Lusorex, Storch & Qiu, 2004
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.13511691 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0393E45C-FFBB-B03B-FC86-F89EB27AF9E2 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Lusorex |
status |
|
Genus Lusorex nov.
Figs. 1–6 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig .
Type species: Lusorex taishanensis sp. nov.
Etymology: After Lu, Chinese abbreviated form of Shandong Province, the provenance of the fossil, and sorex (Latin) for shrew.
Diagnosis.—First and second upper and lower molars resemble those of Wilsonosorex Martin, 1978 . Differs from Wilsonosorex by its undivided mesostyle (well−divided in Wilsonosorex ), crest−like and Y−shaped metaconule (a high pointed cusp in Wilsonosorex ), and weaker paraconule of M1–2 (strong and doubled in Wilsonosorex ); discontinuous ectocingulid below protoconid and hypoconid (below protoconid only in Wilsonosorex ), and very sharp, laterally compressed entoconid of m1–2 (less crest−like in Wilsonosorex ). Small size as in W. bateslandensis . Additional diagnostic features include rather small first upper and lower incisors. Differs from all other heterosoricine genera in having well−developed conules on upper molares and reduced ectocingulids on lowers. Postcranial skeleton essentially soricidlike. Differs from other subfamilies, as far as known, by unfused tibia and fibula.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.