Forficus Qu
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3919.2.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CCFEEA04-F04D-43B8-A627-33090014580A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6112198 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0393879D-5667-B906-FF0D-FB783063FBFD |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Forficus Qu |
status |
gen. nov. |
Forficus Qu View in CoL gen. nov.
Type species: Forficus maculatus Qu sp. nov.
Description. External morphology. Head ( Figs 1–5 View FIGURES 1 – 9 ) including eyes as wide as pronotum; vertex approximately one and a half times longer medially than next to eyes, with two transverse carinae on rim and few fine transverse striations above antennal ledge and on ocellocular region; face ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 9 ) across eyes wider than long; laterofrontal sutures ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 9 ) strongly divergent, extended to ocelli; antennae ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 9 ) located slightly above middle of eyes and 1/2 as long as body length; antennal pits encroaching onto clypeus; ocelli ( Figs 1–5 View FIGURES 1 – 9 ) situated slightly above marginal rim and visible in dorsal view, twice own diameter from eye; clypellus ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 9 ) broader apically than basally.
Forewing ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 9 ) with four apical cells, three anteapical cells, first anteapical cell open basally.
Fore femur ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1 – 9 ) with IC row arcuate; AM1 present, large; without AV row. Fore tibia ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1 – 9 ) with dorsal setal formula 1+4. Hind femur ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 1 – 9 ) with apical setal formula 2+2+1. Hind tibia ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 1 – 9 ) with 11 setae of AD row, 21 setae of PD row and numerous setae of PV and AV rows. Hind first tarsomere ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 1 – 9 a) with longitudinal row of short setae ventrally and dorsoapical pair of macrosetae at the apex and ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 1 – 9 b) distal transverse row of four platellae; second tarsomere with distal transverse row of two platellae.
Male genitalia. Pygofer lobe ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 10 – 15 ) truncate apically with margin turned inward, with several macrosetae. Segment X without processes. Valve ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 10 – 15 ) trapezoidal. Subgenital plate ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 10 – 15 ) with inner margin straight, lateral margin strongly convex basally, distal two thirds digitate, with few short fine setae near base. Style ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 10 – 15 ) with large subapical lobe; apophysis acute apically. Connective ( Figs 13, 15 View FIGURES 10 – 15 ) with stem produced posteriorly, bifurcate; connected to aedeagus with membrane. Aedeagal shaft ( Figs 13, 14 View FIGURES 10 – 15 ) tubular; slightly compressed laterally and tapered to narrowly rounded apex; with subapical processes on ventral surface; gonopore apical; basal apodeme similar in length to shaft, compressed dorsoventrally and extended laterally subapically.
Distribution. Oriental region ( China).
Diagnosis. This genus is similar to Parabolopona and Tenompoella in having the stem of the connective extended posteriorly and the aedeagus disassociated from the connective and connected by membrane ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 10 – 15 ). It is also similar to Tenompoella in having the posterior extension of the connective bifurcate but differs in lacking the bright orange coloration of this genus and in having the pygofer lobe turned inward at the apex ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 10 – 15 ), the valve trapezoid shaped ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 10 – 15 ) and the aedeagal shaft with processes ( Figs 13, 14 View FIGURES 10 – 15 ).
Etymology. This new genus name is derived from the Latin “ forficus ”, referring to the scissor-shaped connective.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |