Tethylamna, Cappetta & Case, 2016
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/geodiversitas2021v43a5 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:697FC553-E37B-4EF9-97A4-950E4DEE246C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4606615 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03923C45-FF89-FF80-30F5-FD8AFD6A13A3 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Tethylamna |
status |
|
Tethylamna cf. twiggsensis ( Case, 1981)
EXAMINED MATERIAL. — 50 isolated teeth, figured material includes FSAC Bouj-331, 332, 333, 334, 335 and 336.
DESCRIPTION
Numerous teeth are attributed to odontaspidid Tethylamna cf. twiggsensis. This species is easily recognizable by a pair of double flat cusplets on anterior ( Fig. 3A, F View FIG ) and lateral teeth ( Fig. 3 View FIG C-E).
REMARKS
The range of this species is currently restricted to the latest Lutetian-late Priabonian and its geographic distribution extends to paleotropical seas between tropical eastern Pacific, Caribbean and oriental Neotethys ( Casier 1971; Case 1981; Case & Borodin 2000; Case & Cappetta 1990; Ward & Wiest 1990; Adnet et al. 2007; Underwood et al. 2011; Cappetta & Case 2016). Originally described from the late Eocene of Georgia, United States ( Case 1981), distinction between the middle and the late Eocene representatives are sometimes controversial. The Bartonian teeth have lateral cusplets less pronounced compared to those from Priabonian ( Underwood et al. 2011) explaining why they are often referred to confer twigssensis. These Bartonian samples could corresponds to intergradual change from the possible ancestor T. dunni of Cappetta & Case (2016) recovered from the Lutetian of Alabama, USA toward those of Priabonian, including type of species ( Case 1981).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Elasmobranchii |
Order |
|
Family |