Phronimella elongata (Claus)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.567.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:41C7D868-7BD9-46F4-94F1-EBEA427E2836 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5029992 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03931615-EC7F-FFE1-FEDF-FB16FB7FFE50 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Phronimella elongata (Claus) |
status |
|
Phronimella elongata (Claus) View in CoL
Phronima elongata Claus, 1862: 193–195 View in CoL , pl. 19, figs 2, 3 & 7.
Anchylonyx hamatus Streets, 1877: 131–132 .
Phronimella filiformis Bovallius, 1887: 26 View in CoL .
Phronimella hippocephala Giles, 1887: 217–219 View in CoL , pl. 3, fig. 3.
Type material Type material of P. elongata is considered lost (see above).
Type material of synonyms
Type material of A. hamatus could not be found at the ANSP or USNM and is considered lost.
Type material of P. filiformis could not be found at the SMNH, ZMUC or Uppsala and is considered lost .
Type material of P. hippocephala could not be found at the BMNH and is considered lost .
Remarks
Phronimella is morphologically similar to Phronima , but the body is generally more slender, and the pereopods are much more slender and elongate. In addition, uropod 2 is reduced to a small pointed process in females and juvenile males. In adult males uropod 2 is usually present in a reduced form, with a relatively welldeveloped exopod, but a small, or obsolete endopod. Occasionally adult males have uropod 2 reduced as in females.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Phronimella elongata (Claus)
Zeidler, Wolfgang 2004 |
Phronimella filiformis
Bovallius, C. 1887: 26 |
Phronimella hippocephala
Giles, G. M. 1887: 219 |
Anchylonyx hamatus
Streets, T. H. 1877: 132 |
Phronima elongata
Claus, C. 1862: 195 |