Campoplex xizangensis, Han & Achterberg & Chen, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6B3D85E9-31FE-4D08-8E15-BA8959DD1988 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5653987 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B1-470C-6C5B-9DD1-1ED50AC079F8 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Campoplex xizangensis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Campoplex xizangensis sp. nov.
Figs. 81–82 View FIGURE 81 View FIGURE 82
Material examined. Holotype: female, Xizang, Yangzhuoyongchuo , 15.VII.2015, 3048m, N29.79°, E93.91°, 15.VII.2015, Liu Zhen, No201409026 ( ZJUH). GoogleMaps
Description. Female ( Fig. 81 View FIGURE 81 ) holotype. Body length 9.0 mm, fore wing length 6.2 mm.
Head. Antenna with at least 30 flagellomeres (apical segments missing); first flagellomere 1.3× longer than second flagellomere. Face ( Fig. 82E View FIGURE 82 ) rugose-punctate. Clypeus ( Fig. 82E View FIGURE 82 ) rugose-punctate, slightly convex, apical margin arched, blunt. Malar space nearly smooth, 0.5× basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons rugose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance ( Fig. 82F View FIGURE 82 ) 1.3× ocello-ocular distance and 1.7× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base.
Mesosoma. Pronotum rugulose-punctate dorsally, mat, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum ( Fig. 82G View FIGURE 82 ) granulosepunctate, becoming rugose in notaulic region. Scutellum granulose-punctate anteriorly, rugose posteriorly. Metanotum rugose. Mesopleuron ( Fig. 82B View FIGURE 82 ) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny, rugose above mesopleural fovea. Metapleuron ( Fig. 82B View FIGURE 82 ) rugose-punctate. Propodeum ( Fig. 82C View FIGURE 82 ) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia rugulose, subpolished; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, with a moderately groove medially; all carinae developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval.
Wing. Fore wing ( Fig. 82A View FIGURE 82 ) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (60°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.1.
Legs. Hind femur 5.0× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.55× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate.
Metasoma. First metasomal segment ( Fig. 82H View FIGURE 82 ) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove present. First tergite 2.8× longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.75× as long as first tergite, 1.3× longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite 2.0× its length. Third tergite 1.4× longer than its width. Metasoma from third tergite on strongly compressed. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 2.2× longer than hind femur, ovipositor ( Fig. 82D View FIGURE 82 ) gradually upcurved.
Colour. Black. Mandible medially yellowish brown; scape and pedicel blackish brown; tegula yellowish brown; fore leg entirely yellowish brown except coxa brown; mid leg yellowish brown except coxa and telotarsus brown; hind coxa black, trochanter, trochantellus, tibia basally and apically and tarsus blackish-brown, femur and tibia medially reddish brown; metasoma entirely black.
Distribution. China (Xizang).
Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1977) to C. homonae Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977 , but differs from the latter by having face and clypeus rugose-punctate, pronotum rugulosepunctate dorsally, prepectal carina without a notch-like constriction, areolet relatively large and higher than stalk, and mandible yellowish brown medially.
Etymology. Name derived from the name of type locality of species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |