Scutisotoma ladaki ( Denis, 1936 ) Potapov & Babenko & Fjellberg, 2006
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.1382.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DA24BC85-1740-4465-8342-AD1D10878CD2 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587D4-FF97-FFE9-1373-F95A71B2FDD5 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Scutisotoma ladaki ( Denis, 1936 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Scutisotoma ladaki ( Denis, 1936) View in CoL , comb.n.
Figs. 40–47 View FIGURES 40–44 View FIGURES 45–47
Proisotoma ladaki Denis, 1936: 262
Material studied. Numerous specimens, Russia, Siberia, Taimyr Peninsula, northern
shore of Pjasina Lake [70 o 05’N 87 o 27’E], stony beach, leg. A. Babenko. 25 exx., Russia, Siberia, Tuva Republic, Alashskoye Plateau, shore of Kara-Khol Lake , near water edge, leg. S. Stebaeva; 1 ex., Mongolia, Ar-Khangayski Aimak, Tuvshrulekh, leg. A. Druk; 2 exx., from another unknown locality in Mongolia ( MSPU) GoogleMaps .
Redescription. Size 1.20–1.35 mm. Usually pale green, dark specimens can be almost violet. Extremities paler. Cuticle with visible primary granulation, unmodified on Abd.V. 8+8 ocelli, G and H smaller. PAO elliptical, not constricted and almost twice as long as the ocellus or 0.6–0.8 as long as inner unguis. Maxillary outer lobe with 4 sublobal hairs, maxillary palp bifurcate. Labral formula 4/554. Labium with a full set of papillae and guards, 3 proximal and usually 5 basomedian chaetae. Ventral side of a head usually with 5+5 postlabial chaetae. Ant.1 with 2 basal microsensilla (bms), dorsal and ventral, and 2 ventral sensilla (s). Ant.2 with 3 bms and one laterodistal s. Ant.3 with one bms and 5 distal s (4 in AO and 1 lateral). In most mature males additional sex sensilla (antennal “spurs”) absent, only some specimens have few in the middle part of Ant.3. Sensilla on Ant.4 hardly differentiated, subapical organite minute.
Tergal sensilla well differentiated, shorter than ordinary chaetae. Sensillar formula 33/ 22224 (s), 11/111 (ms) ( Fig. 46 View FIGURES 45–47 ). The most lateral sensillum on Th.II is on the same level as other lateral sensilla. Medial sensillum on Abd.III in midtergal position. Abd.V sensilla situated in a line ( Fig. 45 View FIGURES 45–47 ). Macrochaetae poorly differentiated, those on Abd.V 0.2–0.3 as long as tergite. Axial chaetom of Th.II–Abd.III as 9–10,7–8/5,5–7,7–8. Th.III with 30–35 chaetae in p-row. Thorax without ventral chaetae.
Unguis without inner tooth, slightly elongate ( Fig. 43 View FIGURES 40–44 ). Tibiotarsi 1–3 with more than 21-21-25 chaetae. B-row complete, T-chaetae absent. Tibiotarsal tenent chaetae (1-2-2) clearly clavate, shorter than unguis (U 3: t.ch. = 1,0–1,5: 1). Chaetae x and B 5 on Ti. 3 in males short and chaeta-like ( Fig. 43 View FIGURES 40–44 ). Ventral tube with 4–5 laterodistal and 6 posterior chaetae ( Fig. 47 View FIGURES 45–47 ). Tenaculum with 3+3 teeth and one chaeta ( Fig. 44 View FIGURES 40–44 ). Sometimes an additional reduced tooth present on one of the rami. Anterior furcal subcoxa with 27–33 chaetae, posterior one with 12–14 chaetae. Anterior side of manubrium with a pair of distal chaetae, posterior side with more than 30+30 chaetae. Laterobasal lobes with 4–5 chaetae. Dens with 28–39 anterior chaetae, basal 1/5 without chaetae. Posterior side of dens tuberculated with 9–12 chaetae in basal group, 7–10(12) outer, 7–9 inner, and one subapical chaeta near mucro ( Fig. 40–42 View FIGURES 40–44 ). Mucro strong and lamellate, with 3 subequal teeth. Ratio of manubrium: dens: mucro = 5,5–7,4: 5,6–6,8: 1. Chaetotaxy of anal lobes as in S. karadagi sp.n.
Taxonomic remarks. The above redescription is in full agreement with Denis’ (1936) original description. We only add some additional characters not mentioned by Denis. The association with fresh water habitats probably explains the wide distribution of the species, from high mountains of northern India to tundra landscapes of northern Siberia. Dunger’s (1982) Ballistura sp. from Mongolia is probably the same species.
S. ladaki is the most similar to S. muriphila . Apart from absence of sexual dimorphism in mature males, S. ladaki differs from S. muriphila in having 5 basomedian chaetae on labium and differing position of sensilla on Abd.V (cf. Fig. 45 View FIGURES 45–47 and Fig. 39 View FIGURES 36–39 ). Moreover, the dens of S. ladaki is cylindrical while more tapering in muriphila , and its dorsal side usually tuberculated (crenulated in muriphila ).
Denis’ original type material from northern India is probably lost (Prof. J.-M. Thibaud, pers. comm.) .
Distribution. Widely distributed in Asia. A neustonic form inhabiting microsites near fresh cold water.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Scutisotoma ladaki ( Denis, 1936 )
Potapov, Mikhail, Babenko, Anatoly & Fjellberg, Arne 2006 |
Proisotoma ladaki
Denis, J. R. 1936: 262 |