Eustala mourei Mello-Leitão, 1947
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3872.5.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CFBDD55F-B15D-46E6-8C0F-50ECCB6374DA |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6136490 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03974B09-FFEB-FFC1-FF00-2329FBF8FCFA |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Eustala mourei Mello-Leitão, 1947 |
status |
|
Eustala mourei Mello-Leitão, 1947 View in CoL
Figs 75–84 View FIGURES 75 – 84 , 87 View FIGURE 85 – 87
Eustala mourei Mello-Leitão 1947: 241 View in CoL , figures 9–10, two males and two females syntypes from Bariguí, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil, deposited in Museu Paranaense (currently Museu de História Natural Capão da Imbuia, MHNCI 2507, 2508, 2509, 2510). Brignoli 1983: 270; examined by H.W. Levi in 1988 ( Levi 2007, figures); Pinto-da-Rocha & Caron 1989: 1025, designated a male lectotype, MHNCI 2508 and the specimens 2507, 2509 and 2510, as paralectotypes; Platnick 2014.
Note. Only the male lectotype ( MHNCI 2508 ) and a non-type male specimen ( MHNCI 2108 ), from the same locality, were found at MHNCI. The paralectotypes ( MHNCI 2507 , 2509 , and 2510 ) are apparently lost. The female paralectotype was not found, however in this work we tentatively redescribe the female using a specimen that fits with the illustration made by H.W. Levi in 1988 ( Levi 2007, figures).
Additional material examined. BRAZIL, Paraná: Curitiba ( Barigui ), 25°15’S, 49°14’W, ♂, X.1944, R. Lange ( MHNCI 2108 ). GoogleMaps Santa Catarina: Rancho Queimado, 27°28’S, 48º54’W, 2 ♂, 09.–13.X.1995, A.A. Lise et al. ( MCTP 6975 , 7049 ); GoogleMaps ♂, 15.–19.XI.1995, A.B. Bonaldo ( MCN 26779 ); GoogleMaps Rio Uruguai , 27º08’S, 53º03’W, ♂, 02.IX.2010, R.C. Francisco ( MCTP 37231 ). GoogleMaps Rio Grande do Sul: São Borja ( Reserva Biológica de São Donato ), 28°38’S, 56°00’W, ♀, 21.I.2012, M. Machado ( MCTP 34836 ); GoogleMaps ♀, 10.–25.V.2012 ( MCTP 36204 ); ♂, ♀, 14.III.2013, M. Machado ( MCTP 37039 ); São Francisco de Paula, 29°14’S, 50°31’W, ♂, 24.X.1996, R. Ott ( MCTP 10589 ); GoogleMaps ( Usina Hidrelétrica Passo do Inferno ) ♂, 26.IX.2000, E.H. Buckup ( MCN 33365 ); ( Potreiro Velho ) ♂, 19.–22.III.1998, A.A. Lise ( MCTP 15685 ); 2♂, 26.–28.X.2012, M.R.M. Poeta ( MCTP 35512 ); Cambará do Sul, 29°02’S, 50°08’W, ♂, 25.XI.1993, A.B. Bonaldo ( MCN 24327 ); GoogleMaps Canela, 29°21’S, 50°48’W, ♂, 07.X.1964, A.A. Lise ( MCN 45737 ); GoogleMaps Triunfo ( Estação Ambiental Braskem ), 29°56’S, 51°43’W, ♂, 07.XII.2005, A. Barcelos ( MCN 40076 ). GoogleMaps
Diagnosis. The male palp of Eustala mourei ( Figs 75, 76 View FIGURES 75 – 84 ) resembles those of E. photographica and E. farroupilha n. sp. ( Figs 56, 57 View FIGURES 56 – 64 ) by the laminar terminal apophysis and by the subterminal apophysis with a transparent projection (see Poeta et al. 2010a: 158, figures 30, 31). The palp of E. mourei differs from these species by the elongated and a thin projection of the subterminal apophysis that reaches the conductor (ventral view, Fig. 76 View FIGURES 75 – 84 ), and by the lack of the conspicuous tegular projection of E. photographica . Eustala mourei and E. farroupilha n. sp. are very similar, but they can be distinguished by the apical portion of the embolus, which is longer in E. farroupilha n. sp. (equal or longer than the basis of the embolus). The epigynum of E. mourei ( Figs 78–83 View FIGURES 75 – 84 ) resembles those of E. photographica (see Levi 2007, figures 32–34) by the short-annulated scape and the wide median plate (posterior view, Fig. 80 View FIGURES 75 – 84 ), but differs from this species by the copulatory opening position that is very close in E. photographica .
Description. Male (Lectotype, MHNCI 2508 ) : Carapace pale yellow; narrow ocular area, median and lateral eyes with black border, and many white setae near the lateral eyes. Sternum pale yellow with white pigment and large gray border. Abdomen subtriangular, dorsum white crackled with well-defined greenish folium ( Fig. 77 View FIGURES 75 – 84 ). Venter pale yellow with a well-defined dark gray lines from the epigastric furrow to the spinnerets and an elongated central white patch. Legs pale yellow with light brown bands. Total length 6.4. Carapace length 3.1, width 2.8. Leg formula 1243. Length leg I: femur 4.0; patella+tibia 4.2; metatarsus 2.6; tarsus 1.2; total 12.0. Patella+tibia II 3.7; III 1.7; IV 2.9.
Female ( MCTP 37039 ) : Carapace yellowish-white; median and lateral eyes with black border. Sternum pale yellow with dark gray border and many dark brown setae. Abdomen subtriangular, dorsum yellowish-white, crackled, faint light brown folium; light brown marks in the anterior and lateral area; anterior longitudinal light brown mark ( Fig. 84 View FIGURES 75 – 84 ). Venter white crackeled, with well-defined black band from the epigastric furrow to the spinnerets with an elongated white central patch. Legs pale yellow with brown bands. Total length 5.8. Carapace length 2.1, width 1.9. Leg formula 1243. Length leg I: femur 2.7; patella+tibia 3.0; metatarsus 1.6; tarsus 0.7; total 8.0. Patella+tibia II 3.2; III 1.3; IV 1.8.
Variation. Male (n=5): total 4.1–6.4; carapace length 2.1–3.1, width 1.9–2.9. Abdomen with terminal hump; dorsum white with light brown folium; yellow with longitudinal brown line; greenish-gray with folium; without folium; folium area completely dark gray. Venter of the abdomen as female.
Distribution. Brazil: Paraná, Santa Catarina, and Rio Grande do Sul ( Fig. 87 View FIGURE 85 – 87 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.