Ctenotillini Brothers et Lelej, 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.25221/fee.480.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F798770D-B8E3-4EDF-93AB-F9666E087A28 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10945390 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0396364D-FFC1-794F-FE5A-E21A897BFBFA |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Ctenotillini Brothers et Lelej, 2017 |
status |
|
Tribe Ctenotillini Brothers et Lelej, 2017
DIAGNOSIS. MALE. At least T4–6 with medial longitudinal carina (except noncarinated T 4–6 in Lehritilla ), prementum tuberculate, mandible apically bidentate, without subapical inner tooth, S7 medially or laterally tuberculate (except unarmed in Ctenotilla caeca ), gonostylus apically straight or slightly down curved (strongly in Williamstilla gen. n.), parapenial lobes dorsally elongate with deep emargination separating them. FEMALE. The sculpture of the pygidial plate is presently the most reliable character to separate females of tribes Ctenotillini , Zeugomutillini and Pristomutillini (granulose or microreticulate in Ctenotillini , although striate in Lehritilla and some Cephalotilla ( Nonveiller, 1979) ; glabrous or weakly longitudinally striate in Zeugomutillini , coarsely longitudinally striate in Pristomutilla (with at least one species having it transversely striate-rugose ( Nonveiller, 1995). Scutellar scale lacking.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.