Pararhexoacrodictys minima Cantillo & Gusmão, 2019
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.397.2.8 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039087E9-F72A-325B-FF21-FB7EA6FF0FCF |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Pararhexoacrodictys minima Cantillo & Gusmão |
status |
sp. nov. |
Pararhexoacrodictys minima Cantillo & Gusmão View in CoL sp. nov. Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2
MycoBank MB 824304
Etymology: —referring to the smaller size of conidiophores and the conidia when comparing with Pa. balansae .
Colonies effuse, brown to dark brown on natural substrate. Conidiophores macronematous, mononematous, erect, straight, arising singly or in small groups, cylindrical, smooth, light brown, darker at base, 30–55.5 × 4.5–7.5 μm. Conidiogenous cells monoblastic, integrated, terminal, cylindrical, with 1 (rarely 2) percurrent extension, pale brown, smooth. Secession rhexolytic. Conidia solitary, dry, acrogenous, holoblastic, variable in shape and cupulate, subglobose, globose or closely palmate, light brown, smooth, 30–37.5 × 21–46.5 μm. Basal cell distinctly protuberant, cuneate, truncate, 6.5–8 × 4–6.5 μm. Appendages 4–12 or more, aseptate, undulate, pale brown to subhyaline at apex, smooth, 6.5–9 × 1.5–3 μm, clustered at the apex or dispersed all over conidial body.
Material examined: — BRAZIL. Bahia: Serra da Jibóia, Santa Terezinha, from decaying bark tree, 12°46’S 39°31’W, 28 February 2006, L.F.P. Gusmão s.n (HUEFS 225278).
Notes:— When comparing this species with Pa. balansae (Y.R.Ma & X.G.Zhang) Cantillo & Gusmão comb. nov. (this article), they both have cylindrical conidiogenous cell, similar conidial shape and swollen undulate appendages. Differences are that conidiophores and conidia are larger in Pa. balansae (50–160 × 4.5–12 μm for conidiophores and 42–68 × 28–62 μm for conidia); also, appendages are frequently clustered at conidial apex and conidial shape is more variable than the described by Ma et al. (2016), having some cupulate (= turbinate) conidia with an almost palmate appearance ( Fig. 3E View FIGURE 3 ). This last feature is similar to the observed in some conidia of Pa. magnicornuata (Fiuza, Gusmão & R.F. Castañeda) Cantillo & Gusmão comb. nov. (this article) but differentiated from the latter by the smaller conidia with shorter and not circinate appendages.
Geographical distribution:— BRAZIL. Bahia: Serra da Jibóia (this paper).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.