Cyclemys dentata (Gray, 1831)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/megataxa.7.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3BD32BFF-0402-47FB-A9EE-FE08E260793D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6328611 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038F8788-FF80-FFE8-DAD1-F87DFA8723CF |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cyclemys dentata |
status |
|
Cyclemys dentata (Gray 1831:20, Errata)
Syntypes (at least 9): BMNH 1946.1.22.62 (formerly 1828.5.12.1) and 1946.1.22.63 (formerly 1828.5.12.2); OUM 8512-13, and 8867 (Nowak-Kemp & Fritz 2010:11); and RMNH 6062, 6063, 6067, and 40474 ( Hoogmoed et al. 2010:8). BMNH 1946.1.22.62 designated lectotype by Fritz et al. (1997:188) and sampled genetically by Stuart & Fritz (2008) and Fritz et al. (2008). Note that OUM 8512-8513 are also syntypes of Cyclemys orbiculata (Nowak-Kemp & Fritz 2010:11) , and that RMNH 6062 has been identified as C. enigmatica ( Hoogmoed et al. 2010:9) .
Cyclemys orbiculata Bell 1834:17
Syntypes (at least 5): BMNH 1946.1.22.62-63 (formerly 1828.5.12.1-2); and OUM 8512-13 (both illustrated by Bell 1836 [part 8], upper figure, Plate 3; and in Plate XXV by Sowerby & Lear 1872; both sampled genetically by Stuart & Fritz 2008), and 8867 (Nowak-Kemp & Fritz 2010:10). BMNH 1946.1.22.62 designated as neotype (and photographed) by Fritz et al. (1997:188) prior to the rediscovery of the OUM syntypes. The BMNH syntypes are also syntypes for Emys dhor Gray and OUM 8513 is a syntype of Cyclemys bellii Gray 1863 , and was sampled genetically by Stuart & Fritz (2008) and Nowak-Kemp & Fritz (2010:10).
Cistudo diardii Duméril & Bibron 1835:227
Syntypes (5): MNHN 9104-08; BMNH 1868.12 .11.164 listed as this taxon by Gray (1873:24) .
Holotype: BMNH 1863.6.21.1 (sampled genetically by Stuart & Fritz 2008 and Fritz et al. 2008).
Holotype: OUM 8513 (Nowak-Kemp & Fritz 2010:10; illustrated by Bell 1836 [part 8], upper figure, Plate 3; and by Sowerby & Lear 1872: Pl. XXV; photographed in Fritz et al. 2008:382; sampled genetically by Stuart & Fritz 2008). Note that the holotype is also a syntype of Cyclemys orbiculata Bell 1834 and Emys dhor Gray 1830 (Nowak-Kemp & Fritz 2010:10). Das (2005) erroneously listed OUM 8867 as holotype (see Stuart & Fritz 2008:134).
Cyclemys enigmatica Fritz, Guicking, Auer, Sommer, Wink, & Hundsdörfer 2008:381
Holotype: NMW 9811; paratypes (10), NHMW 1188, 29524, 29528; RMNH 3838, 6066, 6068, and 27828 ( Hoogmoed et al. 2010:5); ZMA 19029:1, 19029:2 (photographedin the originaldescription, p. 382, Fig. 12, and Fritz et al. 2008:380); and ZSM 850.1920.
Cyclemys fusca Fritz, Guicking, Auer, Sommer, Wink, & Hundsdörfer 2008:383
Holotype: MTD 42578 (photographed in the original description, p. 383, Fig. 13); paratypes (10), CAS 210070; MTD 40842-43, 41611-14, 42596, and 44176-77.
Cyclemys gemeli Fritz, Guicking,Auer, Sommer, Wink, & Hundsdörfer 2008:384
Holotype: NMW 37153 (sampled genetically in Fritz et al. 2008); no paratypes designated.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Cyclemys dentata
Iverson, John B. 2022 |
Cistudo diardii Duméril & Bibron 1835:227
Dumeril, A. M. C. & Bibron, G. 1835: 227 |
Cyclemys orbiculata
Bell, T. 1834: 17 |