Loneura maracaensis García Aldrete, 2004
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4576.1.11 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:368063BF-ECBF-48E2-9355-134CF5340153 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5933399 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587A4-FFA4-1F54-FF69-3845FE68B2A2 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Loneura maracaensis García Aldrete |
status |
|
Loneura maracaensis García Aldrete
( Figs 10–22 View FIGURES 10–17 View FIGURES 18–22 )
Loneura maracaensis García Aldrete 2004: 306 , Figs 6–10 View FIGURES 1–9 View FIGURES 10–17 ; García Aldrete & Mockford, 2009: 668 (species list); Garcia Aldrete, González & Sarria, 2011: 61 (infrageneric classification); Silva-Neto & García Aldrete, 2016 (catalog); Mendivil Nieto, Garcia Aldrete & González, 2017: 497 (Key of species).
Diagnosis. As described by García Aldrete in 2004
Male. As described by García Aldrete in 2004
Female. Color. Compound eyes black, ocelli hyaline, with ochre centripetal crescents; head pattern ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 10–17 ). Scape brown and pedicel brown, f1–f3 pale brown. Mx4 pale brown, with apex white. Femora brown; tibiae pale brown with distal ends brown; tarsomeres 1–3 pale brown. Forewings ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 10–17 ); almost hyaline, pterostigma with small pale brown bands basally and distally; a brown spot at confluence of CuP-1 A, veins brown. Hindwing hyaline; veins brown ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 10–17 ).
Morphology. Compound eyes without interommatidial setae ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 10–17 ). Outer cusp of lacinial tip broad, with five denticles ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 10–17 ). Forewing pterostigma elongate, wider in the middle, narrowing at the ends; areola postica tall, with round apex; Rs straight, R 2+3 almost straight, R 4+5 sinuous; M stem slightly concave proximally, then almost straight, with six primary branches, M 6 forked, resulting in M 6a and M 6b ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 10–17 ). Hindwing Rs and R 2+3 straight, R 4+5 slightly recurved; M vein with four primary branches ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 10–17 ). Subgenital plate broad, with sides converging to a pointed apex, pigmented area wide, V shaped, setae as illustrated ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 10–17 ). Ninth sternum ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 10–17 ) broad, almost square, basally with a strongly pigmented area, arch shaped, on each antero-lateral corners; distally with a strongly pigmented area sinuous, on each postero-lateral region, with a membranous convex apex in the middle. Gonapophyses: v1 long, with outer margin heavily sclerotized, wider in the middle and narrowing at the ends, with acuminate apex; v2 +3 stout, with pointed proximal heel, with four large setae on outer lobes as illustrated, distal process stout, short, distally blunt, with a field of microsetae ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 10–17 ). Epiproct almost semicircular, three setae medially, other setae as illustrated ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 10–17 ). Paraprocts broadly elliptic, sensory fields with 26 trichobothria on basal rosettes, setae as illustrated ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 10–17 ).
Measurements (in microns): FW: 4479, HW: 2916, F: 1353, T: 1921, t1: 808, t2: 90, t3: 160, f1: 862, f2: 678, Mx4: 323, IO: 536, D: 428, d: 266, PO: 0.62.
Variation in the fore- and hindwing veins in two male specimens. García Aldrete (2004) described the fore- and hindwing veins of the holotype of L. maracaensis as anomalous and asymmetric: right forewing with an incomplete vein arising from Cu 2 and M vein with six primary branches, with M 6 forked resulting in M 6a and M 6b; left forewing with M vein with five primary branches, with M 5 three branched and one of the veins incomplete; right hindwing M with five primary branches and left hindwing M with three primary branches, with M 1 distally branched, resulting in M 1a and M 1b.
Two male specimens collected in 2016 in the Brazilian state of Roraima show the following variations: a male (male A) with right forewing with M with six primary branches, with M 4 and M 6 forked, resulting in M 4a, M 4b, M 6a and M 6b ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 18–22 ); left forewing with the same pattern as the right forewing of the holotype, but without an incomplete vein arising from Cu 2 ( Fig.19 View FIGURES 18–22 ); in right hindwing M with four primary branches ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 18–22 ) and in left hindwing M with three primary branches and without secondary branches ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 18–22 ); another male (male B) with right forewing with the same pattern as the right forewing of the holotype, but without an incomplete vein arising from Cu 2; in left forewing M with six primary branches, with M 6 three branched, resulting in M 6a, M 6b1 and M 6b2 ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 18–22 ), right and left hindwings with the same pattern as the right hindwing of the holotype.
Material examined. (1 female, 2 males). Brazil. Roraima. Tepequém. 3°48'N 61°44'W. 15-30.iii.2016. Malaise trap. Boldrini GoogleMaps .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SubOrder |
Psocomorpha |
Family |
|
Genus |
Loneura maracaensis García Aldrete
Lima, Daniel Moura, Silva-Neto, Alberto Moreira Da, García Aldrete, Alfonso N. & Bravo, Freddy 2019 |
Loneura maracaensis García Aldrete 2004 : 306
Garcia Aldrete, A. N. & Gonzalez, O. R. 2017: 497 |
Garcia Aldrete, A. N. & Gonzalez, O. R. & Sarria Sarria, F. 2011: 61 |
Garcia Aldrete, A. N. & Mockford, E. L. 2009: 668 |
Garcia Aldrete, A. N. 2004: 306 |