Sonerila versicolor Wight (1846
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.375.2.3 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13728854 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0399C966-BC69-FFB1-42F4-F9A1FA81F787 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Sonerila versicolor Wight (1846 |
status |
|
Sonerila versicolor Wight (1846 View in CoL part 4: 3, t. 1057)
Lectotype (designated here or perhaps holotype):— INDIA. Kerala: Palakkad district, Nilgiri hills, Sisparah , s.d., Wight s.n. (barcode K000867672 [image!]) Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 .
Nomenclatural notes:— Wight (1846) described S. versicolor based on the collection from Western slopes of the Nilgiris, below Sisparah among grass and low jungle. While searching for relevant specimens, we traced two sheets at K (barcodes K000867672!, K000867673!) and one at CAL (Accession no. 173066!) bearing the ‘Herb. Wight’ labels. The sheet K000867673 has an annotation “Neilgherry hill, February 1850 ” and the drawings of dissected floral parts by Gamble. It also bears an annotation by the late Roger Lundin (Swedish Museum of Natural History) as “ S. versicolor Wight , Lectotypus ”, but not properly published. In fact Wight described S. versicolor in 1846 and this sheet postdate the publication of S. versicolor and hence cannot be chosen as the lectotype. The Wight Icone No. 1057 is written on sheet K000867672 while the sheet at CAL is without any details of collection and is an admixture of S. gamblei (1985: 235) and S. versicolor . Hence it can be presumed that Wight’s circumscription was based on the lone specimen at K, which is designated here as the lectotype, but perhaps could be considered the holotype.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.