Agrisius japonicus dubatolovi Orhant, 2012, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4459.1.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:951081F8-5CEE-4E78-AFC5-0925284EF9EC |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5960965 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039787C3-FF82-C776-FF59-FE438917FB7B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Agrisius japonicus dubatolovi Orhant, 2012 |
status |
stat. nov. |
Agrisius japonicus dubatolovi Orhant, 2012 , stat. nov.
( Figs 5, 6 View FIGURES 1–10 , 23, 24 View FIGURES 21–26 )
Agrisius dubatolovi Orhant, 2012 , Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de Mulhouse 68 (3): 37, Figs 4–6 View FIGURES 1–10 (Type lOcality: Thailand, " Kanchanaburi, SOng TOh Mine , 831 M. ").
Material examined: 1 ♂, Vietnam, Cao Bang, Mt. Pia Oac , 1700 m, III.2002, slide AV1690 ♂ (Coll. SZMN) ; 1 ♂, China, Guangxi, Jiuwandashan , VI.2003, Wang Min leg., prep. Dubatolov (Coll. SZMN) ; 1 ♂, Hainan Isl., China, Diaoluashang, near Resort hotel, alt. 750/ 900 m, 24.V.2004, LT, K. Ueda leg., prep. Dubatolov (Сoll. SZMN).
Remark. This taxon was described by Orhant (2012) as a valid species without comparison with its closest relative A. japonicu s Leech, 1889, and later Dubatolov & Kishida (2013) have suggested that dubatolovi might be a subspecies of japonicus . The detailed comparison of its male genitalia ( Figs 23, 24 View FIGURES 21–26 ) demonstrated its conspecificity with A. japonicus ( Figs 21, 22 View FIGURES 21–26 ). Nevertheless, dubatolovi has several morphological differences from A. japonicu s japonicu s therefore, here we treat it as a valid subspecies of A. japonicus .
Diagnosis. Agrisius japonicus dubatolovi ( Figs 5, 6 View FIGURES 1–10 ) is externally very similar to A. japonicu s japonicu s ( Figs 1, 2 View FIGURES 1–10 ) by grey wing coloration, but differs by the slightly larger size and the somewhat narrower forewing. Both those subspecies are geographically separated by A. j. albida Daniel, 1952 , which has whitish wing coloration. The male genitalia of A. japonicus dubatolovi ( Figs 23, 24 View FIGURES 21–26 ) differ from those of two other subspecies ( Figs 21, 22 View FIGURES 21–26 ) by the uncus shape, which has the longer dorsal processes of its distal branches (thus, the distance between the apex of the dorsal process and the lobe-like rounded crest is the shortest, compared with other subspecies of A. japonicus ), and also by the smaller vinculum and the somewhat longer distal saccular process.
Distribution. South Сhina (Guangdong, Hainan), Indochina ( Vietnam, Thailand).
SZMN |
Siberian Zoological Museum |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Agrisius japonicus dubatolovi Orhant, 2012
Volynkin, Anton V., Dubatolov, Vladimir V. & Kishida, Yasunori 2018 |
Agrisius dubatolovi
Orhant 2012 |