Family
CARYBDEIDAE Gegenbaur, 1857
View in CoL
Only one genus............................... Genus
Carybdea
( Figures 2D
View Figure 2
, 3A, C
View Figure 3
)
Carybdea Péron and Lesueur, 1809
View in CoL
(refer to Mayer 1910; Gershwin and Gibbons 2010; Bentlage et al. 2010 for reviews of the genus). Type species: Medusa
marsupialis Linnaeus, 1758
View in CoL
, by subsequent designation ( Haeckel 1880). Species:
C. arborifera Maas, 1897
View in CoL
,
C. aurifera Mayer, 1900
nomen dubium,
C. branchi Gershwin, 2009
View in CoL
,
C. brevipedalia Kishinouye, 1891a
View in CoL
,
C. latigenitalia Kishinouye, 1891a
nomen dubium?=
C. brevipedalia
View in CoL
,
C. marsupialis (Linnaeus, 1758)
View in CoL
,
C. mora Kishinouye, 1910
View in CoL
=
C. brevipedalia
View in CoL
,
C. morandinii Straehler-Pohl and Jarms, 2011
[only the polyp and early stages in medusa development are known ( Straehler-Pohl and Jarms 2011) and it is possible that this species does not belong to
Carybdea
View in CoL
or is synonymous with another cubozoan],
C. murrayana Haeckel, 1880
View in CoL
,
C. prototypus ( Haeckel, 1880)
nomen dubium,
C. rastonii Haacke, 1886
View in CoL
,
C. verrucosa Hargitt, 1903
nomen dubium,
C. xaymacana Conant, 1897
View in CoL
.
Geographic distribution of the family
Global; tropical to temperate; neritic.
Remarks
Carybdea
View in CoL
represents the oldest described genus within Cubozoa
View in CoL
and many cubozoan species had been classified in this genus before the taxonomic revisions of the last decade. The family name
Carybdeidae
View in CoL
can be traced back to its establishment as Carybdeae by Lesson (1843) (cf. Calder 2009). However, Lesson (1843) established the taxon Carybdeae for a group of species that actually did not comprise any cubozoan species while Gegenbaur (1857) revised Lesson’s (1843) taxonomic framework to establish
Carybdeidae
View in CoL
more in line with how we understand the family today (cf. Haeckel 1880). For this reason, the family name
Carybdeidae
View in CoL
and order name
Carybdeida
View in CoL
are most often attributed to Gegenbaur (1857) rather than Lesson (1843).
Among the species contained in the monogeneric family
Carybdeidae
View in CoL
, most notably
Carybdea alata
was reclassified as
Alatina alata
View in CoL
( Gershwin 2005a; see above) and
Carybdea sivickisi
was reclassified in the
Tripedaliidae
View in CoL
as
Copula sivickisi
View in CoL
( Bentlage et al. 2010; see below). At present
Carybdeidae
View in CoL
represents a monogeneric family containing the sole genus
Carybdea
View in CoL
. All members of this family can readily be recognized by their heart-shaped rhopaliar niche ostia (details in Gershwin and Gibbons 2009; Collins et al. 2011). Gershwin and Gibbons (2009) present a comparative overview of the species of
Carybdea
View in CoL
and the morphological characters distinguishing these species. However, some species are missing from that study (e.g.
C. arborifera
View in CoL
).
Another species contained in Gershwin and Gibbons (2009) treatment is
C. mora
, which was recently considered to be the junior synonym of
C. brevipedalia ( Bentlage et al. 2010)
. Both species were described by Kishinouye (1891a, 1910) from Honshu, Japan.
Carybdea brevipedalia
was described from Shima ( Kishinouye 1891a) whereas
C. mora
was described from Tokyo Bay ( Kishinouye 1910) only some 200–300 km north of Shima. The descriptions of both species are lacking considerable detail and provide little to distinguish between the two species. In fact, both species seem to overlap in their morphological characteristics. In particular, the gastric phacellae consist of rows of 10–12 brush-like filaments in each corner of the stomach in
C. brevipedalia ( Kishinouye 1891a)
and 8–12 brush-like filaments in
C. mora ( Kishinouye 1910)
. We investigated several specimens of
Carybdea
collected from different locations in Japan and all possessed similar numbers of brush-like filaments in the corners of their stomachs and did not seem to differ in any other way. Pending further evidence, molecular and morphological, it seems most prudent to consider
C. mora
to be the junior synonym of
C. brevipedalia
(cf. Bentlage et al. 2010); the species is commonly known as Andon Kurage in Japan.
In summary, original descriptions as well as those provided by Mayer (1910) should be consulted in addition to Gershwin and Gibbons (2009) for identifying species of
Carybdea
. It is likely that several undescribed species of
Carybdea
exist, a view supported by molecular genetic evidence ( Bentlage et al. 2010). At the same time some species names may be synonymous with each other. As such, the family
Carybdeidae
would benefit from a comprehensive taxonomic revision combining both morphological and molecular genetic data.