Procas biguttatus Faust, 1882
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.1234.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8D608A41-09CD-4626-935E-26BF20AB7587 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039787D5-FFA8-FFD1-1526-FEA8BC63F882 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Procas biguttatus Faust |
status |
|
Procas biguttatus Faust, 1882: 275 ; Bedel 1884: 113; Desbrochers 1894: 84; Winkler 1932: 1540; Klima 1934: 30; Inoue et al. 1963: 378, pl. 189, fig. 28; Egorov 1977: 33, 1981: 66; Hayashi et al. 1984: 289; Kwon & Lee 1986: 75 [= okunii Kôno ]; Somokuroku 1989: 505; Zherikhin & Egorov 1990: 25 ( Fig. 39 View FIGURES 39–43 ), 28, 29, 31; Anon. 1994: 205 [not seen]; Caldara & O’Brien 1995: 396; Egorov et al. 1996: 437; Hong et al. 2000: 17; Kojima & Morimoto 2004: 77.
Notaris okunii Kôno, 1930: 159 ; Klima 1934: 36; Kôno & Kim 1937: 29 [not seen].
Description
Length 4.9–6.5 mm, mean (24) = 5.46. Head usually with more or less distinct frontal pit or irregular smooth area (often with both); rostrum more slender in male: × 4.5–5.1 as long as broad, mean (6) = 4.78, than in female: × 4.2–4.8 as long as broad, mean (8) = 4.49; punctures on upper surface fairly regular, interspaces sometimes uniting to form irregular carinulae but often without any trace of a median carina or apical carinula; sides above scrobes usually widening somewhat abruptly but sometimes evenly, as in P. armillatus .
Antennae with lengths of funicle segments 1–3 in ratio 10: (6.0–7.1): (3.3–4.8), mean (15) = 10: 6.6: 4.1; segment 2 × 1.5–1.9 as long as 3, mean (15) = 1.6; segment 1 × 2.1–3.0 as long as 3, mean (15) = 2.46; segment 7 weakly transverse, × 0.8–0.9 as long as broad, mean (12) = 0.87.
Prothorax with pronotal punctures fairly regular, interspaces forming a regular reticulum on disc; smooth median line vestigial.
Legs with fore tibiae straight or weakly sinuous, middle tibiae straight, hind tibiae evenly curving dorsad (as in P. picipes ).
Vestiture rather coarse, white setae forming a variegated pattern on elytra and condensed at top of declivity to form white flecks in interstriae (2), 3 and (4) which together can form a short interrupted transverse band ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 1–8 ); tibiae as in P. p. picipes .
Terminalia. Male sternite 8 with very slender column and slender curved bladelike processes ( Figs 92–95 View FIGURES 86–99 ); female sternite 8 with pigmented areas more or less fused, setae small (<0.03 mm)( Figs 39, 40 View FIGURES 39–43 ); spermatheca with glandlobe conical at base, weakly expanded at apex and not, or only weakly, deflexed ( Figs 65–67 View FIGURES 65–73 ).
Type material
LECTOTYPE of Procas biguttatus Faust , here designated, female, with small square of goldsurfaced paper (now oxidised to brown); ‘Wladiwast./ Christoph.’ (Faust MS); ‘Coll. J. Faust / Ankauf 1900’ (printed, on yellow card); ‘Type’ (printed on red card); ‘biguttatus’ (MS, on yellow card) and ‘ LECTOTYPE Procas biguttatus Faust det. R.T. Thompson 2003 ’ in SMT. The specimen is carded and in good condition (two tarsi are incomplete); it has white spots on both interstriae 2 and 3, so fits the description better than the other syntypes. PARALECTOTYPES: 3 females with same labels as lectotype; one is mounted below the lectotype, on the same pin, the other two have no original determination label. Faust states that he had four specimens but adds ‘und vom Amur.’
HOLOTYPE of Notaris okunii Kôno , male, with ‘Sapporo / T. Okuni’ (printed) and ‘late August [in Japanese]/ 1912’ ( MS, under label); ‘ Notaris / okunii / Kôno’ ( MS) and ‘Type’ (printed) on pale crimson label; ‘ Procas / biguttatus / Faust’ ( MS) and ‘det. H. Kôno’ (printed) on white label in HUM. The specimen is 6.3 mm in length and lacks the right hind leg which was apparently pushed off by the pin, which has also displaced the venter. The tibiae, femora and parts of the elytra are dark redbrown in colour, indicating that the specimen is somewhat teneral. The eighth tergite is exposed and shows that the specimen is male, not female, as stated by Kôno.
Other material examined
RUSSIA: 1 ex. Amur [18]77 (Christoph)( DEI) ; 1 ex., with ‘ Amur / 4997’ (on yellow card), ‘7224’ (red ink) and ‘fasciatus / Faust’ (on yellow paper with ‘?’ added later in pencil ( SMT) ; 4 ex. Amur (Radde)( NMB) ; 1 ex., with ‘ Saghalien [= Sakhalin] / K. Tamanuki’ (printed), 28.vi.1927 ( MS, under label) and ‘ Notaris okunii Kôno’ ( ZIP) ; 2 ex., with ‘ Chabarowka [= Khabarovsk] am Amur’ ( SMT) ; 1 ex. with ‘ NikolskUssurijsk , fl. B. Elduga’ (locality not found), 11.vi.1930 (T. Samoilov)( BMNH) ; 3 ex. Ussuysk , 10 and 12.vi.1930 (T. Samoilov)(2 KU, 1 MAF) ; 1 ex. Ussuri District, Bikin River, Island , 10.vii.1927 (Martynov) ; 2 ex. Suchan District, Tigrovaya River , 9.vi.1927 (Sokolov) ; 1 ex. ditto, but 8.vi.1927 (Shtakelberg) ; 1 ex. Suchan Town , vii.1925 (A. Chernysh. [?]) ; 1 ex. Primorye District, ‘ Iman. ’ [?], 22.iv.1911 (Shingarev) ; 4 ex. Evseevka , 10, 28, 29.v and 1.vi.1910 (Shingarev) ; 1 ex. ditto, but 14.v.1911 and (Ikonnikov)(all ZIP) ; 1 ex. South Primorye, Kamenushka , 19.vi.1979 (Mikheechev and Nikitsky)( BMNH) ; 1 ex. ditto, except 4.vi.1984 and (Nikitsky)( ZMUM) ; 2 ex. with ‘ OstSiberien / Vladivostok, Kangauz Village , 22.vi.1927 (A. Porvi [?])( SMT) ; 2 ex. With ‘E[aster]n/ Siberia’, F.P. Pascoe Coll. ( BMNH) . JAPAN: 1 ex. Honshu, Schizuoka Prefecture, Mount Amagisan , 14.vi.1953 (K. Kusama) ; 1 ex. Gifu Prefecture, Kamitakaramura , 16.vii.1967 (T. Nohira) ; 1 ex. Hokkaido, Mount Nipesotsu, Mamishihoro , 19.vii.1976 (H. Irie)(all KU) . KOREA: 1 ex. Gyeongbug Province, Mount Pelgongsan , 6.vi.1978 (Y.J. Kwon)( KNU) . CHINA: 1 ex. with ‘ Manshukuo, Erzendjanzsy’ [? = Erdaodianzi], 30.vi.1940 (W. Alin)( DEI) . Total : 40 specimens.
Other (published) localities
RUSSIA: Kuril Islands, Kunashir ( Egorov et al. 1996: 437). KOREA, NORTH: (No details) ( Kwon & Lee 1986: 75).
Comments
All the specimens examined have at least one white spot at the top of the elytral declivity but none has a ‘white scutellum.’ The specimen figured by Caldara & O’Brien 1995 (‘ Procas sp. ’) appears to be P. armillatus .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Procas biguttatus Faust
Thompson, Richard T. 2006 |
Notaris okunii Kôno, 1930: 159
Kono, H. & Kim, H. K. 1937: 29 |
Klima, A. 1934: 36 |
Kono, H. 1930: 159 |
Procas biguttatus
Kojima, H. & Morimoto, K. 2004: 77 |
Hong, K. J. & Egorov, A. B. & Korotyaev, B. A. 2000: 17 |
Egorov, A. B. & Zherikhin, V. V. & Korotyaev, B. A. 1996: 437 |
Caldara, R. & O'Brien, C. W. 1995: 396 |
Zherikhin, V. V. & Egorov, A. B. 1990: 25 |
Somokuroku, N. K. 1989: 505 |
Kwon, Y. J. & Lee, S. M. 1986: 75 |
Hayashi, M. & Morimoto, K. & Kimoto, S. 1984: 289 |
Egorov, A. B. 1981: 66 |
Egorov, A. B. 1977: 33 |
Inoue, H. 1963: 378 |
Klima, A. 1934: 30 |
Desbrochers des Loges, J. 1894: 84 |
Bedel, L. 1884: 113 |
Faust, J. 1882: 275 |