351 |
Dejean PFMA 1821: 21 |