Eulimandia ovisimilis Martin & Belk, 1989

Rogers, D. Christopher, 2020, Spinicaudata Catalogus (Crustacea: Branchiopoda)., Zoological Studies 59 (45), pp. 1-44 : 9-10

Eulimandia ovisimilis Martin & Belk, 1989

= Eulimnadia ovismilis ( Belk, 1989) in error in Durga Prasad & Simhachalam, 2004

Comments: Paraguay and Argentina. Brendonck et al. (1990) demonstrates great overlap in the egg morphology among New World taxa with cylindrical eggs. The egg for E. ovisimilis is presented in the original description and Marinone et al. (2016). Marinone et al. (2016) demonstrate that this species may very well be a junior synonym of E. chacoensis .

Eulimnadia pampa Marinone, Urcola & Rabet, 2016

= Limnadia brasiliensis ( Sars, 1902) in César, 1990

Comments: Argentina.

Eulimnadia pinocchionis Timms, 2016a

Comments: Known only from the type locality a single gnamma (rock pool) in the Pilbara coastal plain of Western Australia.

Eulimnadia rogersi Rabet & Gallerne , in Rabet et al., 2015

Comments: Known only from the type locality in

Adrar, Mauritania.

Eulimnadia taroomaensis Timms, 2016a = Eulimnadia sp. M Schwentner et al., 2015 (fide Timms 2016)

C o m m e n t s: Ta r o o m D i s t r i c t, Q u e e n s l a n d,

Australia.

Eulimnadia texana Packard, 1871 = Limnadia texana ( Packard, 1871)

Comments: Widespread in the Americas and associated islands ( Brendonck et al. 1990; Pereira and García 2001; Rogers et al. 2020). Brendonck et al. (1990) demonstrates great overlap in the egg morphology among New World taxa with cylindrical eggs. The egg is depicted in Belk (1989) and Pereira and García (2001).

Eulimnadia ulurensis Timms, 2016a

Comments: This species is a gnamma (rock pool) specialist, known only from Uluru and Kata Tjuta rocks, Northern Territory, Australia.

Nomina dubia, nuda, and species inquirendae:

Eulimnadia africana ( Brauer, 1877) nomen nudum fide Rabet et al. 2015

= Limnadia africana Brauer, 1877

Comments: Type locality given as “ Khartoum ”, in the Sudan. The eggs are unknown. Barnard’s (1929) material is probably a misidentification ( Rabet et al. 2015).