Discodoris zibethina, (Bergh, 1878)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1046/j.1096-3642.2002.00039.x |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5106561 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03927F0E-FFF0-606B-FC0B-F93A6A77D0E5 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Discodoris zibethina |
status |
|
DISCODORIS ZIBETHINA ( BERGH 1878)
( FIGS 17 View Figure 17 , 18 View Figure 18 )
Fracassa zibethina Bergh, 1878a: 598–601 , pl. 66, figs 21–26, pl. 67, figs 1, 2.
Type material
HOLOTYPE (by monotypy): Canal at Lapinig, Philippines, March 1865, 54 mm preserved length, leg. C. Semper ( ZMUC GAS-2112 ).
Description
The colour of the living animal is unknown ( Fig. 17 View Figure 17 ). The body is very elongate and narrow, with a very reduced mantle margin, which is completely absent in some areas. The gill is situated on the posterior border of the body. The dorsum is covered with a number of small, rounded tubercles ( Fig. 18E View Figure 18 ). The rhinophoral and branchial sheaths have tubercles similar to those on the rest of the dorsum. There are six tripinnate branchial leaves. The anal papilla is situated in the centre of the branchial circle of leaves. Ventrally the anterior border of the foot is grooved and notched.
The labial cuticle is armed with a number of small, simple rodlets ( Fig. 18D View Figure 18 ). The observed radular formula is n ¥ 83.0.83. Rachidian teeth are absent. The lateral teeth are hamate and lack denticles ( Fig. 18A View Figure 18 ). The teeth from the middle portion of the half-row are larger than those closer to the medial portion of the radula ( Fig. 18B View Figure 18 ). The outermost teeth are smaller and also lack denticles ( Fig. 18C View Figure 18 ).
Remarks
The holotype of Discodoris zibethina is the only known specimen of this species. The specimen was studied and dissected by Bergh (1878a), and only the skin and some internal organs, including the radula, remain. The description of the species was based on preserved material and there is no information on the features of the living animal. With the preserved holotype it is not possible a positive identification of this species. Therefore this name is here regarded as nomen dubium.
The shape of the animal strongly resembles the remains of some species of Discodoris or Sebadoris after the autotomization of the notum ( Gohar & Soliman, 1967; Soliman, 1980; pers. obs.).
ZMUC |
Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Discodoris zibethina
Valdés, Ángel 2002 |
Fracassa zibethina
Bergh R 1878: 601 |