Phronima sedentaria (Forsskål)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.567.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:41C7D868-7BD9-46F4-94F1-EBEA427E2836 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5517876 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03931615-EC7A-FFFA-FEDF-FD7CFCF2FE00 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Phronima sedentaria (Forsskål) |
status |
|
Phronima sedentaria (Forsskål) View in CoL
Cancer sedentarius Forsskål, 1775: 95–96 .
Gammarus sedentarius — Schousboe, 1802: 11, figs 1–6.
Phronima sedentaria View in CoL — Latreille, 1803: 291.
Phronima custos Risso, 1816: 121 , pl. 2, fig. 3.
Phronima borneensis Bate, 1862: 318 View in CoL , pl. 51, fig. 3.
Phronima novaezealandiae Powell, 1875: 294 View in CoL , pl. 21, figs 1 & 2.
Phronima neozelanica Thomson & Chilton, 1886: 150 .
Phronima spinosa Bovallius, 1887: 25 View in CoL .
Phronima tenella Stebbing, 1888: 1354–1356 View in CoL , pl. 161A.
Phronima affinis Vosseler, 1901: 20 , pl. 1, figs 12–16.
Type material The holotype of Cancer sedentarius is in the ZMUC (Forsskål coll.): in spirit .
Type material of synonyms
Type material of P.custos seems to be lost, although the ANSP has a female specimen embedded in a dried salp ( CA 2689 ) from the GuérinMéneville collection (No. 443) which may represent type material (see Zeidler 1997) .
Type material of P. borneensis could not be found at the BMNH or MNHN and is considered lost.
Type material of P. novaezealandiae could not be found in any museum in New Zealand, or at the BMNH and is considered lost.
Type material of P. spinosa could not be found at the SMNH, ZMUC or in Uppsala and is considered lost.
The holotype of P. tenella is in the BMNH (89.5.15.205): mounted whole on a microscope slide .
The holotype of P. affinis is in the Zoological Museum , Kiel University, Germany (Cr. 0318) .
Remarks
This is the only species of Phronima in which the second antennae of the males are reduced. Females of this species can be confused with P. atlantica , especially when dealing with juveniles, but the pleonites of P. sedentaria possess a posterodistal spinose process which is absent in P. atlantica . It is also similar to P. solitaria , but males of that species have welldeveloped second antennae, and in females the carpus of pereopod 5 has a strong medial tooth adjacent to the anterior tooth.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Phronima sedentaria (Forsskål)
Zeidler, Wolfgang 2004 |
Phronima affinis
Vosseler, J. 1901: 20 |
Phronima tenella Stebbing, 1888: 1354–1356
Stebbing, T. R. R. 1888: 1356 |
Phronima spinosa
Bovallius, C. 1887: 25 |
Phronima neozelanica
Thomson, G. M. & Chilton, C. 1886: 150 |
Phronima novaezealandiae
Powell, L. 1875: 294 |
Phronima borneensis
Bate, C. S. 1862: 318 |
Phronima custos
Risso, A. 1816: 121 |
Phronima sedentaria
Latreille, P. A. 1803: 291 |
Gammarus sedentarius
Schousboe, P. K. A. 1802: 11 |
Cancer sedentarius Forsskål, 1775: 95–96
Forsskal, P. 1775: 96 |