Charisactis tetiana, Ocaña & Çinar, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2018.1526345 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:51DA9869-D786-4A8A-8C1F-62DC1BB67923 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039187AE-FFE2-0822-FE65-6C43FCF5FCFA |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Charisactis tetiana |
status |
gen. nov. et sp. nov. |
Charisactis tetiana View in CoL gen. nov. et sp. nov.
( Figures 11 View Figure 11 and 12 View Figure 12 )
Material examined
Holotype; ESFM-CNI/2013-20 , 26 June 2013, Sea of Marmara , Y49, 41°09 ʹ 26 ʺ N, 29°03 ʹ 10 ʺ E, 50 m, sandy mud with shell fragments, moderately retracted, longitudinal sectioned to GoogleMaps
study the anatomy and cnidom, 0.8 cm × 0.3 cm; Paratype, ESFM-CNI/2013-21 ; 26 June 2013, Sea of Marmara , Y49, 41°09 ʹ 26 ʺ N, 29°03 ʹ 10 ʺ E, 50 m, sandy mud with shell fragments, 1 medium size specimen strongly retracted, rest of cuticle along the column, cross sectioned to study the anatomy and cnidom, 0.2 – 1 cm × 0.2 – 0.5 cm, 5 specimens GoogleMaps .
Description
Body retracted, triangular in shape; colour pale yellowish ( Figure 11 View Figure 11 (a)). Pedal disc wide and more or less rounded ( Figure 11 View Figure 11 (a)). A deciduous cuticle covering body wall. Tentacles clearly entacmeic and some of them with strong ectodermal musculatures. No sphincter ( Figure 11 View Figure 11 (b)). Thin mesogloea with some ectodermal muscular developments. Three mesentery cycles: 6 + 6 + 12; six complete, six microcnemes with parietobasilar developments and absence of retractors; third cycle present including 12 very short microcnemes without musculatures. Pharynx folded with two large syphonoglyphs and their directives ( Figure 11 View Figure 11 (c)). First cycle mesenteries with very strong reniform restricted retractors ( Figure 11 View Figure 11 (d)).
Cnidome
A survey of the cnidom is summarized in Table 4 and Figure 12 View Figure 12 . Due to the retracted specimens and poor body condition, examination on the internal tissues was difficult. General survey of the cnidom was done, but we do not reject some slight modifications occurring specially in the filaments. Splitting penicilli B into two categories or changing the abundance of thick spirulae seems to be possible ( Figure 12 View Figure 12 ). In addition, two penicilli categories can be found in the pharynx. However, such new arrangement requires more material to be examined.
Remarks
The family Condylanthidae includes a heterogeneous group of species with different morphological characters, and with the exception of the genus Segonzactis all of them are monotypic. According to Sanamyan (2001), most genera of Condylanthidae have rarely been reported again after the original descriptions. Rieman-Zürneck (1979) emended characters to the diagnosis of Condylanthidae family and described a new genus, Segonzactis , from deep waters. This genus includes two species, Segonzactis platypus Riemann-Zürneck, 1979 and Segonzactis hartogi Vafidis and Chintiroglou 2002 (Riemann-Zürneck 1979; Vafidis & Chintiroglou 2002). The main differences between Segonzactis and Charisactis gen. nov. are that the former genus has different basilar musculature, an atypical mesenteries arrangement, single siphonoglyph and a very simple cnidom with a few capsule categories. The other genus within Condylanthidae that is morphologically similar to Charisactis gen. nov. is Charisea , as it also does not have psedudospherules, sphincter and circumscribed retractors. However, the genus Charisea has a reduced pedal disc and an elongate body wall (see Carlgren 1934; Sanamyan 2001), whereas Charisactis gen. nov. has a broad pedal disc. Cnidom is also an important character to take into account: more categories are present in the tentacles and filaments of Charisactis gen. nov. when compared to those in Charisea . Furthermore, the presence of homotrichs in the tentacles and body wall of Charisactis gen. nov. is another important difference between these two genera.
Habitat
This species was found at 50 m depth on shell fragments.
Etymology
The species name is dedicated to the ancient Tethys Sea.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |